Re: Waiting For Stevie
Posted: Wed April 24, 2024 2:09 am
Who'd thought that a name with such a stupid name would be so amazing, huh
really? that is awesomeB wrote:My vinyl etching says, "Thank you, Stevie, for running late."
I don’t agree with that at all. I was 18-20 in the early 90s and I understood what he was saying perfectly.Spinsoft wrote:I think that what Stip wrote about in his WFS review can only be understood by people who were just 14-15 years old in the early 90s.
I mean, by people who grew up musically and emotionally with Pearl Jam and with the Seattle music scene from the very beginning. By people like Stip - and like me for example
I mean I do think it's a great song in its own right, but I was 16 when I got into Pearl Jam. I think if that Ten era Eddie is what got you into the band - especially if you were alive for that era, but also if it is just what drew you in at a later date (like, say Andrew Watt), Stevie is activating something very specific. If that's not your favorite mode of Pearl Jam it can still be a great song (it is!) but I think you're less likely to have that kind of reaction. Or if you do, it's solely on the strength of the song.wease wrote:I don’t agree with that at all. I was 18-20 in the early 90s and I understood what he was saying perfectly.Spinsoft wrote:I think that what Stip wrote about in his WFS review can only be understood by people who were just 14-15 years old in the early 90s.
I mean, by people who grew up musically and emotionally with Pearl Jam and with the Seattle music scene from the very beginning. By people like Stip - and like me for example
You realize I said I actually DID say I understood it, right?stip wrote:I mean I do think it's a great song in its own right, but I was 16 when I got into Pearl Jam. I think if that Ten era Eddie is what got you into the band - especially if you were alive for that era, but also if it is just what drew you in at a later date (like, say Andrew Watt), Stevie is activating something very specific. If that's not your favorite mode of Pearl Jam it can still be a great song (it is!) but I think you're less likely to have that kind of reaction. Or if you do, it's solely on the strength of the song.wease wrote:I don’t agree with that at all. I was 18-20 in the early 90s and I understood what he was saying perfectly.Spinsoft wrote:I think that what Stip wrote about in his WFS review can only be understood by people who were just 14-15 years old in the early 90s.
I mean, by people who grew up musically and emotionally with Pearl Jam and with the Seattle music scene from the very beginning. By people like Stip - and like me for example
that's the cutestMatters wrote:My 3 year old daughter and I have been singing “be mighty, be humble, be mighty humble” together over and over again.