Page 17 of 36
Re: The Green Bay Packers
Posted: Fri September 05, 2014 2:52 am
by spike
and the wheels have officially come off. enjoy your super bowl comparisons for the rest of the evening, collinsworth.
Re: The Green Bay Packers
Posted: Fri September 05, 2014 2:53 am
by Lament
This sucks.
Re: The Green Bay Packers
Posted: Fri September 05, 2014 2:59 am
by Lament
Make it stop.
Re: The Green Bay Packers
Posted: Fri September 05, 2014 3:05 am
by verb_to_trust
LOB
Re: The Green Bay Packers
Posted: Fri September 05, 2014 3:07 am
by Kaius
That Kam Chancellor/Eddie Lacy collision was pretty good
Re: The Green Bay Packers
Posted: Fri September 05, 2014 3:12 am
by spike
solid drive, a bit of hope
Re: The Green Bay Packers
Posted: Fri September 05, 2014 3:24 am
by Lament
Fuck this.
Re: The Green Bay Packers
Posted: Fri September 05, 2014 3:25 am
by Kaius
15-1?
Re: The Green Bay Packers
Posted: Fri September 05, 2014 3:26 am
by Lament
Obviously.
Re: The Green Bay Packers
Posted: Fri September 05, 2014 3:26 am
by Kaius
Well..13-3. I see at least 2 more losses on your schedule.
Re: The Green Bay Packers
Posted: Fri September 05, 2014 3:31 am
by Bammer
/thread
Re: The Green Bay Packers
Posted: Fri September 05, 2014 3:48 am
by verb_to_trust
Are the Packers supposed to be good? I have no idea really...
Re: The Green Bay Packers
Posted: Fri September 05, 2014 3:51 am
by Orpheus
I think it's more Seattle is really good than GB is bad. GB has the same problems they always have but will beat 75% of the teams in the league on any given day.
Re: The Green Bay Packers
Posted: Fri September 05, 2014 3:54 am
by spike
Orpheus wrote:I think it's more Seattle is really good than GB is bad. GB has the same problems they always have but will beat 75% of the teams in the league on any given day.
yep, green bay is right where they've been the last couple years, good enough to make the playoffs and that's about it.
Re: The Green Bay Packers
Posted: Fri September 05, 2014 3:56 am
by Orpheus
Not being players in FA costs them but it also allows them to be competitive. Kind of a double-edged sword. I worry that their WR depth has finally fallen below average. I don't think Boykin/Adams had a single catch tonight. Some of that was being matched up on Sherman, but still kinda concerning.
Re: The Green Bay Packers
Posted: Fri September 05, 2014 3:56 am
by spike
this is hard to admit, but i'm finally starting to see that rodgers is not a transcendent quarterback. if he and the packers are clicking early, all is well. but if they fall behind or struggle, he can't be counted on to rally them back into the game.
Re: The Green Bay Packers
Posted: Fri September 05, 2014 3:58 am
by Lament
spike wrote:this is hard to admit, but i'm finally starting to see that rodgers is not a transcendent quarterback. if he and the packers are clicking early, all is well. but if they fall behind or struggle, he can't be counted on to rally them back into the game.
This is one of the things people forgot made Favre so great when 75% of the fanbase turned on him.
Re: The Green Bay Packers
Posted: Fri September 05, 2014 4:00 am
by Chris_H_2
Relax fans. It's the first game on the road in probably the toughest place to play in against the defending Super Bowl champions who has the league's best defense.
Re: The Green Bay Packers
Posted: Fri September 05, 2014 4:03 am
by Lament
I don't think any of are doubting that they'll still win the division. It's just that we've got championship hopes for them, and tonight they looked like they weren't ready to be a team that can get past the NFC title game.
Re: The Green Bay Packers
Posted: Fri September 05, 2014 4:05 am
by spike
Lament wrote:I don't think any of are doubting that they'll still win the division. It's just that we've got championship hopes for them, and tonight they looked like they weren't ready to be a team that can get past the NFC title game.
this