Re: The band's biggest mistake
Posted: Fri March 22, 2013 8:39 pm
i love last kiss
2013 pearl jam would go out of their way for that kinda crossover success. see: the fixer.bodysnatcher wrote:the Last Kiss thing was so bizarre. if 2013 Pearl Jam put out Last Kiss, it wouldn't make me flinch. But that it happened to '98 Pearl Jam... that's what was so strange to me
Very good point. And they didn't half-ass the video either.stip wrote:lest we forget, there were commercials for Yield in 1998, and their first video in 6 years.
Yeah, but that commercial was awesome instead of an embarrassment.stip wrote:lest we forget, there were commercials for Yield in 1998, and their first video in 6 years.
cutuphalfdead wrote:Yeah, but that commercial was awesome instead of an embarrassment.stip wrote:lest we forget, there were commercials for Yield in 1998, and their first video in 6 years.
Well, to be fair the Yield commercial was for Yield, not for Yield and K-Mart.stip wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:Yeah, but that commercial was awesome instead of an embarrassment.stip wrote:lest we forget, there were commercials for Yield in 1998, and their first video in 6 years.
if people spent their time bitching about how the target commercial wasn't very good, rather than bitching about the fact that it existed, I'd be a happier man
Stupid argument. Plenty of bands thrive in the modern music environment without doing an awful commercial like that.VinylGuy wrote:yeah they were different.
Still i wasn´t surprised about the Target commercial. It was a part of the deal they made, and the fact is they release the record themselves with Target as a partner, like Sony in their past.
The difference is that record labels almost dont exist anymore and big retail places like Target are the new Business partners.
i get that for an old fan this hurts, the same with the oracle show, the main fact is i think they are as independent now as they were in the 90s or maybe more.
and others dont. Why is "stupid" my argument? its just my point of view..i can be mistaken, but stupid?cutuphalfdead wrote:Stupid argument. Plenty of bands thrive in the modern music environment without doing an awful commercial like that.VinylGuy wrote:yeah they were different.
Still i wasn´t surprised about the Target commercial. It was a part of the deal they made, and the fact is they release the record themselves with Target as a partner, like Sony in their past.
The difference is that record labels almost dont exist anymore and big retail places like Target are the new Business partners.
i get that for an old fan this hurts, the same with the oracle show, the main fact is i think they are as independent now as they were in the 90s or maybe more.
No one is saying they are or ever were Fugazi. But there are plenty out there who when the Target deal/ad dropped and the Oracle show was announced were complete apologists saying that it's a new music environment and this is how you survive, and that's a load of horse shit. Pearl Jam does what's convenient for them, even if the end result is far less than ideal. It's shown in their approach to their music and in the way they run themselves as a business.VinylGuy wrote:and others dont. Why is "stupid" my argument? its just my point of view..i can be mistaken, but stupid?cutuphalfdead wrote:Stupid argument. Plenty of bands thrive in the modern music environment without doing an awful commercial like that.VinylGuy wrote:yeah they were different.
Still i wasn´t surprised about the Target commercial. It was a part of the deal they made, and the fact is they release the record themselves with Target as a partner, like Sony in their past.
The difference is that record labels almost dont exist anymore and big retail places like Target are the new Business partners.
i get that for an old fan this hurts, the same with the oracle show, the main fact is i think they are as independent now as they were in the 90s or maybe more.
They made a deal that included a target commercial for THEIR record. It was the same video they shoot for their single, with some Target logos.
I get Stip point about the Yield commercial and i dont think its the same situation here, but its very similar.
Guess some old pj fans are still thinking about this band as they were Fugazi. They never were Fugazi and they are not Kiss either.
cutuphalfdead wrote:Yeah, but that commercial was awesome instead of an embarrassment.stip wrote:lest we forget, there were commercials for Yield in 1998, and their first video in 6 years.
well i dont agree. And my points are up there.cutuphalfdead wrote:No one is saying they are or ever were Fugazi. But there are plenty out there who when the Target deal/ad dropped and the Oracle show was announced were complete apologists saying that it's a new music environment and this is how you survive, and that's a load of horse shit. Pearl Jam does what's convenient for them, even if the end result is far less than ideal. It's shown in their approach to their music and in the way they run themselves as a business.VinylGuy wrote:and others dont. Why is "stupid" my argument? its just my point of view..i can be mistaken, but stupid?cutuphalfdead wrote:Stupid argument. Plenty of bands thrive in the modern music environment without doing an awful commercial like that.VinylGuy wrote:yeah they were different.
Still i wasn´t surprised about the Target commercial. It was a part of the deal they made, and the fact is they release the record themselves with Target as a partner, like Sony in their past.
The difference is that record labels almost dont exist anymore and big retail places like Target are the new Business partners.
i get that for an old fan this hurts, the same with the oracle show, the main fact is i think they are as independent now as they were in the 90s or maybe more.
They made a deal that included a target commercial for THEIR record. It was the same video they shoot for their single, with some Target logos.
I get Stip point about the Yield commercial and i dont think its the same situation here, but its very similar.
Guess some old pj fans are still thinking about this band as they were Fugazi. They never were Fugazi and they are not Kiss either.