Page 17 of 199

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Sat March 05, 2016 3:00 pm
by stip
yeah that liscensure argument is pretty weak tea, SS. I'm happy to entertain the possibility that that particular test may not be worthwhile, or that there should be subsidies available for license tests for people below a certain income threshold. But the idea of liscensure is meant to ensure that people who interact with the public in a particular profession are qualified. I know that the process itself can be abused, but the principle itself is perfectly reasonable.

Abortion is a private, self-regarding matter, and one of life and death where the consequences are far greater than whether or not you can get a job in a particular industry without jumping through an annoying hoop.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Sat March 05, 2016 5:56 pm
by B
I was gonna be a bus driver, but they wanted me to go to the DMV and pay some bullshit $30 fee to get, I don't know, a driver's license or some shit? Fuck them. Put me in the bus. I'm a smart guy. I'll figure out the buttons!

Seriously though, I'd like an example of a profession that requires license where the only person's well being you're risking is your own.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue March 08, 2016 12:35 am
by B
I need to get me one of these shirts.

Image

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue March 08, 2016 12:38 am
by Simple Torture
B, are you sitting down?
Spoiler: show
That is the ugliest t-shirt I have ever seen.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue March 08, 2016 12:43 am
by Green Habit
Simple Torture wrote:B, are you sitting down?
Spoiler: show
That is the ugliest t-shirt I have ever seen.
It does look like it's straight out of a Cards Against Humanity deck.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue March 08, 2016 12:44 am
by Norah
Green Habit wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:B, are you sitting down?
Spoiler: show
That is the ugliest t-shirt I have ever seen.
It does look like it's straight out of a Cards Against Humanity deck.
That was my first thought.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue March 08, 2016 1:08 am
by B
I was going to sell tsis.com shirts with Eddie&Stone&Mike&Jeff&Jimmy (or whatever drummer).

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue March 08, 2016 1:49 am
by Citizen Dick
Simple Torture wrote:B, are you sitting down?
Spoiler: show
That is the ugliest t-shirt I have ever seen.
Objection, your Honor.

Image

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Tue March 08, 2016 2:00 am
by Simple Torture
Citizen Dick wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:B, are you sitting down?
Spoiler: show
That is the ugliest t-shirt I have ever seen.
Objection, your Honor.

Image
Sustained.
Spoiler: show
But watch yourself, McCoy.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Wed March 16, 2016 5:58 am
by Simple Torture
I could've sworn I posted this earlier, but apparently didn't hit submit: the scuttlebutt is that Obama is going to announce a nominee on Wednesday.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Wed March 16, 2016 8:28 am
by knee tunes
I kicked the supreme court's ass.

Or at least I had a part in seriously altering it.

REmind me to tell you about it if you want.

Right now, its melted cheese on ritz and good cheese and spring 3P00 am 4

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Wed March 16, 2016 1:26 pm
by 4/5
Did he just confess to smothering Scalia to death with a pillow?

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Wed March 16, 2016 1:40 pm
by Simple Torture
Melted cheese on Ritz is one of my favorite snacks; I've been eating it since I was 5.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Wed March 16, 2016 2:13 pm
by @SkitchP
Simple Torture wrote:I could've sworn I posted this earlier, but apparently didn't hit submit: the scuttlebutt is that Obama is going to announce a nominee on Wednesday.

Merrick Garland.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Wed March 16, 2016 2:29 pm
by Green Habit
@SkitchP wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:I could've sworn I posted this earlier, but apparently didn't hit submit: the scuttlebutt is that Obama is going to announce a nominee on Wednesday.
Merrick Garland.
A 63-year old, eh? Seems like someone he could be happy with but not his first choice if things were more favorable in the Senate.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Wed March 16, 2016 2:37 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
@SkitchP wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:I could've sworn I posted this earlier, but apparently didn't hit submit: the scuttlebutt is that Obama is going to announce a nominee on Wednesday.

Merrick Garland.
Skitch admit that you just hurried in here to post this before GH did, and you got satisfaction out of doing so. Just admit it.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Wed March 16, 2016 2:40 pm
by Green Habit
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:I could've sworn I posted this earlier, but apparently didn't hit submit: the scuttlebutt is that Obama is going to announce a nominee on Wednesday.
Merrick Garland.
Skitch admit that you just hurried in here to post this before GH did, and you got satisfaction out of doing so. Just admit it.
I had no hope: I had to sleep in a bit this morning to catch up on sleep.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Wed March 16, 2016 2:48 pm
by stip
If Rs are panicking about Trump I wonder if they might be more inclined to strike a deal right now.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Wed March 16, 2016 2:53 pm
by Green Habit
Obama's speech on this should be at this link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLLpws7WjmI

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Wed March 16, 2016 2:58 pm
by Simple Torture
stip wrote:If Rs are panicking about Trump I wonder if they might be more inclined to strike a deal right now.
That seems to be the consensus among talking heads on TV. If Garland gets confirmed, he'd probably be on the court for 15-20 years. If Clinton wins the presidency and nominates someone younger, they could be on the bench for 35-40 years.