Re: NHL Thread
Posted: Wed February 03, 2016 3:11 pm
So they just released the logo right? Is there going to be a new jersey release as well?
There will be, but I don't think anything is officially scheduled yet.chuck taylor wrote:So they just released the logo right? Is there going to be a new jersey release as well?
It's too bad he missed so much time in the prime of his career. From 2010-11 to 2012-13, he had 159 points in 99 games. That's nuts.chuck taylor wrote:So Crosby is 2 points away from 900. He'll end up getting there in well under 700 games, that's really impressive.
Veiny and with a butt crackphilpritchard wrote:This looks awesome.
it was the stick handling that really made it stand out. I'm not sure how he found room to get between them.philpritchard wrote:Yeah, that was beautiful.chuck taylor wrote:And that McDavid goal was awesome. Reminded me of when Crosby came back after his absence in '11 and scored right away against the Islanders.
getting between them was just bad defense. the incredible part of the goal was the coordination and hand eye skill to find the puck again, stop and deke out the goalieDev wrote:it was the stick handling that really made it stand out. I'm not sure how he found room to get between them.philpritchard wrote:Yeah, that was beautiful.chuck taylor wrote:And that McDavid goal was awesome. Reminded me of when Crosby came back after his absence in '11 and scored right away against the Islanders.
I don't share this sentiment at all.Dev wrote:pretty annoyed watching the Sens down by 2 after 5 minutes
thanks for letting me know, philphilpritchard wrote:I don't share this sentiment at all.Dev wrote:pretty annoyed watching the Sens down by 2 after 5 minutes
Any time.Dev wrote:thanks for letting me know, philphilpritchard wrote:I don't share this sentiment at all.Dev wrote:pretty annoyed watching the Sens down by 2 after 5 minutes

that feed to Stone was probably the best play of the game.chuck taylor wrote:Karlsson with 4 assists tonight, wow.
Well played... part of me wants to reiterate that I'm perfectly happy with losses at this point, but a bigger part of me is never happy with a loss to the Sens, especially like that one.Dev wrote:SENS ARE LOOKING PRETTY GOOD TONIGHT, PHIL.
So, Dev... um... shit just got weird.Dev wrote:SENS ARE LOOKING PRETTY GOOD TONIGHT, PHIL.
I just signed on to come tell you. You cant feel good about this? I'm pretty psyched. Michalek is the only real loss.philpritchard wrote:So, Dev... um... shit just got weird.Dev wrote:SENS ARE LOOKING PRETTY GOOD TONIGHT, PHIL.
Well this year and the next couple are essentially a write-off anyway, so, while I'll miss watching Phaneuf and think he was wildly under-appreciated during his time in Toronto, it was the right move, and it makes sense. By the time the Leafs are ready to really compete (which, even if things go perfectly, isn't likely to happen for at least three years or so) Phaneuf contract will be a hindrance. They got rid of him without having to retain anything, so that's nice.Dev wrote:I just signed on to come tell you. You cant feel good about this? I'm pretty psyched. Michalek is the only real loss.philpritchard wrote:So, Dev... um... shit just got weird.Dev wrote:SENS ARE LOOKING PRETTY GOOD TONIGHT, PHIL.