Re: What movies are you watching?
Posted: Fri January 28, 2022 10:28 pm
That's not how I remember it
ive seen all of his movies. i think Limits of Control the best. maybe Paterson. love pretty much everything but Only Lovers and The Dead.Mickey wrote:It's a puzzling little film, in some ways it felt underwhelming and in others it was perfect--I found myself really charmed by the slow, almost wistful boredom that stalks many of the scenes. I'll have to sit on it to see how it ranks for me.washing machine wrote:Stranger than Paradise might make my list.
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Give Only Lovers another chance, I think it's one of the best movies of the 2000s. The Dead Don't Die is lighter fare to a certain extent but it is also in a way Jarmusch saying "fuck you!" to anyone attempting to use genre tropes to understand climate change (as he sort of did in Only Lovers!). So I think those two movies together are really interesting. I'm in the minority of people who didn't love Paterson.Malloy wrote:ive seen all of his movies. i think Limits of Control the best. maybe Paterson. love pretty much everything but Only Lovers and The Dead.Mickey wrote:It's a puzzling little film, in some ways it felt underwhelming and in others it was perfect--I found myself really charmed by the slow, almost wistful boredom that stalks many of the scenes. I'll have to sit on it to see how it ranks for me.washing machine wrote:Stranger than Paradise might make my list.
trag — Limits of Control is an excellent and logical companion to The Five Obstructions
Seems like that would work in your favor.Mickey wrote:Probably because I fucking hate poets and poetry.
I really liked the scene about "Bob Frost" in Down By Law.epilogue wrote:Seems like that would work in your favor.Mickey wrote:Probably because I fucking hate poets and poetry.
man, the premise of your reading of DEAD is in the dead-center of my aesthetic bailiwickMickey wrote:Give Only Lovers another chance, I think it's one of the best movies of the 2000s. The Dead Don't Die is lighter fare to a certain extent but it is also in a way Jarmusch saying "fuck you!" to anyone attempting to use genre tropes to understand climate change (as he sort of did in Only Lovers!). So I think those two movies together are really interesting. I'm in the minority of people who didn't love Paterson.Malloy wrote:ive seen all of his movies. i think Limits of Control the best. maybe Paterson. love pretty much everything but Only Lovers and The Dead.Mickey wrote:It's a puzzling little film, in some ways it felt underwhelming and in others it was perfect--I found myself really charmed by the slow, almost wistful boredom that stalks many of the scenes. I'll have to sit on it to see how it ranks for me.washing machine wrote:Stranger than Paradise might make my list.
trag — Limits of Control is an excellent and logical companion to The Five Obstructions
how fucking relieved are you that the terminus of your training wasn’t poetry mfa? theory/criticism saves lives (our, at a minimum prevents one from becoming yet another bloodless, bourgeois writer)Mickey wrote:Probably because I fucking hate poets and poetry.
i’m a partisan of the michaels/brown/nonsite argument about the limits of political “art” because of its subsumption by the market, in which political entertainments are reduced to part of an array of commodities that satisfy a boundless & interminable process of market segmentationMickey wrote:Go on...
which part?The Argonaut wrote:And, yet, it still doesn't make a lick of sense to me!
the part with the wordsMalloy wrote:which part?The Argonaut wrote:And, yet, it still doesn't make a lick of sense to me!
The Argonaut wrote:the part with the wordsMalloy wrote:which part?The Argonaut wrote:And, yet, it still doesn't make a lick of sense to me!
I'm sure you're right about whatever you're saying, I just don't have the will to read it slowly three times and figure out if that's the case