Page 149 of 508

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 2:52 am
by Simple Torture
Changing the subject: does anyone actually believe that the Iron Throne and whose butt sits on it will matter much to the endgame of the series at all? The more and more I think about it (and this idea isn't totally original to me, it's more like an amalgamation of many threads picked up from many theories), the more I'm convinced that Westeros and the Seven Kingdoms will be unrecognizable when the dust clears, and that all the ink that's been spilled over who has the right to the throne, who has the best claim to the throne, etc. will have been wasted, since there won't be a throne to sit on or a kingdom to rule in the end. Thoughts?

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 2:55 am
by Norah
Simple Torture wrote:Changing the subject: does anyone actually believe that the Iron Throne and whose butt sits on it will matter much to the endgame of the series at all? The more and more I think about it (and this idea isn't totally original to me, it's more like an amalgamation of many threads picked up from many theories), the more I'm convinced that Westeros and the Seven Kingdoms will be unrecognizable when the dust clears, and that all the ink that's been spilled over who has the right to the throne, who has the best claim to the throne, etc. will have been wasted, since there won't be a throne to sit on or a kingdom to rule in the end. Thoughts?
I wouldn't be surprised if the seven kingdoms became seven true kingdoms again.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 3:01 am
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 3:03 am
by Norah
tragabigzanda wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:Changing the subject: does anyone actually believe that the Iron Throne and whose butt sits on it will matter much to the endgame of the series at all? The more and more I think about it (and this idea isn't totally original to me, it's more like an amalgamation of many threads picked up from many theories), the more I'm convinced that Westeros and the Seven Kingdoms will be unrecognizable when the dust clears, and that all the ink that's been spilled over who has the right to the throne, who has the best claim to the throne, etc. will have been wasted, since there won't be a throne to sit on or a kingdom to rule in the end. Thoughts?
Not sure. It is centrally located between the Riverlands, the Vale, and the North, so it could come to play in some sort of future major battle.

Can someone refresh me on what's gone on recently on the nearby mainland? I know Littlefinger just went back to The Vale, and I know what's going on at King's Landing, but how about in the countryside in between? War? Happy people?
There's a siege going on at Riverrun.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 3:08 am
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 3:08 am
by Mecca
chud is just using book information instead of show information

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 3:09 am
by Norah
my bad

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 3:10 am
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 3:13 am
by Mecca
tragabigzanda wrote:Ah. Would still be interested to know, considering the show might try to streamline it.
Spoiler: show
The Freys are trying to flush out the Blackfish because he and Tully supporters are occupying it in protest of the Freys killing their way to becoming Lords of the Riverlands

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 3:13 am
by Norah
You should read books 4 and 5. Go with the combined version. http://boiledleather.com/post/259025541 ... rder-for-a

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 3:28 am
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 3:29 am
by Norah
tragabigzanda wrote:
Mecca wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:Ah. Would still be interested to know, considering the show might try to streamline it.
Spoiler: show
The Freys are trying to flush out the Blackfish because he and Tully supporters are occupying it in protest of the Freys killing their way to becoming Lords of the Riverlands
Spoiler: show
Well if the Blackfish wins, then he holds a large swath of land and would likely support any Jon/Sansa-lead battle in his neighborhood. I'm less clear on what the Freys would do with any power they might yield. Probably just sell it to the highest bidder.
After the Red Wedding I'm pretty sure
Spoiler: show
the Freys are with the Lannisters/Boltons
.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 3:34 am
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 3:37 am
by Mecca
Coach wrote:
Mecca wrote:
MitchCumstein wrote:Yeah, but in a show with a ton of source material to work with, they just show this kid a bit too much for my liking.
Ollie becomes king on the iron throne in the books
Yeah, use the spoiler tag. Don't know if it's true or not, but there's a thread for spoilers from the book.
guys, i love this post from a year ago

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 3:40 am
by Mecca
tragabigzanda wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
Mecca wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:Ah. Would still be interested to know, considering the show might try to streamline it.
Spoiler: show
The Freys are trying to flush out the Blackfish because he and Tully supporters are occupying it in protest of the Freys killing their way to becoming Lords of the Riverlands
Spoiler: show
Well if the Blackfish wins, then he holds a large swath of land and would likely support any Jon/Sansa-lead battle in his neighborhood. I'm less clear on what the Freys would do with any power they might yield. Probably just sell it to the highest bidder.
After the Red Wedding I'm pretty sure
Spoiler: show
the Freys are with the Lannisters/Boltons
.
Spoiler: show
Narratively-speaking, yes, that's what they have stated. But I'm not sure I trust their fealty to anyone other than themselves, and neither the Lannisters nor the Boltons may still be standing if/when Riverrun came into play.
Image

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 4:43 am
by Bammer
Simple Torture wrote:Changing the subject: does anyone actually believe that the Iron Throne and whose butt sits on it will matter much to the endgame of the series at all? The more and more I think about it (and this idea isn't totally original to me, it's more like an amalgamation of many threads picked up from many theories), the more I'm convinced that Westeros and the Seven Kingdoms will be unrecognizable when the dust clears, and that all the ink that's been spilled over who has the right to the throne, who has the best claim to the throne, etc. will have been wasted, since there won't be a throne to sit on or a kingdom to rule in the end. Thoughts?
Dragons vs. Night's King in the end.

Humans irrelevant.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 5:53 am
by MitchCumstein
Mecca wrote:
Coach wrote:
Mecca wrote:
MitchCumstein wrote:Yeah, but in a show with a ton of source material to work with, they just show this kid a bit too much for my liking.
Ollie becomes king on the iron throne in the books
Yeah, use the spoiler tag. Don't know if it's true or not, but there's a thread for spoilers from the book.
guys, i love this post from a year ago
In my defense, I'm not a book reader and they weren't very subtle with the Ollie character arc.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 7:16 am
by BurtReynolds
Mecca wrote:and burt considers himself a creative type :shake:
i coulda done it better.

like I said, not a dealbreaker, but not great.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 12:19 pm
by jwfocker
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:too convenient. Sorry.
I'd be on board with this if it was a deus ex machina that came out of fucking nowhere--if it either went against the logic of the universe or was played just for shock value; like, say, a fan theory like (yes, this is an actual theory) the Faceless Man training Arya turns out to be Ned Stark (because a Faceless Man was hired to take Ned's place at the execution and he's been secretly training in Braavos ever since, obviously). But when it comes to Jon's resurrection, the show has spent five seasons slowly and carefully setting this up, getting all of the right pieces into place, so it wasn't meant to be a surprise or a plot twist. What matters for Jon, obviously, is what happens next, not so much the fact that he came back from the dead in a fire god ceremony (that matters more for Melisandre's arc).
this guy gets it

:thumbsup:

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 12:42 pm
by Kaius
I think we will end up with a Stark back in Winterfell and a Targaryen* in King's Landing. I'm much less sure about Dorne, the Riverlands, the Reach, the Iron Islands, and the Vale.