Page 157 of 199

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Mon April 18, 2022 4:18 pm
by BurtReynolds
Image

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Mon April 18, 2022 5:56 pm
by elliseamos
Context certainly helps.

The defendant agreed with her and Roberts cut it off:
Spoiler: show
JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: I -- I'm not sure I understand the
distinction why the states would have the power
but the federal government wouldn't.

MR. FLOWERS: The federal government
has no police power if we're asking about that.

JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: Oh, it does have
power with respect to protecting the health and
safety of workers. We have -- we have --
accept the constitutionality of OSHA.

MR. FLOWERS: Yes. I took you to be
asking if they had a police power to protect
public health. They -- they absolutely have
the --

JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: No, they have a
police power to protect workers.

MR. FLOWERS: I would not call it a
police power. I think the Commerce Clause
power allows them to address health -- sorry,
is there a question?

MR. FLOWERS: It allows them to
address health in the context of the workplace.

JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: Exactly.

CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: It's a good
time to move to our sequential questioning.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 1:13 am
by McParadigm
The Supreme Court has voted to strike down the landmark Roe v. Wade decision, according to an initial draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito circulated inside the court and obtained by POLITICO.

The draft opinion is a full-throated, unflinching repudiation of the 1973 decision which guaranteed federal constitutional protections of abortion rights and a subsequent 1992 decision – Planned Parenthood v. Casey – that largely maintained the right.

“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” Alito writes in the document, labeled as the “Opinion of the Court.” “It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.”

Deliberations on controversial cases have in the past been fluid. Justices can and sometimes do change their votes as draft opinions circulate and major decisions can be subject to multiple drafts and vote-trading, sometimes until just days before a decision is unveiled. The court’s holding will not be final until it is published, likely in the next two months.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 1:16 am
by Norah
federal abortion ban coming just as soon as republicans have potus and congress again

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 1:19 am
by Monkey_Driven
Well, we all knew it was coming.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 1:29 am
by elliseamos
Might as well lie back and...

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 1:35 am
by Green Habit
McParadigm wrote:
The Supreme Court has voted to strike down the landmark Roe v. Wade decision, according to an initial draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito circulated inside the court and obtained by POLITICO.

The draft opinion is a full-throated, unflinching repudiation of the 1973 decision which guaranteed federal constitutional protections of abortion rights and a subsequent 1992 decision – Planned Parenthood v. Casey – that largely maintained the right.

“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” Alito writes in the document, labeled as the “Opinion of the Court.” “It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.”

Deliberations on controversial cases have in the past been fluid. Justices can and sometimes do change their votes as draft opinions circulate and major decisions can be subject to multiple drafts and vote-trading, sometimes until just days before a decision is unveiled. The court’s holding will not be final until it is published, likely in the next two months.
Link to the monster 98 page Alito opinion here:

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000180 ... 4f98520000

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 2:12 am
by spike
hope this backfires on the GOP at midterms

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 2:16 am
by simple schoolboy
Norris wrote:federal abortion ban coming just as soon as republicans have potus and congress again
How? They can't even defund Planned Parenthood.

State level is where the action is.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 2:27 am
by ---
we are so back

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 2:28 am
by B
Pack. The. Mother. Fucking. Court.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 2:29 am
by ---
B wrote:Pack. The. Mother. Fucking. Court.
what's your favorite way to terminate a pregnancy?

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 2:31 am
by B
--- wrote:
B wrote:Pack. The. Mother. Fucking. Court.
what's your favorite way to terminate a pregnancy?
Without Alito's input.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 2:32 am
by B
Poor Susan Collins. She must feel very bad.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 2:38 am
by simple schoolboy
Emanations and Penumbras go Brrrr

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 2:39 am
by ---
the real question is does this decision enjoin pregnant men too

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 2:43 am
by simple schoolboy
How often do we get Supreme court leaks like this? Is this a one off or should SCOTUS not expect to draft opinions confidentially going forward?

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 2:54 am
by verb_to_trust
--- wrote:the real question is does this decision enjoin pregnant men too
There is no pregnant men, or pregnant women, only birthing persons

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 2:55 am
by verb_to_trust
spike wrote:hope this backfires on the GOP at midterms
You're free to continue wearing your mask if you like

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 2:56 am
by ---
B wrote:
--- wrote:
B wrote:Pack. The. Mother. Fucking. Court.
what's your favorite way to terminate a pregnancy?
Without Alito's input.
same energy