Page 157 of 792

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed August 20, 2014 10:32 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
Chris_H_2 wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
numbers wrote:I'm not really that opposed to the MVP needing to be on a good team thing.
MVP should pretty much go to the guy with the best WAR in the league.
You can stop blowing Keith Law any second now.
Are handjobs ok? :lol:

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed August 20, 2014 10:40 pm
by Norah
Chris_H_2 wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
numbers wrote:I'm not really that opposed to the MVP needing to be on a good team thing.
MVP should pretty much go to the guy with the best WAR in the league.
You can stop blowing Keith Law any second now.
Why, because I think the guy who has the greatest ability to help a team win is the most valuable player?

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed August 20, 2014 10:45 pm
by numbers
But if his team didn't win, what good was it?

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed August 20, 2014 10:46 pm
by Norah
How does that change the value of the player? If I lost a sack of money I got nothing to show for it, but it doesn't change how valuable that sack of money was.

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed August 20, 2014 10:48 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
Eck won the AL MVP in 1992 with a 2.9 WAR. Puckett who came in second with a WAR of 7.1. Just fucking ridiculous.

I also find Puckett incredibly underrated.

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed August 20, 2014 10:48 pm
by numbers
If that sack of money was worth more in one country than another, where would you rather spend it?

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed August 20, 2014 10:49 pm
by Norah
touche

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed August 20, 2014 10:51 pm
by Lament
BigRedLedbetter wrote:Eck won the AL MVP in 1992 with a 2.9 WAR. Puckett who came in second with a WAR of 7.1. Just fucking ridiculous.
And Clemens led the league with an 8.8, playing for the 7th place 73-89 Boston Red Sox.

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed August 20, 2014 10:52 pm
by numbers
Lament wrote:
BigRedLedbetter wrote:Eck won the AL MVP in 1992 with a 2.9 WAR. Puckett who came in second with a WAR of 7.1. Just fucking ridiculous.
And Clemens led the league with an 8.8, playing for the 7th place 73-89 Boston Red Sox.
And boy, did they suck. That record doesn't even do it justice, that was the first season I watched baseball.

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed August 20, 2014 10:53 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
Barry Larkin won the NL MVP in 1995. Love Barry Larkin. But his WAR was 5.9. Greg? Maddux had a WAR of 9.6 and finished 3rd. Dante Bichette finished second with a WAR of 1.1. :haha:

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed August 20, 2014 10:54 pm
by numbers
Dante Bichette had one of the best homerun swings in history.

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed August 20, 2014 10:54 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
Lament wrote:
BigRedLedbetter wrote:Eck won the AL MVP in 1992 with a 2.9 WAR. Puckett who came in second with a WAR of 7.1. Just fucking ridiculous.
And Clemens led the league with an 8.8, playing for the 7th place 73-89 Boston Red Sox.
With Puckett being kind of close in WAR that year and his team contending (I wanna say they finished second) he probably should have won. Weird to me Kirby never won an MVP.

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed August 20, 2014 10:55 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
numbers wrote:Dante Bichette had one of the best homerun swings in history.
Truth.

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed August 20, 2014 11:04 pm
by Lament
BigRedLedbetter wrote:Barry Larkin won the NL MVP in 1995. Love Barry Larkin. But his WAR was 5.9. Greg? Maddux had a WAR of 9.6 and finished 3rd. Dante Bichette finished second with a WAR of 1.1. :haha:
Barry Bonds had a 7.5 (second overall behind Maddux and first among all everyday players) and finished twelfth.

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed August 20, 2014 11:21 pm
by elliseamos
WAR, what is it good for?!!

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed August 20, 2014 11:49 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
Lament wrote:
BigRedLedbetter wrote:Barry Larkin won the NL MVP in 1995. Love Barry Larkin. But his WAR was 5.9. Greg? Maddux had a WAR of 9.6 and finished 3rd. Dante Bichette finished second with a WAR of 1.1. :haha:
Barry Bonds had a 7.5 (second overall behind Maddux and first among all everyday players) and finished twelfth.
Crazy. Just weird to me Larkin won.

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu August 21, 2014 12:19 am
by Lament
If you were to give the Cy Young Award to the pitcher with the highest WAR and the MVP to the position player with the highest WAR, Bonds would have won eleven MVPs. And seven of them would have been while he still weighed like 185 pounds.

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu August 21, 2014 2:06 am
by Bammer
Coach wrote:
Bammer wrote:I am pulling for the Cards on the chance they will have a home playoff game on 10/2 and I will see about scalping a ticket since I have never been to Busch stadium.

By the way anyone have a guess on what the "get in the door" price for that would be? My team hasn't been to the playoffs for a really long time.
My guess is less than $500.
Seriously for the worst seat in the house? Damn.

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu August 21, 2014 2:24 am
by Norah
Those Nats sure are something.

Re: MLB

Posted: Thu August 21, 2014 3:02 am
by philpritchard
cutuphalfdead wrote:How does that change the value of the player? If I lost a sack of money I got nothing to show for it, but it doesn't change how valuable that sack of money was.
The MVP analogy would be something like: you have $100 consisting of two$20 bills and six $10 bills. I have $80 consisting of a $50 bill, five $5 bills and a handful of change. Which bill is the most valuable?