Election 2016
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36770
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Election 2016
on anti-Trump violence
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_ ... scist.html
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_ ... scist.html
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46240
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: Election 2016
Fascists calling fascists fascist.
These morons are a gift to Trump.
These morons are a gift to Trump.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46240
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: Election 2016
where may I purchase this wonderful work of art?tommymtcom wrote:
RM's resident disinformation expert.
-
b_i_revisited
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Mon October 26, 2015 2:04 pm
Re: Election 2016
Good stuff.theplatypus wrote:on anti-Trump violence
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_ ... scist.html
If only this sentence was mandatory reading for all the hashtag activists out there... because there are plenty of other groups that could swapped in for "Trump supporters".To cite intentions and not actions as justification for violence against Trump supporters is to embrace the logic of even worse beliefs and actors.
http://www.livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=1278Alex wrote:i wonder what the supermassive jackhole broken iris would have thought about this
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Election 2016
this is wonderful. Jon Stewart on Trump. Taking him apart.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- darth_vedder
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 6467
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm
Re: Election 2016
I've got a bad feeling about this.
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29891
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: Election 2016
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/5/26 ... Plummet-59
maybe there will be another bankruptcy up his alley
maybe there will be another bankruptcy up his alley
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
- matt reeder
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1509
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:34 pm
Re: Election 2016
They're working overtime to try and prevent an embarrassing series of losses tomorrow in North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, New Mexico and perhaps California.dimejinky99 wrote:AP saying Clintons got the numbers.
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46240
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: Election 2016
Im happy to have a campaign sign up for a local election just 3 houses down from the polling place. #electioneering
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Election 2016
On polling day here it's illegal to have any posters or campaign related staff within 100 yards of the polling station
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21690
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: Election 2016
That would be a blatant violation of the First Amendment here.dimejinky99 wrote:On polling day here it's illegal to have any posters or campaign related staff within 100 yards of the polling station
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: Election 2016
So now I'm reading about Sherrod Brown as a VP candidate for Clinton. Why do people keep trying to suggest Democratic senators that would get replaced by Republican governors?
- Brett
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Mon January 07, 2013 5:30 pm
Re: Election 2016
Well...:http://www.nass.org/component/docman/?t ... d&gid=1347Green Habit wrote:That would be a blatant violation of the First Amendment here.dimejinky99 wrote:On polling day here it's illegal to have any posters or campaign related staff within 100 yards of the polling station
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35420
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Election 2016
"I disavow those comments," Ryan said.
Pressed on whether he regretted his own endorsement of Trump that came last week, Ryan added, "I regret those comments he made."
"It's absolutely unacceptable," Ryan said. But he stood by by his support for the controversial business mogul. "Do I think Hillary Clinton is the answer? No I do not."
http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/07/politics/ ... index.html
- CopperTom
- Champion of RM
- Posts: 10823
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
- Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Re: Election 2016
Not really. Rules like this exist in the states.Green Habit wrote:That would be a blatant violation of the First Amendment here.dimejinky99 wrote:On polling day here it's illegal to have any posters or campaign related staff within 100 yards of the polling station
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36770
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Election 2016
Paul Ryan looks a lot like Argo
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: Election 2016
I don't know if all those would survive a challenge in the courts. Certainly it could be regulated directly on the property of the polling place, and impeding ingress into the the polling place is obviously not allowed. But if the "within x feet/yards" encloses public places that aren't needed to be used by the polling stations, I think that's a real troublesome infringement of freedom of expression.Brett wrote:Well...:http://www.nass.org/component/docman/?t ... d&gid=1347Green Habit wrote:That would be a blatant violation of the First Amendment here.dimejinky99 wrote:On polling day here it's illegal to have any posters or campaign related staff within 100 yards of the polling station

