Re: Let the Records Play
Posted: Sat September 21, 2013 10:17 am
It's a good song but not much more. LTRP is just embarrassing.Birds in Hell wrote:It is.Juvenal wrote:I've always thought Unemployable was a very good song.
It's a good song but not much more. LTRP is just embarrassing.Birds in Hell wrote:It is.Juvenal wrote:I've always thought Unemployable was a very good song.
I agree they didn't abandon melodies in the middle period. But they did at least put them on the backburner and it was probably a conscious decision. The melodies got more involved and the songs required a heavier investment from the listener to actually resonate. To this day, PJ fans and non-fans alike would say that Alive and Evenflow have stood the test of time. They did have susbtance to back up the melodies, that's my point. Whether someone believes these new songs do is still up for debate.digster wrote:Fair enough, I wouldn't really use uplifting or upbeat either, but fine. I was just saying I don't really think they abandoned melodies on the middle records.Release_Me wrote:Ugh. Happy was a poor choice of words and I said this earlier as well. Uplifting, upbeat or catchy would be more apt descriptions for the type of song I'm talking about. I'm saying they've (Ed's) always been great at combining that type of music and contrasting it with dark themes/lyrics and passionate delivery. That gave them the edge which the glam rock bands of the 80s lacked.digster wrote:Happy is the last word I'd use to describe a lot of PJ's early material. I think it takes a different feel in concert, just because everyone's happy to be in the room experiencing this moment, but the songs themselves feel pretty dark.
I also disagree with this whole notion that they went completely off the deep end on the middle period records. Even at their most non-commercial, they were never making Metal Machine Music. No Code, Binaural and the others may have gone into some different places but they were pretty much always rock songs with verses, choruses, bridges and melodies.
In the middle period, excepting Yield, the rock anthems ala Ten really are sparse. Very few of the rockers on Binaural, Riot Act or even No Code could be classed alongwith some of their earlier hits as far as being catchy or anthemic. Good songs, yes. But a different style. Nothing completely original, just more challenging (and to me, lesser songs).
Plus, a song being catchy for you is going to depend on how much you like the songs. Sure, there are earworms that get into your head, but they don't last. The songs that will stay catchy to people, in my opinion, are the songs that have substance to back up the melody.
The verse riff, probably. It's weird, because a lot of people have been taking the question "What the hell was that riff?" as negative, but it could easily have been positive.pappas wrote:in mikes latest interview with Triple M, when he said Stone brought in the riff for LTRP and BoB was like 'what the hell was that riff', are they talking about the crazy lead one played at the beginning of the song (and once somewhere in the middle)?
I took that as a "what is that riff? we should develop that".harmless wrote:The verse riff, probably. It's weird, because a lot of people have been taking the question "What the hell was that riff?" as negative, but it could easily have been positive.pappas wrote:in mikes latest interview with Triple M, when he said Stone brought in the riff for LTRP and BoB was like 'what the hell was that riff', are they talking about the crazy lead one played at the beginning of the song (and once somewhere in the middle)?
Yup.Mike wrote:I took that as a "what is that riff? we should develop that".harmless wrote:The verse riff, probably. It's weird, because a lot of people have been taking the question "What the hell was that riff?" as negative, but it could easily have been positive.pappas wrote:in mikes latest interview with Triple M, when he said Stone brought in the riff for LTRP and BoB was like 'what the hell was that riff', are they talking about the crazy lead one played at the beginning of the song (and once somewhere in the middle)?
its more bruce than shania twaintheplatypus wrote:Another Shania Twain compositionJuvenal wrote:I've always thought Unemployable was a very good song.
yeah that's the way i interpreted that too, as something shocking but in a good way. That's why i think it might be that intro riff rather than the verse, which didn't really stand out to me as muchMike wrote:I took that as a "what is that riff? we should develop that".harmless wrote:The verse riff, probably. It's weird, because a lot of people have been taking the question "What the hell was that riff?" as negative, but it could easily have been positive.pappas wrote:in mikes latest interview with Triple M, when he said Stone brought in the riff for LTRP and BoB was like 'what the hell was that riff', are they talking about the crazy lead one played at the beginning of the song (and once somewhere in the middle)?
Completely disagree. LTRP is such a fun song. Really catchy with some nice guitar work and a meaty bass.LetMeSleep wrote:It's a good song but not much more. LTRP is just embarrassing.Birds in Hell wrote:It is.Juvenal wrote:I've always thought Unemployable was a very good song.
"what the hell was that riff? u guys still write awesome bluesy riffs? i had no idea!"-bo'bpappas wrote:yeah that's the way i interpreted that too, as something shocking but in a good way. That's why i think it might be that intro riff rather than the verse, which didn't really stand out to me as muchMike wrote:I took that as a "what is that riff? we should develop that".harmless wrote:The verse riff, probably. It's weird, because a lot of people have been taking the question "What the hell was that riff?" as negative, but it could easily have been positive.pappas wrote:in mikes latest interview with Triple M, when he said Stone brought in the riff for LTRP and BoB was like 'what the hell was that riff', are they talking about the crazy lead one played at the beginning of the song (and once somewhere in the middle)?
yeah I'm not sure why LTRP is embarrassing?SJM wrote:Completely disagree. LTRP is such a fun song. Really catchy with some nice guitar work and a meaty bass.LetMeSleep wrote:It's a good song but not much more. LTRP is just embarrassing.Birds in Hell wrote:It is.Juvenal wrote:I've always thought Unemployable was a very good song.
I don't find much about PJ embarrassing (well, maybe if they break out Leash again)
LetMeSleep should be embarrassed he posted thatstip wrote:yeah I'm not sure why LTRP is embarrassing?SJM wrote:Completely disagree. LTRP is such a fun song. Really catchy with some nice guitar work and a meaty bass.LetMeSleep wrote:It's a good song but not much more. LTRP is just embarrassing.Birds in Hell wrote:It is.Juvenal wrote:I've always thought Unemployable was a very good song.
I don't find much about PJ embarrassing (well, maybe if they break out Leash again)