Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
-
CopperTom
- Champion of RM
- Posts: 10759
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
- Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
I skipped this one and Dark World. I thought the first Thor was the worst MCU movie. Are either of the sequels worth seeing?
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
-
Peeps
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm
Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
dark world was average at best. it lended itself to the further inifinty war story but the story itself was slightly underwhelming
the third was very good both in terms of the story, the writing and the acting. its hard to believe hal jordans buddy is behind reviving the Thor character but here we are
the third was very good both in terms of the story, the writing and the acting. its hard to believe hal jordans buddy is behind reviving the Thor character but here we are
Did the Mother Fucker pay extra to yell?
-
Bi_3
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16452
- Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm
Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
Ragnarok is top 5 Marvel, if not top 2.CopperTom wrote:I skipped this one and Dark World. I thought the first Thor was the worst MCU movie. Are either of the sequels worth seeing?
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."