Re: What movies are you watching?
Posted: Sun August 07, 2022 5:57 pm
Overall it ended up feeling like Rick and Morty crossed with "nicecore" and lol wtf le epic bacon reddit-level humor
That's fair.Jorge wrote:Hereditary is funnier than Midsommar (unintentionally) and for that I prefer it.
I don't disagree with any of this.VinylGuy wrote:Midsommar might be the best movie while Hereditary have more reply value maybe?
And damn two moments
-The car moment was a huge wtf.
-The son watching the fire with Toni Collette waiting in the dark in the fucking ceiling.
Yeah the parking lot scene was really well-acted, it honestly felt like it belonged in a better movie. But if you step back and think about the writing in that scene it doesn't make much sense. This more or less captures my response:Jorge wrote:It's a movie that gets worse the more you think about it, I thinkMickey wrote:This was terrible. One of the most tedious, juvenile movies I've seen in years.Mickey wrote:For instance tonight I started Everything Everywhere All At Once, which is a significantly better movie in terms of concept and production and just as bad of an experience.
Going to watch the final hour tomorrow just to see how it ends but so far this feels like a comic book movie for people with MFA degrees.
Great performance from the daughter though, she makes us care about the completely underwritten deal her character is going through
Jorge wrote:Overall it ended up feeling like Rick and Morty crossed with "nicecore" and lol wtf le epic bacon reddit-level humor
Odd as it sounds, I don't actually totally disagree with this either.BurtReynolds wrote:Hereditary seemed like a well made movie, but didn't add up to much for me. It felt like someone dabbling with a lot of different ideas.
i think they’re both very funny, and agree that hereditary’s comedy ain’t intentional. my private theory is the dude read reviews/saw what dour work he made, and made a 180 turnJorge wrote:Hereditary is funnier than Midsommar (unintentionally) and for that I prefer it.
when I first read fred introduce the presupposition, "texts come before us as the always-already-read", it felt like a godly dispensation from seeing movies exactly like this.Mickey wrote:This was terrible. One of the most tedious, juvenile movies I've seen in years.Mickey wrote:For instance tonight I started Everything Everywhere All At Once, which is a significantly better movie in terms of concept and production and just as bad of an experience.
Going to watch the final hour tomorrow just to see how it ends but so far this feels like a comic book movie for people with MFA degrees.
you give too much credit to phd candidates, ash.The Argonaut wrote:I think they were masters-level students. And a pell-mell, unscientific approach to a master's thesis is far from unheard ofMalloy wrote:this is part of why the movie should be read as a really great satireMickey wrote:It's the first movie in history to accurately depict PhD students
see my reply to mickey re fredric jameson. I simultaneously have never seen this movie and have seen this movie countless times.Anders wrote:Why do you dislike it so much?Malloy wrote:and i assume you bought it, anders. insanityJorge wrote:I have asked him like six times and he refuses to answertragabigzanda wrote:Anders wrote:The Bucket Listyou pick the worst movies sometimes. What exactly is your method?
I think overall Fred is correct and there's a way in which the previous reception of this movie (and how it fits into the matrix of what kinds of movies can be made) telegraphed its overall form, but there's also something to be said for witnessing first hand the way a certain (maybe middle class?) psychic reality is served up to its primary audience here, and how it negotiates material limitations to that reality. It was a terrible viewing experience but it is interesting.Malloy wrote:when I first read fred introduce the presupposition, "texts come before us as the always-already-read", it felt like a godly dispensation from seeing movies exactly like this.Mickey wrote:This was terrible. One of the most tedious, juvenile movies I've seen in years.Mickey wrote:For instance tonight I started Everything Everywhere All At Once, which is a significantly better movie in terms of concept and production and just as bad of an experience.
Going to watch the final hour tomorrow just to see how it ends but so far this feels like a comic book movie for people with MFA degrees.
My post is also a satire, you seeMalloy wrote:you give too much credit to phd candidates, ash.The Argonaut wrote:I think they were masters-level students. And a pell-mell, unscientific approach to a master's thesis is far from unheard ofMalloy wrote:this is part of why the movie should be read as a really great satireMickey wrote:It's the first movie in history to accurately depict PhD students
also, why would a kind of verisimilitude -- "actually, MAs do act like this" -- preclude the movie from satirizing them?
I see where you are coming from with this, but I don’t agree with that approach, not seeing the movie, and having a stromg opinion on it.Malloy wrote:see my reply to mickey re fredric jameson. I simultaneously have never seen this movie and have seen this movie countless times.Anders wrote:Why do you dislike it so much?Malloy wrote:and i assume you bought it, anders. insanityJorge wrote:I have asked him like six times and he refuses to answertragabigzanda wrote:Anders wrote:The Bucket Listyou pick the worst movies sometimes. What exactly is your method?

I loved that movie. Five out of five stars from me.The Argonaut wrote:That's the approach that caused a bunch of you guys not to watch The Father. It's nothing like what you think it is. It's really great! Go watch The Father! It had terrible promotional materials because it is a very weird movie and they didn't know what to do with it. Look at this garbage, unrepresentative poster:
I am the only person who loves 12.Anders wrote:Watching the Ocean’s trilogy. On Twelve now.