Page 15 of 43
Re: TV: Stranger Things
Posted: Tue September 13, 2016 5:46 pm
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Re: TV: Stranger Things
Posted: Tue September 13, 2016 6:43 pm
by Kaius
Team BadaBart here. Idk wtf the rest of you jabronies are watching.
Re: TV: Stranger Things
Posted: Tue September 13, 2016 6:45 pm
by BurtReynolds
Kaius wrote:Team BadaBart here. Idk wtf the rest of you jabronies are watching.
she's fine.
Re: TV: Stranger Things
Posted: Tue September 13, 2016 6:47 pm
by Kaius
Team BadaBartBurt.
Re: TV: Stranger Things
Posted: Tue September 13, 2016 6:48 pm
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Re: TV: Stranger Things
Posted: Tue September 13, 2016 6:48 pm
by BurtReynolds
Alliances are forming.
Re: TV: Stranger Things
Posted: Tue September 13, 2016 8:42 pm
by epilogue
bart wrote:She starts at a frazzled 6, and then quickly progresses to 10 once it becomes clear that her kid is nowhere to be found. As one would expect.
She starts at a frazzled 37 and instantly goes to a .... ah, nevermind. She's terrible in this.
Re: TV: Stranger Things
Posted: Wed September 14, 2016 1:18 am
by bada
Friends don't lie Joey.
Re: TV: Stranger Things
Posted: Wed September 14, 2016 10:59 am
by Bi_3
I stand by 8.5/10. There was so much to enjoy here it was pretty easy to overlook Ryder's 'performance'. But trying to recapture it in season 2 is a mistake IMO.
Re: TV: Stranger Things
Posted: Wed September 14, 2016 2:35 pm
by Rob
This is basically the same Winona Ryder we've seen for 30 years. Some roles may suit her better, but she's never been the type of actress (to me) that ever lets you forget it's her. I'm not sure what people expect. You either like her or you don't (I do).
I thought this show was excellent - a good, fun series to watch in between the serious dramas on HBO, Netflix, etc...
Re: TV: Stranger Things
Posted: Wed September 14, 2016 2:37 pm
by epilogue
Rob wrote:This is basically the same Winona Ryder we've seen for 30 years. Some roles may suit her better, but she's never been the type of actress (to me) that ever lets you forget it's her. I'm not sure what people expect. You either like her or you don't (I do).
I thought this show was excellent - a good, fun series to watch in between the serious dramas on HBO, Netflix, etc...
I like Winona Ryder a lot. Usually. She just sucks in this. Until the end.
Re: TV: Stranger Things
Posted: Wed September 14, 2016 2:49 pm
by epilogue
The overall show is good with flashes of great. I'd give it a 7/10.
Re: TV: Stranger Things
Posted: Fri September 16, 2016 3:50 pm
by Brett
I thought it was pretty solid, albeit flawed. It's very plot-focused, which is fine, but it sacrifices character depth for it, which isn't so fine. Most of the characters are flat, though I did quite like Chief Hopper, Eleven, and the science teacher. It also feels like a pastiche, with most of its trope invocations, references and homages being a little too on the nose. By the end, however, it did do a nice job of subverting a few of my expectations insofar as that.
Re: TV: Stranger Things
Posted: Fri September 16, 2016 4:02 pm
by bart
Brett wrote:I thought it was pretty solid, albeit flawed. It's very plot-focused, which is fine, but it sacrifices character depth for it, which isn't so fine. Most of the characters are flat, though I did quite like Chief Hopper, Eleven, and the science teacher. It also feels like a pastiche, with most of its trope invocations, references and homages being a little too on the nose. By the end, however, it did do a nice job of subverting a few of my expectations insofar as that.
What did you think about the mise-en-scene? How about the decoupage during the denouement?
Re: TV: Stranger Things
Posted: Fri September 16, 2016 4:09 pm
by Brett
C for effort. You could certainly try harder.
Re: TV: Stranger Things
Posted: Fri September 16, 2016 4:11 pm
by bart
Brett wrote:C for effort. You could certainly try harder.
You sure couldn't!
Re: TV: Stranger Things
Posted: Fri September 16, 2016 4:54 pm
by epilogue
bart wrote:Brett wrote:C for effort. You could certainly try harder.
You sure couldn't!

Re: TV: Stranger Things
Posted: Fri September 16, 2016 7:26 pm
by VinylGuy
Winona was good here guys.
Re: TV: Stranger Things
Posted: Fri September 16, 2016 7:27 pm
by epilogue
We're over that now, TVG.
Re: TV: Stranger Things
Posted: Fri September 16, 2016 8:26 pm
by BurtReynolds
bart wrote:Brett wrote:I thought it was pretty solid, albeit flawed. It's very plot-focused, which is fine, but it sacrifices character depth for it, which isn't so fine. Most of the characters are flat, though I did quite like Chief Hopper, Eleven, and the science teacher. It also feels like a pastiche, with most of its trope invocations, references and homages being a little too on the nose. By the end, however, it did do a nice job of subverting a few of my expectations insofar as that.
What did you think about the mise-en-scene? How about the decoupage during the denouement?
Loved all those things. The denouement is my favorite Dungeons and Dragons monster.