Red Mosquito

Bi_3 wrote:First presidential debate scheduled for November 8th:

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/08/0 ... x-00109577

simple schoolboy wrote:

96583UP wrote:Newsom v. DeSantis appears to be happening lol

i apologise for my prior anti-Newsom in the thread talk comments

this is peculiar

Is there a precedent for this? Candidate that hasn't officially announced debating.

McParadigm wrote:

simple schoolboy wrote:

96583UP wrote:Newsom v. DeSantis appears to be happening lol

i apologise for my prior anti-Newsom in the thread talk comments

this is peculiar

Is there a precedent for this? Candidate that hasn't officially announced debating.

Who cares?

spike wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

simple schoolboy wrote:

96583UP wrote:Newsom v. DeSantis appears to be happening lol

i apologise for my prior anti-Newsom in the thread talk comments

this is peculiar

Is there a precedent for this? Candidate that hasn't officially announced debating.

Who cares?

But soon for a Dem v Repub debate as well.

McParadigm wrote:

spike wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

simple schoolboy wrote:

96583UP wrote:Newsom v. DeSantis appears to be happening lol

i apologise for my prior anti-Newsom in the thread talk comments

this is peculiar

Is there a precedent for this? Candidate that hasn't officially announced debating.

Who cares?

But soon for a Dem v Repub debate as well.

I mean who cares if there’s a precedent for two politicians who publicly wish they were president choosing to debate in the public sphere? A declaration isn’t a permit to have debates. Also, it’s useful: no one gains shit from a debate anymore, so the act of signing up for this alone reenforces that they are not ready for the presidency.

tragabigzanda wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

spike wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

simple schoolboy wrote:

96583UP wrote:Newsom v. DeSantis appears to be happening lol

i apologise for my prior anti-Newsom in the thread talk comments

this is peculiar

Is there a precedent for this? Candidate that hasn't officially announced debating.

Who cares?

But soon for a Dem v Repub debate as well.

I mean who cares if there’s a precedent for two politicians who publicly wish they were president choosing to debate in the public sphere? A declaration isn’t a permit to have debates. Also, it’s useful: no one gains shit from a debate anymore, so the act of signing up for this alone reenforces that they are not ready for the presidency.

?? I'd say Trump gained about about a million polling points after the first debate prior to 2016

tragabigzanda wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

spike wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

simple schoolboy wrote:

96583UP wrote:Newsom v. DeSantis appears to be happening lol

i apologise for my prior anti-Newsom in the thread talk comments

this is peculiar

Is there a precedent for this? Candidate that hasn't officially announced debating.

Who cares?

But soon for a Dem v Repub debate as well.

I mean who cares if there’s a precedent for two politicians who publicly wish they were president choosing to debate in the public sphere? A declaration isn’t a permit to have debates. Also, it’s useful: no one gains shit from a debate anymore, so the act of signing up for this alone reenforces that they are not ready for the presidency.

?? I'd say Trump gained about about a million polling points after the first debate prior to 2016

E.H. Ruddock wrote:Do not talk bad about her. I’ll cut you

NYT wrote:Two law professors active in the Federalist Society wrote that the original meaning of the 14th Amendment makes Donald Trump ineligible to hold government office.