Page 16 of 251
Re: NHL Thread
Posted: Fri March 15, 2013 8:13 pm
by southp
I'm not a fan of the realignment. The Panthers and Lighting shouldn't be with the Northeast teams.
Come to think of it, the Panthers shouldn't even be a team.
Re: NHL Thread
Posted: Fri March 15, 2013 8:14 pm
by @SkitchP
I love the realignment. i LUV AT
Re: NHL Thread
Posted: Fri March 15, 2013 8:14 pm
by Norah
It'll be fun playing Detroit a whole bunch.
Re: NHL Thread
Posted: Fri March 15, 2013 8:15 pm
by @SkitchP
cutuphalfdead wrote:It'll be fun playing Detroit a whole bunch.
because they're a mediocre team now?
Re: NHL Thread
Posted: Fri March 15, 2013 8:17 pm
by Norah
@SkitchP wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:It'll be fun playing Detroit a whole bunch.
because they're a mediocre team now?
Because they're an original 6 team.
Re: NHL Thread
Posted: Fri March 15, 2013 8:18 pm
by @SkitchP
cutuphalfdead wrote:@SkitchP wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:It'll be fun playing Detroit a whole bunch.
because they're a mediocre team now?
Because they're an original 6 team.

Re: NHL Thread
Posted: Fri March 15, 2013 8:19 pm
by Norah
@SkitchP wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:@SkitchP wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:It'll be fun playing Detroit a whole bunch.
because they're a mediocre team now?
Because they're an original 6 team.

4 of which are in the same division. Love it.
Re: NHL Thread
Posted: Fri March 15, 2013 8:22 pm
by @SkitchP
Im really excited to see a lot less Columbus and Nashville.
Re: NHL Thread
Posted: Fri March 15, 2013 8:24 pm
by Norah
The Florida teams do look a bit out of place. Maybe it would have been better to put them in the D division and move one of the NY teams and one of the PA teams into C.
Re: NHL Thread
Posted: Fri March 15, 2013 8:25 pm
by MattA75
cutuphalfdead wrote:The Florida teams do look a bit out of place. Maybe it would have been better to put them in the D division and move one of the NY teams and one of the PA teams into C.
Patrick Division should be left alone...the Florida teams are a small price to pay to have 4 of the 6 original 6 teams in one division
Re: NHL Thread
Posted: Fri March 15, 2013 8:26 pm
by Norah
MattA75 wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:The Florida teams do look a bit out of place. Maybe it would have been better to put them in the D division and move one of the NY teams and one of the PA teams into C.
Patrick Division should be left alone...the Florida teams are a small price to pay to have 4 of the 6 original 6 teams in one division
You could still have the 4 original 6 teams without taking the Florida teams. In fact, with my proposal you could have 5.
Re: NHL Thread
Posted: Fri March 15, 2013 8:51 pm
by MattA75
cutuphalfdead wrote:MattA75 wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:The Florida teams do look a bit out of place. Maybe it would have been better to put them in the D division and move one of the NY teams and one of the PA teams into C.
Patrick Division should be left alone...the Florida teams are a small price to pay to have 4 of the 6 original 6 teams in one division
You could still have the 4 original 6 teams without taking the Florida teams. In fact, with my proposal you could have 5.
Rangers rivalries are with NYI, NJ, and PHI, and to a lesser degree WAS and PIT
Re: NHL Thread
Posted: Fri March 15, 2013 9:03 pm
by Norah
MattA75 wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:MattA75 wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:The Florida teams do look a bit out of place. Maybe it would have been better to put them in the D division and move one of the NY teams and one of the PA teams into C.
Patrick Division should be left alone...the Florida teams are a small price to pay to have 4 of the 6 original 6 teams in one division
You could still have the 4 original 6 teams without taking the Florida teams. In fact, with my proposal you could have 5.
Rangers rivalries are with NYI, NJ, and PHI, and to a lesser degree WAS and PIT
Which is probably why it was done the way it was.
Re: NHL Thread
Posted: Sat March 16, 2013 6:42 pm
by MattA75
Ribeiro's such a fucking pussy
Re: NHL Thread
Posted: Sat March 16, 2013 6:52 pm
by elliseamos
it looked like marshmond got a few good shots in, but those two fights were weak sauce.
Re: NHL Thread
Posted: Sat March 16, 2013 8:24 pm
by numbers
I love Hendricks refusing to fight Thornton and then jumping at McQuaid as Thornton is chasing him, like McQuaid is some chump.
Re: NHL Thread
Posted: Sat March 16, 2013 11:33 pm
by elliseamos
numbers wrote:I love Hendricks refusing to fight Thornton and then jumping at McQuaid as Thornton is chasing him, like McQuaid is some chump.
and then whining to security when a fan had something to say to him whilst going to the Caps locker room. that team is pretty soft, i really thought they would be better this year (considering what they did against the Bs last year in the playoffs).
Re: NHL Thread
Posted: Sun March 17, 2013 6:17 am
by philpritchard
MattA75 wrote:Ribeiro's such a fucking pussy
I like how Marchand goes after Ribeiro, who has no career fights in over 750 games and clearly had no interest in fighting, and Ribeiro is the pussy.

Maybe I missed something else that you're referring to, but Marchand is definitely the pussy in that one.
Re: NHL Thread
Posted: Sun March 17, 2013 11:33 am
by numbers
Marchand never fights either, and even though ribiero hasn't fought in hundreds of games, I'm sure he's been challenged to a fight hundreds of times. Maybe he's a pussy because hell only fight someone like Marchand.
Re: NHL Thread
Posted: Sun March 17, 2013 1:37 pm
by elliseamos
i don't know about that statement, but Marchand had just been stood up by Ovi and as he came off the boards Marchand bumped into Ribiero and knowing who he was started things up. they're both pests, they both answered the call.