darthvedder81 wrote:harmless wrote:I'm sorry, but when have Ed's lyrics ever been direct and free of a thousand interpretations? He couldn't be more direct than this. Sure he was occasionally more direct on S/T but those songs sounded like a journal entry. He was decidedly *less* direct, to a vague extent, on Comatose. I mean I just don't get what people are wanting. I think it's 100% obvious what these lyrics are about and who Ed is attacking. Just my opinion, but what do people want? Was there a golden era of directness that people want Ed to return to? "Role, role model, roll models in blood..."? That's not direct either. That's metaphor, and the target of the venom could be anyone. That's part of the deciphering. I just think some people here are making up reasons to be unhappy with this.
Satan's Bed wasn't direct? Uh yeah it was. It was a stinging indictment of vanity and the self-exploitative nature of celebrity. I know this because I read the lyrics in the liner notes and also because you can actually hear what Ed is singing most of the time.
Look obviously there are a ton of PJ songs open to interpretation. I would argue, however, that the angrier ones tend to be pretty damn direct. Which again is what I don't understand about this song. Is this serious angry "Leash" Ed or sarcastic angry "Do the Evolution" Ed? Right now everyone is seemingly pissed off at religion so they are going with "angry Ed" but I'm not convinced. Slamming religion that broadly would be a pretty big step for the band to take. Even in some of Ed's most politically or socially pointed songs there's traditionally been a through line of self-doubt.
Ed is not 'slamming religion'. I'm not going to write again in detail about what I think he's doing, but there's loads of stuff I've written on it if you care to look. In short, white middle America peddling fundamentalist conservative views and policies under the guise of religion, whilst telling us to mind our manners: anti-choice, anti-gay, anti-women etc. The chorus is more hopeful and suggests another way. He's not slamming faith, or people with faith, at all. He's slamming a particular large contingent. Yes, I'm doing some interpretation work, but it doesn't take me long to get some answers.
It seems to me that you're confusing 'direct' with 'angry and full of cuss words'. This song doesn't contain 'Satan's Bed', and it doesn't contain the line 'I never sucked Satan's dick', but it's still perfectly obvious to me what it's about, and the songs you mention are *not* more obvious and they are *not* more objective (which is what I think you mean by 'direct'). Ed is not swearing his mouth off in this song, making dick jokes or calling anyone Satan or rolling them in blood... but is all that needed for directness? Ed's surely just calling for his interpreters to try a little harder here. But I do mean 'a little', because I'm still dumbfounded that people don't understand what this song is about. It's snarky and sarcastic, not raging. The mood, the intent, the target and the method are not the same as the songs you mention above. So I'm guessing this is going to be another song (like Amongst The Waves) which had an intention (to be like X or Y other song in their catalogue?) but just didn't reach it? Not imo. I don't really know what to say about the self-doubt thing, I thought you wanted directness? I don't think Ed is in any doubt of the things he's singing here, and why should he be? Should he be pulling any punches against fundamentalist religion? I'm glad he isn't.