Page 153 of 199
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed January 26, 2022 7:40 pm
by simple schoolboy
BurtReynolds wrote:4/5 wrote:Biden has pledged to nominate a black woman to replace Breyer.
Rachel Dolezal set to make history.
It'dq be a good way to resolve the Kamala Harris issue.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed January 26, 2022 8:03 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed January 26, 2022 8:08 pm
by B
4/5 wrote:Why not B?
Why not 7 Justices?
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed January 26, 2022 9:08 pm
by Mickey
tragabigzanda wrote:
I hate lesser evil voting but I continue to do it. Mitt Romney would break me though.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed January 26, 2022 9:08 pm
by Mickey
I mean this is obviously fucking farce and is never going to happen but the way the media class pines for a unity ticket is so funny, considering it's probably the one thing the Democrats could do to make me give up entirely.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed January 26, 2022 9:09 pm
by Mickey
Anyway by 2024 I hope to be solidly across the northern border and will immediately pivot to being a "BUILD THAT WALL" guy, so perhaps it's immaterial.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed January 26, 2022 9:14 pm
by B
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed January 26, 2022 10:47 pm
by Mickey
It would be peak Democrat to wait on this in order to try to make the midterm election a referendum on the Supreme Court and then eat shit anyway.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed January 26, 2022 10:47 pm
by elliseamos
F that! Didn't ACB take like 27 days?!
Michelle Obama to the court for the win!
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed January 26, 2022 11:25 pm
by surfndestroy
tragabigzanda wrote:
And I thought I did good drugs.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu January 27, 2022 3:57 pm
by B
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu January 27, 2022 4:20 pm
by Mickey
The guiding assumption of that tweet is that no one who reads it listens to the audio.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu January 27, 2022 4:20 pm
by Mickey
Women be questionin' though!
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu January 27, 2022 4:22 pm
by 4/5
Mickey wrote:The guiding assumption of that tweet is that no one who reads it listens to the audio.
And that the audio hasn't always been available anyway. Now it's just live.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu January 27, 2022 4:24 pm
by Bammer
elliseamos wrote:F that! Didn't ACB take like 27 days?!
Michelle Obama to the court for the win!
I honestly don’t know so I am asking: Does Michelle Obama have the requisite law degree or whatever other qualifications are necessary?
(I have no idea what qualifications are necessary)
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu January 27, 2022 4:25 pm
by Simple Torture
Bammer wrote:elliseamos wrote:F that! Didn't ACB take like 27 days?!
Michelle Obama to the court for the win!
I honestly don’t know so I am asking: Does Michelle Obama have the requisite law degree or whatever other qualifications are necessary?
(I have no idea what qualifications are necessary)
I believe that technically no qualifications are necessary.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu January 27, 2022 4:26 pm
by Bammer
Simple Torture wrote:Bammer wrote:elliseamos wrote:F that! Didn't ACB take like 27 days?!
Michelle Obama to the court for the win!
I honestly don’t know so I am asking: Does Michelle Obama have the requisite law degree or whatever other qualifications are necessary?
(I have no idea what qualifications are necessary)
I believe that technically no qualifications are necessary.
Wow, now that is really something.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu January 27, 2022 4:27 pm
by 4/5
Bammer wrote:Simple Torture wrote:Bammer wrote:elliseamos wrote:F that! Didn't ACB take like 27 days?!
Michelle Obama to the court for the win!
I honestly don’t know so I am asking: Does Michelle Obama have the requisite law degree or whatever other qualifications are necessary?
(I have no idea what qualifications are necessary)
I believe that technically no qualifications are necessary.
Wow, now that is really something.
The qualification is that a president nominates you and the Senate confirms. Unless the Senate is recessed, in which case the only requirement is that the president nominates you.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu January 27, 2022 4:27 pm
by Simple Torture
Bammer wrote:Simple Torture wrote:Bammer wrote:elliseamos wrote:F that! Didn't ACB take like 27 days?!
Michelle Obama to the court for the win!
I honestly don’t know so I am asking: Does Michelle Obama have the requisite law degree or whatever other qualifications are necessary?
(I have no idea what qualifications are necessary)
I believe that technically no qualifications are necessary.
Wow, now that is really something.
Recall that W nominated someone who had never served as a judge (Harriet Miers), although she withdrew before any formal proceedings took place.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu January 27, 2022 4:28 pm
by Simple Torture
4/5 wrote:Bammer wrote:Simple Torture wrote:Bammer wrote:elliseamos wrote:F that! Didn't ACB take like 27 days?!
Michelle Obama to the court for the win!
I honestly don’t know so I am asking: Does Michelle Obama have the requisite law degree or whatever other qualifications are necessary?
(I have no idea what qualifications are necessary)
I believe that technically no qualifications are necessary.
Wow, now that is really something.
The qualification is that a president nominates you and the Senate confirms. Unless the Senate is recessed, in which case the only requirement is that the president nominates you.
So technically the president could nominate bammer.
