Page 15 of 16

Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

Posted: Mon January 22, 2018 3:24 pm
by Orpheus
I like when people talk shit about a movie they clearly didn't really understand.

Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

Posted: Mon January 22, 2018 3:46 pm
by VinylGuy
dimejinky99 wrote:Not at all. Verm and I are solidly on the same page about this here film.
yeah, but you were already starting a SW discussion. I cant let that happen in this thread. This thread is about excellence. Its about art.

Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

Posted: Mon January 22, 2018 3:47 pm
by dimejinky99
VinylGuy wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:Not at all. Verm and I are solidly on the same page about this here film.
yeah, but you were already starting a SW discussion. I cant let that happen in this thread. This thread is about excellence. Its about art.

It’s a film with the phrase ‘member berries’ in it.
Hardly high art :lol:

Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

Posted: Mon January 22, 2018 3:53 pm
by VinylGuy
You still cant see it dontcha? Its ok. Its fine.

Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

Posted: Mon January 22, 2018 4:21 pm
by LoathedVermin72
Orpheus wrote:I like when people talk shit about a movie they clearly didn't really understand.
Ugh. This is such a dumb/tired argument.

Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

Posted: Mon January 22, 2018 4:22 pm
by VinylGuy
Not always, but i agree.

And its ok not to like a movie by the way.

Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

Posted: Mon January 22, 2018 5:03 pm
by Orpheus
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
Orpheus wrote:I like when people talk shit about a movie they clearly didn't really understand.
Ugh. This is such a dumb/tired argument.
I don't mean in the pretentious sense, I mean basic plot mechanics. Dime didn't seem to understand K was a replica from the beginning, which is basic for understanding the movie. That's all I was saying.

Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

Posted: Mon January 22, 2018 6:06 pm
by LoathedVermin72
I don’t really blame dime for being disinterested to the point of not paying attention, TBH

Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

Posted: Mon January 22, 2018 6:20 pm
by Mecca
I’m banning all of you

Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

Posted: Mon January 22, 2018 7:05 pm
by dimejinky99
Orpheus wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
Orpheus wrote:I like when people talk shit about a movie they clearly didn't really understand.
Ugh. This is such a dumb/tired argument.
I don't mean in the pretentious sense, I mean basic plot mechanics. Dime didn't seem to understand K was a replica from the beginning, which is basic for understanding the movie. That's all I was saying.

I did know it just didn’t really interest me. What, a human rights movement for replicants. Woop de doo. Just felt this was one thing among many scattered things it was trying to do. Too scattered.

Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

Posted: Mon January 22, 2018 7:48 pm
by LoathedVermin72
It’s like everything I don’t like about contemporary movies thrown into a blender

Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

Posted: Mon January 22, 2018 10:48 pm
by epilogue
I get that.

Subtle characters. Competent direction. Solid script. Excellent cinematography. Slow pace. Gorgeous imagery. Wonderful performances. Exploration on genre. Humanity in unexpected places. Good dialogue. Imagination.

This movie is the worst.

Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

Posted: Mon January 22, 2018 10:53 pm
by Sgt. Crackpot
I haven't seen this yet. I loved the original, and meant to see this at the cinemas but for various reasons missed it.

Should I bother? Is it worth hiring via Google Play for $6? Is there a dialogue that gets removed in the Director's Cut? Do we get to see more replicant boobs?

Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

Posted: Mon January 22, 2018 10:57 pm
by dimejinky99
It’s robotic. And cold. And heartless.

Maybe that’s the point. But I need a relatable likeable or detestable main character at the very least to take you in and along. If K is meant to be that, he isn’t. Even his journey isn’t really mapped out. You don’t care enough about him even if you’re sure what he’s trying to do. Which I wasn’t.

Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

Posted: Mon January 22, 2018 11:10 pm
by epilogue
It's not any of those things.

Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

Posted: Mon January 22, 2018 11:18 pm
by Sgt. Crackpot
What about my most important questions? Is it worth $6, and replicant boobs?

Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

Posted: Mon January 22, 2018 11:23 pm
by dimejinky99
durdencommatyler wrote:It's not any of those things.

That was my point though. It’s very much a on inverse of what I want and expect from a film which is usually to take you along with it. This film is the opposite of that. You’re watching events unfold from a cold remove with nobody as your avatar or point of focus.
I’m sure that’s part of its *beauty and it is beautiful. It just had no heart for me because of it

Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

Posted: Mon January 22, 2018 11:38 pm
by LoathedVermin72
durdencommatyler wrote:I get that.

Subtle characters. Competent direction. Solid script. Excellent cinematography. Slow pace. Gorgeous imagery. Wonderful performances. Exploration on genre. Humanity in unexpected places. Good dialogue. Imagination.

This movie is the worst.
You’re the worst.

Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

Posted: Tue January 23, 2018 12:19 am
by Orpheus
Sgt. Crackpot wrote:What about my most important questions? Is it worth $6, and replicant boobs?
There is nudity but it's not really sexy nudity for the most part. It's definitely worth seeing.

Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)

Posted: Tue January 23, 2018 12:33 am
by Sgt. Crackpot
Orpheus wrote:
Sgt. Crackpot wrote:What about my most important questions? Is it worth $6, and replicant boobs?
There is nudity but it's not really sexy nudity for the most part. It's definitely worth seeing.
Intriguing. OK, I'll give it a go.