Red Mosquito

wease wrote:

theplatypus wrote:

What a douche.

they gotta build a wall

CNN is trying out primal scream therapy tonight.

CNN released the image of the attacker

What is Erdogan up to? He be acting crazy.

wrong thread I guess, but he is basically the Trump of Turkey.

Turkeytrump.

Turmp

A visual that hits your gastro holes in a very memorable way.

Imagine putting that image into google cardboard and seeing how the faces blend.

"incidental monitoring"

BurtReynolds wrote:"incidental monitoring"

Oh? You were monitoring known Russian agents and recorded me interacting with them "incidentally?" Clearly you were after me.

jesus christ, CNN:

Info "suggests" Trump associates "may" have coordinated with Russians. The FBI has information that "indicates" associates of President Donald Trump communicated with "suspected" Russian operatives to "possibly" coordinate the release of information damaging to Hillary Clinton's campaign, US officials told CNN.

burt, im not sure you understand how investigations work

McParadigm wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:"incidental monitoring"

Oh? You were monitoring known Russian agents and recorded me interacting with them "incidentally?" Clearly you were after me.

It what was done with the information afterwards that is in contention. If, as Eli Lake said last week, the Obama admin lowered the classification and disseminated details of the collection throughout the government before leaving office, there are some serious issues there.

Peeps wrote:burt, im not sure you understand how investigations work

It's highly problematic because it strongly biases public opinion without full understanding of the evidence in order to achieve political goals.

Bi_3 wrote:

Peeps wrote:burt, im not sure you understand how investigations work

It's highly problematic because it strongly biases public opinion without full understanding of the evidence in order to achieve political goals.

Pretty sure we got that obvious point.

jwfocker wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

Peeps wrote:burt, im not sure you understand how investigations work

It's highly problematic because it strongly biases public opinion without full understanding of the evidence in order to achieve political goals.

Pretty sure we got that obvious point.

Doesn't really seem like it, but sure.

That Time magazine interview is something else.

But not as something else as this