Re: What movies are you watching?
Posted: Sun August 07, 2022 10:46 pm
12 is better than 8.
but i want to see that one and will one day willThe Argonaut wrote:That's the approach that caused a bunch of you guys not to watch The Father. It's nothing like what you think it is. It's really great! Go watch The Father! It had terrible promotional materials because it is a very weird movie and they didn't know what to do with it. Look at this garbage, unrepresentative poster:
i’m exaggerating a bit. i don’t have a particularly strong opinion about this movie — how could i — beyond buying it sight unseen.Anders wrote:I see where you are coming from with this, but I don’t agree with that approach, not seeing the movie, and having a stromg opinion on it.Malloy wrote:see my reply to mickey re fredric jameson. I simultaneously have never seen this movie and have seen this movie countless times.Anders wrote:Why do you dislike it so much?Malloy wrote:and i assume you bought it, anders. insanityJorge wrote:I have asked him like six times and he refuses to answertragabigzanda wrote:Anders wrote:The Bucket Listyou pick the worst movies sometimes. What exactly is your method?
Not saying you have to see it, or at all that you have to like it.
of course im down with this 100Mickey wrote:I think overall Fred is correct and there's a way in which the previous reception of this movie (and how it fits into the matrix of what kinds of movies can be made) telegraphed its overall form, but there's also something to be said for witnessing first hand the way a certain (maybe middle class?) psychic reality is served up to its primary audience here, and how it negotiates material limitations to that reality. It was a terrible viewing experience but it is interesting.Malloy wrote:when I first read fred introduce the presupposition, "texts come before us as the always-already-read", it felt like a godly dispensation from seeing movies exactly like this.Mickey wrote:This was terrible. One of the most tedious, juvenile movies I've seen in years.Mickey wrote:For instance tonight I started Everything Everywhere All At Once, which is a significantly better movie in terms of concept and production and just as bad of an experience.
Going to watch the final hour tomorrow just to see how it ends but so far this feels like a comic book movie for people with MFA degrees.
or at least complicatedly bad art.Mickey wrote:Sometimes bad art is better than good art.
Yeah for sure. Have you seen the American TV program Yellowstone?Malloy wrote:or at least complicatedly bad art.Mickey wrote:Sometimes bad art is better than good art.
you’re a much better observer of the culture than i am.Mickey wrote:Yeah for sure. Have you seen the American TV program Yellowstone?Malloy wrote:or at least complicatedly bad art.Mickey wrote:Sometimes bad art is better than good art.
I don't really remember what happens in 12. I only remember that it was long and convoluted.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:Joey: Your rebuttal?
The Argonaut wrote:I think the MFAs are cute. I love when they get going like this
I just automatically assume everyone in A&E who talks smart has an MFAMalloy wrote:The Argonaut wrote:I think the MFAs are cute. I love when they get going like this
i would consider an mfa if we exclusively did marxist literary theory
yeah we get to talk movies, it’s the bestThe Argonaut wrote:love this thread