Page 151 of 252

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Mon February 22, 2016 2:59 am
by philpritchard
Mecca wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Man, where will Stamkos end up next year?
If you ask your average Leafs fan, they'll tell you.
Buffalo?
He'll be close to a deal with Buffalo, then at the last minute he'll sign with the Leafs. The Buffalo media is gonna be piiiiissed.

I actually don't know that he makes much sense for the Leafs at this point. It would be tempting, but if it takes $10+ million for seven years? I just don't know...

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Mon February 22, 2016 2:05 pm
by chuck taylor
philpritchard wrote:
Mecca wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Man, where will Stamkos end up next year?
If you ask your average Leafs fan, they'll tell you.
Buffalo?
He'll be close to a deal with Buffalo, then at the last minute he'll sign with the Leafs. The Buffalo media is gonna be piiiiissed.

I actually don't know that he makes much sense for the Leafs at this point. It would be tempting, but if it takes $10+ million for seven years? I just don't know...
Yea, Pegula will probably offer him a ridiculous amount, and he'll either take it or use it as a bargaining chip to get similar money elsewhere, like in Toronto. Either way, I think he'll be overpaid when this all shakes out. He's really good, but his elite goal-scoring peak is probably already behind him.

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Mon February 22, 2016 3:00 pm
by philpritchard
chuck taylor wrote:Yea, Pegula will probably offer him a ridiculous amount, and he'll either take it or use it as a bargaining chip to get similar money elsewhere, like in Toronto. Either way, I think he'll be overpaid when this all shakes out. He's really good, but his elite goal-scoring peak is probably already behind him.
This management team in Toronto doesn't strike me as the type to get into a bidding war. I think they would be more likely to set a valuation on a player and stick to it, regardless of what other teams are offering.

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Mon February 22, 2016 3:07 pm
by chuck taylor
philpritchard wrote:
chuck taylor wrote:Yea, Pegula will probably offer him a ridiculous amount, and he'll either take it or use it as a bargaining chip to get similar money elsewhere, like in Toronto. Either way, I think he'll be overpaid when this all shakes out. He's really good, but his elite goal-scoring peak is probably already behind him.
This management team in Toronto doesn't strike me as the type to get into a bidding war. I think they would be more likely to set a valuation on a player and stick to it, regardless of what other teams are offering.
Yea, that's a good point. I just meant to say I think Stamkos will end up getting too much money wherever he signs.

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Mon February 22, 2016 3:40 pm
by philpritchard
chuck taylor wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
chuck taylor wrote:Yea, Pegula will probably offer him a ridiculous amount, and he'll either take it or use it as a bargaining chip to get similar money elsewhere, like in Toronto. Either way, I think he'll be overpaid when this all shakes out. He's really good, but his elite goal-scoring peak is probably already behind him.
This management team in Toronto doesn't strike me as the type to get into a bidding war. I think they would be more likely to set a valuation on a player and stick to it, regardless of what other teams are offering.
Yea, that's a good point. I just meant to say I think Stamkos will end up getting too much money wherever he signs.
Most elite offensive players seem to get overpaid when they hit free agency, so probably.

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Tue February 23, 2016 12:50 pm
by chuck taylor
Any predictions for Calder finalists? A lot of talk about considering Panarin's age/experience in the voting. I think it's gonna be Panarin, Gostisbehere and Eichel (edging out Larkin down the stretch), in that order.

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Tue February 23, 2016 2:22 pm
by philpritchard
chuck taylor wrote:Any predictions for Calder finalists? A lot of talk about considering Panarin's age/experience in the voting. I think it's gonna be Panarin, Gostisbehere and Eichel (edging out Larkin down the stretch), in that order.
Sounds about right. Domi's having basically the exact same season as Eichel, so he'll be in the mix too. McDavid could get back into the discussion if he scores at the same pace for the next 20-ish games, but it kind of has to be Panarin at this point.

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Wed February 24, 2016 9:01 am
by Dev
Sens are on a 4-game winning streak.

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Wed February 24, 2016 2:49 pm
by chuck taylor
Dev wrote:Sens are on a 4-game winning streak.
With 20+ games left, they're still right in the playoff race.

And holy crap, I just looked at the league standings for the first time in a while. I knew the Caps were having a really good year, but I didn't realize the extent of it until now.

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Wed February 24, 2016 3:20 pm
by philpritchard
Dev wrote:Sens are on a 4-game winning streak.
I know it's the nature of sports fandom, but I find it hilarious that the few Sens fans I know were so quick to switch from "BAHAHA Phaneuf is a useless pylon and you're stuck with him for four more years for a ton of money!" to "Good trade. Solid addition to the team. He makes us a lot better."

He became so undervalued on the Leafs and around the league. He's a really good defenseman.

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Thu February 25, 2016 4:00 am
by Mecca
philpritchard wrote:
Dev wrote:Sens are on a 4-game winning streak.
I know it's the nature of sports fandom, but I find it hilarious that the few Sens fans I know were so quick to switch from "BAHAHA Phaneuf is a useless pylon and you're stuck with him for four more years for a ton of money!" to "Good trade. Solid addition to the team. He makes us a lot better."

He became so undervalued on the Leafs and around the league. He's a really good defenseman.
he definitely works better on a 2nd pairing

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Thu February 25, 2016 6:06 am
by Mecca
Kesler really does get away with a lot it seems after watching a Ducks game this season

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Thu February 25, 2016 6:36 pm
by Dev
Kesler, like half of the Ducks, is a POS. Biggest douche bag team in the league.

Phili and Boston are always up there, too.

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Tue March 01, 2016 1:34 am
by Dev
Not much to report at trade deadline, eh?

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Tue March 01, 2016 2:24 am
by philpritchard
Dev wrote:Not much to report at trade deadline, eh?
It was an exciting few days/weeks leading up to the deadline, but holy crap today was boring.

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Wed March 02, 2016 5:12 am
by Dev
Who do you guys think are the most exciting teams to watch?

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Wed March 02, 2016 2:24 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Dev wrote:Who do you guys think are the most exciting teams to watch?
Washington

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Wed March 02, 2016 2:44 pm
by Mecca
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Dev wrote:Who do you guys think are the most exciting teams to watch?
Washington
They're pretty good.

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Wed March 02, 2016 2:47 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Mecca wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Dev wrote:Who do you guys think are the most exciting teams to watch?
Washington
They're pretty good.
Yes, and fun to watch.

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Wed March 02, 2016 4:16 pm
by Peeps
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Mecca wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Dev wrote:Who do you guys think are the most exciting teams to watch?
Washington
They're pretty good.
Yes, and fun to watch.
:gomez: