Red Mosquito

Bi_3 wrote:More bad news. Looks like all the stolen nuke codes were, in fact, not nuke codes:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... documents/

epilogue wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:More bad news. Looks like all the stolen nuke codes were, in fact, not nuke codes:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... documents/

Man, you really are the king of bill of goods posting

simple schoolboy wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:More bad news. Looks like all the stolen nuke codes were, in fact, not nuke codes:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... documents/

Man, you really are the king of bill of goods posting

No, the original reporting was intentionally vague enough to be interpreted as possibly being US nuclear secrets. Relating to Iran or China could be stuff as mundane as mass of enriched material or number of warheads, respectively. Kind of an important clarification.

How many talking heads were recklessly speculating that Trump was trying to sell nuclear secrets to the highest bidder?

simple schoolboy wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:More bad news. Looks like all the stolen nuke codes were, in fact, not nuke codes:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... documents/

Man, you really are the king of bill of goods posting

No, the original reporting was intentionally vague enough to be interpreted as possibly being US nuclear secrets. Relating to Iran or China could be stuff as mundane as mass of enriched material or number of warheads, respectively. Kind of an important clarification.

How many talking heads were recklessly speculating that Trump was trying to sell nuclear secrets to the highest bidder?

Bi_3 wrote:

simple schoolboy wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:More bad news. Looks like all the stolen nuke codes were, in fact, not nuke codes:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... documents/

Man, you really are the king of bill of goods posting

No, the original reporting was intentionally vague enough to be interpreted as possibly being US nuclear secrets. Relating to Iran or China could be stuff as mundane as mass of enriched material or number of warheads, respectively. Kind of an important clarification.

How many talking heads were recklessly speculating that Trump was trying to sell nuclear secrets to the highest bidder?

The thing is that Trump has done actual bad things that should disqualify him from office, including illegally take classified docs, but the media making shit up to feed delusional blue-teamers and sell ads just creates public distrust in the DOJ/FBI and compromises their ability to get him for the bad shit he has done. Just let him go.

B wrote:How many newspapers do you subscribe to Bi? I think you've never posted an article that wasn't behind a paywall.

simple schoolboy wrote:

B wrote:How many newspapers do you subscribe to Bi? I think you've never posted an article that wasn't behind a paywall.

I think if you work for a DC adjacent think-tank or defense contractor your employer gives you a free log-in. You are too far from the belly of the beast for such a perk.

BurtReynolds wrote:

simple schoolboy wrote:

B wrote:How many newspapers do you subscribe to Bi? I think you've never posted an article that wasn't behind a paywall.

I think if you work for a DC adjacent think-tank or defense contractor your employer gives you a free log-in. You are too far from the belly of the beast for such a perk.

Lincoln Project perk.

simple schoolboy wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

simple schoolboy wrote:

B wrote:How many newspapers do you subscribe to Bi? I think you've never posted an article that wasn't behind a paywall.

I think if you work for a DC adjacent think-tank or defense contractor your employer gives you a free log-in. You are too far from the belly of the beast for such a perk.

Lincoln Project perk.

I thought that was an endless stream of bi_3-curious interns.

Bi_3 wrote:

simple schoolboy wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

simple schoolboy wrote:

B wrote:How many newspapers do you subscribe to Bi? I think you've never posted an article that wasn't behind a paywall.

I think if you work for a DC adjacent think-tank or defense contractor your employer gives you a free log-in. You are too far from the belly of the beast for such a perk.

Lincoln Project perk.

I thought that was an endless stream of bi_3-curious interns.

4/5 wrote:Former president and current presidential candidate: Terminate the Constitution.

Everybody: shrugs.

I guess we're all finally completely numb to him?

4/5 wrote:Hoping that's fake.