Page 159 of 199
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 3:56 am
by spike
verb_to_trust wrote:spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:Verb is pro life? That’s gold
I don't give a fuck about kids
cuz that's all it's about
I'm sterile so I don't care about the issue as it has no impact on me. I'm selfish.
fucking finally
I just can't be as good of a person as you. It's impossible.
you're so lazy
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 4:04 am
by verb_to_trust
spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:Verb is pro life? That’s gold
I don't give a fuck about kids
cuz that's all it's about
I'm sterile so I don't care about the issue as it has no impact on me. I'm selfish.
fucking finally
I just can't be as good of a person as you. It's impossible.
you're so lazy
Bro I've run 20 miles, at once. I'm not lazy
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 4:09 am
by macphisto
Do you have a 20.0 bumper sticker?
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 4:11 am
by spike
verb_to_trust wrote:spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:Verb is pro life? That’s gold
I don't give a fuck about kids
cuz that's all it's about
I'm sterile so I don't care about the issue as it has no impact on me. I'm selfish.
fucking finally
I just can't be as good of a person as you. It's impossible.
you're so lazy
Bro I've run 20 miles, at once. I'm not lazy
That only burned your calories.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 4:17 am
by verb_to_trust
macphisto wrote:Do you have a 20.0 bumper sticker?
No
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 4:17 am
by verb_to_trust
spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:Verb is pro life? That’s gold
I don't give a fuck about kids
cuz that's all it's about
I'm sterile so I don't care about the issue as it has no impact on me. I'm selfish.
fucking finally
I just can't be as good of a person as you. It's impossible.
you're so lazy
Bro I've run 20 miles, at once. I'm not lazy
That only burned your calories.
At least I don't have to wear a manzier
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 4:25 am
by Mickey
The Colombian group M-19 had some good ideas.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 4:33 am
by simple schoolboy
BurtReynolds wrote:Things are about to get mostly peaceful.
I hope the FEMEN deployment is limited to DC.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 4:34 am
by spike
verb_to_trust wrote:spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:Verb is pro life? That’s gold
I don't give a fuck about kids
cuz that's all it's about
I'm sterile so I don't care about the issue as it has no impact on me. I'm selfish.
fucking finally
I just can't be as good of a person as you. It's impossible.
you're so lazy
Bro I've run 20 miles, at once. I'm not lazy
That only burned your calories.
At least I don't have to wear a manzier
You gotta stop obsessing over JB too.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 4:34 am
by verb_to_trust
spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:Verb is pro life? That’s gold
I don't give a fuck about kids
cuz that's all it's about
I'm sterile so I don't care about the issue as it has no impact on me. I'm selfish.
fucking finally
I just can't be as good of a person as you. It's impossible.
you're so lazy
Bro I've run 20 miles, at once. I'm not lazy
That only burned your calories.
At least I don't have to wear a manzier
You gotta stop obsessing over JB too.
Who?
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 4:36 am
by simple schoolboy
Mickey wrote:The Colombian group M-19 had some good ideas.
I thought Shining Path was more your style.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 4:53 am
by spike
verb_to_trust wrote:spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:spike wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:Verb is pro life? That’s gold
I don't give a fuck about kids
cuz that's all it's about
I'm sterile so I don't care about the issue as it has no impact on me. I'm selfish.
fucking finally
I just can't be as good of a person as you. It's impossible.
you're so lazy
Bro I've run 20 miles, at once. I'm not lazy
That only burned your calories.
At least I don't have to wear a manzier
You gotta stop obsessing over JB too.
Who?
Demar Derozan
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 12:47 pm
by 4/5
Theories on the leak? Liberal clerk(s) hoping to spark a wave of outrage/protests/congressional action? Or public pressure for the majority to scale back the scope of this decision from a complete overrule to merely increased restrictions?
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 12:54 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 12:56 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 1:41 pm
by spike
tragabigzanda wrote:4/5 wrote:Theories on the leak? Liberal clerk(s) hoping to spark a wave of outrage/protests/congressional action? Or public pressure for the majority to scale back the scope of this decision from a complete overrule to merely increased restrictions?
GOP ploy to gauge impacts to the midterms
Sounds like wishful thinking.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 1:43 pm
by B
Breyer burning the place down on his way out.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 2:31 pm
by Green Habit
Upholding the law would not be dissenting, it would be concurring in the judgment.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 2:33 pm
by Green Habit
4/5 wrote:Theories on the leak? Liberal clerk(s) hoping to spark a wave of outrage/protests/congressional action? Or public pressure for the majority to scale back the scope of this decision from a complete overrule to merely increased restrictions?
Judging by the reaction I'm reading over the last half day, I seem to be far less interested about this than most other people are.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 2:50 pm
by McParadigm
tragabigzanda wrote:4/5 wrote:Theories on the leak? Liberal clerk(s) hoping to spark a wave of outrage/protests/congressional action? Or public pressure for the majority to scale back the scope of this decision from a complete overrule to merely increased restrictions?
GOP ploy to gauge impacts to the midterms
Given two options….
1. A week of click-hungry press headlines building up the anticipation of a major incoming abortion decision, putting increased public attention on it right before an explosive announcement.
…or…
2. A sudden late Monday leak when nobody is expecting it, which noises up the conversation with the type of pearl clutching decorum debate that pundits, politicians, and others can pivot to
instead of talking about the actual erosion of rights and the real world ramifications of that erosion for actual people.
…I’d take the latter if I was a conservative coming for Roe. Bonuses are that people will default to suspecting the other team, conservative media has a grievance angle, and states can start writing anticipatory bans that go into effect asap. It puts that much more time between the announcement and the next vote. A leak is kind of the best case scenario for Republicans.
The idea that this court will be pressured into changing its mind by public response seems naive to me.