Page 16 of 44

Re: Justice League (2017)

Posted: Fri November 10, 2017 5:12 am
by epilogue
theplatypus wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Oh. Does it remind you of Baman Piderman? Is that why?
It reminds me of Batman. It's brutish and bulky and kind of beastly. I prefer it over the sleek Matrix-y body armor thing that Nolan gave us.
I don't... That's not at all what I'm... is this thing on?

Re: Justice League (2017)

Posted: Fri November 10, 2017 5:24 am
by Jorge
Maybe it's just... I mean, what if the point is... can I just even... I mean... ?!?

Re: Justice League (2017)

Posted: Fri November 10, 2017 5:28 am
by Jorge
Do I even... or is it just... I mean... is it perhaps even possible that... can they legally... ???

Re: Justice League (2017)

Posted: Fri November 10, 2017 5:30 am
by Jorge
T-- testing *taps megaphone* HELLO, IS IT *MEGAPHONE FEEDBACK* ow, can-- hel... CAN Wwe TALK ab *more feedback* HELLO? HELLO? CAN I EVEN? HELLO?

Re: Justice League (2017)

Posted: Fri November 10, 2017 6:00 pm
by B

Re: Justice League (2017)

Posted: Fri November 10, 2017 6:01 pm
by Jorge
Great

Re: Justice League (2017)

Posted: Fri November 10, 2017 6:03 pm
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.

Re: Justice League (2017)

Posted: Fri November 10, 2017 7:26 pm
by bada
Everyone is saying flawed but fun. Way to cover both bases until the mob speaks.

Re: Justice League (2017)

Posted: Wed November 15, 2017 3:21 pm
by Jorge
The headlines for all the reviews coming out are hilarious

One of them is literally just "Justice League Is Not as Bad as Batman v Superman"

Re: Justice League (2017)

Posted: Wed November 15, 2017 3:30 pm
by Jorge
This line will make LV's blood boil
One only has to recall for a moment the rich images that Christopher Nolan and Wally Pfister consistently created for the Dark Knight trilogy to realize how far these Superman films are from any kind of pictorial distinction.

Re: Justice League (2017)

Posted: Wed November 15, 2017 8:06 pm
by LoathedVermin72
theplatypus wrote:This line will make LV's blood boil
One only has to recall for a moment the rich images that Christopher Nolan and Wally Pfister consistently created for the Dark Knight trilogy to realize how far these Superman films are from any kind of pictorial distinction.
This might be the funniest thing I've ever read. It's so funny that I'm not even laughing. I feel like Cartman in that episode where he thinks he breaks his sense of humor because what he saw was just too funny.

Re: Justice League (2017)

Posted: Wed November 15, 2017 8:16 pm
by dimejinky99
The rotten tomatoes score leaked. Who even cares? Critics are assholes anyways.

Re: Justice League (2017)

Posted: Wed November 15, 2017 9:27 pm
by epilogue
But are they bigger assholes than Jorge?

Re: Justice League (2017)

Posted: Wed November 15, 2017 9:33 pm
by bune
dimejinky99 wrote:The rotten tomatoes score leaked. Who even cares? Critics are assholes anyways.
Of course it leaked. Who thought it wouldn't?

Re: Justice League (2017)

Posted: Wed November 15, 2017 9:47 pm
by BurtReynolds
the reviews are terrible, not that it matters.

Re: Justice League (2017)

Posted: Wed November 15, 2017 9:53 pm
by epilogue
All the reviews I've seen have been "not great, kinda fun, way better than BvS." But I haven't seen any terrible reviews yet. Not that it matters. I have no interest in seeing this movie.

Re: Justice League (2017)

Posted: Thu November 16, 2017 12:01 am
by Peeps
i will definitely say it but have stayed away from any spoilers thus far

could care less what others think of it ill see it for myself and not let any preconceived wanker ruin it

Re: Justice League (2017)

Posted: Thu November 16, 2017 12:03 am
by epilogue
I like to read reviews for movies that I don't really care about. But, yeah, if I was excited for this movie, I too would be avoiding reviews until after I've seen it. But reviews are always more interesting/meaningful to me after I've seen a movie. A good review should add to/challenge my thoughts on a film, not decide my thoughts on a film.

Re: Justice League (2017)

Posted: Thu November 16, 2017 12:25 am
by Peeps
i wish i could say id like to dry hump you but there would be nothing dry about it

Re: Justice League (2017)

Posted: Thu November 16, 2017 12:52 am
by epilogue
:li: