Red Mosquito

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

philpritchard wrote:This Patrick Kane case is getting pretty crazy.

Seriously, how does that happen? Did someone take it from the station and put it there as a message?!

It seems awfully suspicious that the results of the test leaked to the media and then a few days later all of the evidence went missing.

philpritchard wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

philpritchard wrote:This Patrick Kane case is getting pretty crazy.

Seriously, how does that happen? Did someone take it from the station and put it there as a message?!

It seems awfully suspicious that the results of the test leaked to the media and then a few days later all of the evidence went missing.

So what is the working theory? That a Chicago PD officer that is a huge Hawks fan is messing with evidence?

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

philpritchard wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

philpritchard wrote:This Patrick Kane case is getting pretty crazy.

Seriously, how does that happen? Did someone take it from the station and put it there as a message?!

It seems awfully suspicious that the results of the test leaked to the media and then a few days later all of the evidence went missing.

So what is the working theory? That a Chicago PD officer that is a huge Hawks fan is messing with evidence?

No idea. Something like that honestly wouldn't surprise me because of the (often disgusting) nature of sports fandom, but I would never just assume that to be the case. It certainly seems like, whatever the motive, it was clearly intentional.

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

philpritchard wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

philpritchard wrote:This Patrick Kane case is getting pretty crazy.

Seriously, how does that happen? Did someone take it from the station and put it there as a message?!

It seems awfully suspicious that the results of the test leaked to the media and then a few days later all of the evidence went missing.

So what is the working theory? That a Chicago PD officer that is a huge Hawks fan is messing with evidence?

*Hamburg PD

This Kane thing is like a Law and Order SVU episode.

Mecca wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

philpritchard wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

philpritchard wrote:This Patrick Kane case is getting pretty crazy.

Seriously, how does that happen? Did someone take it from the station and put it there as a message?!

It seems awfully suspicious that the results of the test leaked to the media and then a few days later all of the evidence went missing.

So what is the working theory? That a Chicago PD officer that is a huge Hawks fan is messing with evidence?

*Hamburg PD

I don't think you understand how Chicago politics and police work....

Fuck You Jobu wrote:

Mecca wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

philpritchard wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

philpritchard wrote:This Patrick Kane case is getting pretty crazy.

Seriously, how does that happen? Did someone take it from the station and put it there as a message?!

It seems awfully suspicious that the results of the test leaked to the media and then a few days later all of the evidence went missing.

So what is the working theory? That a Chicago PD officer that is a huge Hawks fan is messing with evidence?

*Hamburg PD

I don't think you understand how Chicago politics and police work....

You guys know that Kane lives in upstate NY and this alleged crime took place there, right?

shinkdew wrote:

Fuck You Jobu wrote:

Mecca wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

philpritchard wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

philpritchard wrote:This Patrick Kane case is getting pretty crazy.

Seriously, how does that happen? Did someone take it from the station and put it there as a message?!

It seems awfully suspicious that the results of the test leaked to the media and then a few days later all of the evidence went missing.

So what is the working theory? That a Chicago PD officer that is a huge Hawks fan is messing with evidence?

*Hamburg PD

I don't think you understand how Chicago politics and police work....

You guys know that Kane lives in upstate NY and this alleged crime took place there, right?

he doesn't live in upstate new york

welp. Now the lawyer for the accuser is stepping down because he apparently doesn't believe the mother's story of how she found the evidence bag.

E.H. Ruddock wrote:welp. Now the lawyer for the accuser is stepping down because he apparently doesn't believe the mother's story of how she found the evidence bag.

Well, the mother's story does sound absurd. Like that would be hard to pull off in a movie and make it seem believable. It was a good, professional move by the lawyer to step down.

shinkdew wrote:

Fuck You Jobu wrote:

Mecca wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

philpritchard wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

philpritchard wrote:This Patrick Kane case is getting pretty crazy.

Seriously, how does that happen? Did someone take it from the station and put it there as a message?!

It seems awfully suspicious that the results of the test leaked to the media and then a few days later all of the evidence went missing.

So what is the working theory? That a Chicago PD officer that is a huge Hawks fan is messing with evidence?

*Hamburg PD

I don't think you understand how Chicago politics and police work....

You guys know that Kane lives in upstate NY and this alleged crime took place there, right?

You do know he plays in Chicago and is loved there, esp by the mayor, right?

Anyways, my comment was more tongue in cheek.

E.H. Ruddock wrote:welp. Now the lawyer for the accuser is stepping down because he apparently doesn't believe the mother's story of how she found the evidence bag.

Also sounds like the accuser's friend isn't going to testify because she's not sure she believes the story any more.

Non-Kaner question, but Bruins related so don't read any further if you'd prefer to talk about the first topic or not talk about the second.



Could the Bs LTIR both Chara and Seidenberg and then take on more money against the cap? Seems like a good idea at this point and a way to circumvent the shitty situation.

elliseamos wrote:Non-Kaner question, but Bruins related so don't read any further if you'd prefer to talk about the first topic or not talk about the second.



Could the Bs LTIR both Chara and Seidenberg and then take on more money against the cap? Seems like a good idea at this point and a way to circumvent the shitty situation.

Yes, but the problem becomes when 1 or both of those guys come back you're pretty much fucked

MattA75 wrote:

elliseamos wrote:Non-Kaner question, but Bruins related so don't read any further if you'd prefer to talk about the first topic or not talk about the second.



Could the Bs LTIR both Chara and Seidenberg and then take on more money against the cap? Seems like a good idea at this point and a way to circumvent the shitty situation.

Yes, but the problem becomes when 1 or both of those guys come back you're pretty much fucked

didn'tthe hawks do this last year with vermette?

elliseamos wrote:

MattA75 wrote:

elliseamos wrote:Non-Kaner question, but Bruins related so don't read any further if you'd prefer to talk about the first topic or not talk about the second.



Could the Bs LTIR both Chara and Seidenberg and then take on more money against the cap? Seems like a good idea at this point and a way to circumvent the shitty situation.

Yes, but the problem becomes when 1 or both of those guys come back you're pretty much fucked

didn'tthe hawks do this last year with vermette?

I actually googled around some things out of curiosity from your post, and this whole article pretty much came true, though Kane did get back in time for the first series of the playoffs I believe
http://alongtheboards.com/2015/02/salar ... lackhawks/

The idea that the salary cap doesn't count in the playoffs is just BEGGING to be abused...I'm kind of shocked in took this long for a team to take advantage of that

Also, the Bruins situation is quite different, as there's no way they could possibly claim Seidenberg is going to be out until at least the playoffs when the season hasn't even started yet

MattA75 wrote:

elliseamos wrote:

MattA75 wrote:

elliseamos wrote:Non-Kaner question, but Bruins related so don't read any further if you'd prefer to talk about the first topic or not talk about the second.



Could the Bs LTIR both Chara and Seidenberg and then take on more money against the cap? Seems like a good idea at this point and a way to circumvent the shitty situation.

Yes, but the problem becomes when 1 or both of those guys come back you're pretty much fucked

didn'tthe hawks do this last year with vermette?

I actually googled around some things out of curiosity from your post, and this whole article pretty much came true, though Kane did get back in time for the first series of the playoffs I believe
http://alongtheboards.com/2015/02/salar ... lackhawks/

The idea that the salary cap doesn't count in the playoffs is just BEGGING to be abused...I'm kind of shocked in took this long for a team to take advantage of that

Also, the Bruins situation is quite different, as there's no way they could possibly claim Seidenberg is going to be out until at least the playoffs when the season hasn't even started yet

That's what pissed me off the most about the way the Bruin's season ended. They could have landed vermette and been over the cap, but Neely vetoed it.

elliseamos wrote:

MattA75 wrote:

elliseamos wrote:

MattA75 wrote:

elliseamos wrote:Non-Kaner question, but Bruins related so don't read any further if you'd prefer to talk about the first topic or not talk about the second.



Could the Bs LTIR both Chara and Seidenberg and then take on more money against the cap? Seems like a good idea at this point and a way to circumvent the shitty situation.

Yes, but the problem becomes when 1 or both of those guys come back you're pretty much fucked

didn'tthe hawks do this last year with vermette?

I actually googled around some things out of curiosity from your post, and this whole article pretty much came true, though Kane did get back in time for the first series of the playoffs I believe
http://alongtheboards.com/2015/02/salar ... lackhawks/

The idea that the salary cap doesn't count in the playoffs is just BEGGING to be abused...I'm kind of shocked in took this long for a team to take advantage of that

Also, the Bruins situation is quite different, as there's no way they could possibly claim Seidenberg is going to be out until at least the playoffs when the season hasn't even started yet

That's what pissed me off the most about the way the Bruin's season ended. They could have landed vermette and been over the cap, but Neely vetoed it.

You really wanted them to give up a first round pick for a rental? That team wasn't going anywhere

MattA75 wrote:

elliseamos wrote:

MattA75 wrote:

elliseamos wrote:

MattA75 wrote:

elliseamos wrote:Non-Kaner question, but Bruins related so don't read any further if you'd prefer to talk about the first topic or not talk about the second.



Could the Bs LTIR both Chara and Seidenberg and then take on more money against the cap? Seems like a good idea at this point and a way to circumvent the shitty situation.

Yes, but the problem becomes when 1 or both of those guys come back you're pretty much fucked

didn'tthe hawks do this last year with vermette?

I actually googled around some things out of curiosity from your post, and this whole article pretty much came true, though Kane did get back in time for the first series of the playoffs I believe
http://alongtheboards.com/2015/02/salar ... lackhawks/

The idea that the salary cap doesn't count in the playoffs is just BEGGING to be abused...I'm kind of shocked in took this long for a team to take advantage of that

Also, the Bruins situation is quite different, as there's no way they could possibly claim Seidenberg is going to be out until at least the playoffs when the season hasn't even started yet

That's what pissed me off the most about the way the Bruin's season ended. They could have landed vermette and been over the cap, but Neely vetoed it.

You really wanted them to give up a first round pick for a rental? That team wasn't going anywhere

Vermette was pretty good for Chicago and the Bruins could have been a contender!