Page 17 of 47
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 7:18 am
by Jorge
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 2:07 pm
by epilogue
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 2:09 pm
by ABNorman
Shit, you found me
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 2:09 pm
by epilogue
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 3:30 pm
by bada
I weep for humanity.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 6:08 pm
by VinylGuy
reviews are positive? Didnt see that one coming.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 6:11 pm
by epilogue
I did.
This is gonna be great.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 6:17 pm
by @SkitchP
VinylGuy wrote:reviews are positive? Didnt see that one coming.
Me either. Although it's really interesting to see metacrowd reviews. I think it's entirely possible that the "if you dont like it, you hate women" backlash may be making some reviewers give it lukewarm positive reviews to avoid the hassle.
*FWIW, I understand why the backlash exists because there are a LOT of assholes who have gone on and on about how it shouldn't have been remade with women.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 6:20 pm
by VinylGuy
yeah i thought about that.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 6:21 pm
by epilogue
@SkitchP wrote:VinylGuy wrote:reviews are positive? Didnt see that one coming.
Me either. Although it's really interesting to see metacrowd reviews. I think it's entirely possible that the "if you dont like it, you hate women" backlash may be making some reviewers give it lukewarm positive reviews to avoid the hassle.
*FWIW, I understand why the backlash exists because there are a LOT of assholes who have gone on and on about how it shouldn't have been remade with women.
Or it could, you know, be a decent little movie.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 6:23 pm
by @SkitchP
durdencommatyler wrote:@SkitchP wrote:VinylGuy wrote:reviews are positive? Didnt see that one coming.
Me either. Although it's really interesting to see metacrowd reviews. I think it's entirely possible that the "if you dont like it, you hate women" backlash may be making some reviewers give it lukewarm positive reviews to avoid the hassle.
*FWIW, I understand why the backlash exists because there are a LOT of assholes who have gone on and on about how it shouldn't have been remade with women.
Or it could, you know, be a decent little movie.
It's entirely possible as well. But the trailers give me no hope for that.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 6:25 pm
by epilogue
@SkitchP wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:@SkitchP wrote:VinylGuy wrote:reviews are positive? Didnt see that one coming.
Me either. Although it's really interesting to see metacrowd reviews. I think it's entirely possible that the "if you dont like it, you hate women" backlash may be making some reviewers give it lukewarm positive reviews to avoid the hassle.
*FWIW, I understand why the backlash exists because there are a LOT of assholes who have gone on and on about how it shouldn't have been remade with women.
Or it could, you know, be a decent little movie.
It's entirely possible as well. But the trailers give me no hope for that.
I've got enough hope for both of us.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 6:28 pm
by Jorge
It's silly to put a whole lot of stock in reviews, but the one thing everyone seems to agree on is that Kate McKinnon is great.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 6:29 pm
by epilogue
theplatypus wrote:It's silly to put a whole lot of stock in reviews, but the one thing everyone seems to agree on is that Kate McKinnon is great.
This shouldn't surprise anyone.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 6:36 pm
by @SkitchP
theplatypus wrote:It's silly to put a whole lot of stock in reviews, but the one thing everyone seems to agree on is that Kate McKinnon is great.
She seemed the most interesting by a long shot from the trailers.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 6:37 pm
by Jorge
Her and Chris Hemsworth. Wiig and McCarthy seem fine. Leslie Jones is aggressively unfunny in everything I've seen from this flick.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 6:39 pm
by epilogue
I've laughed at a few of Jones' bits in the trailers. But I also don't seem to have seen as many trailers as you guys or watched the two I've seen as frequently. This movie had my money when they announced it. Trailers don't mean shit.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 6:51 pm
by dimejinky99
This is getting great reviews over here.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 7:29 pm
by LoathedVermin72
Don't Feig movies usually get good reviews?
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 7:32 pm
by VinylGuy
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Don't Feig movies usually get good reviews?
True.
Also, i hated McKinnon in the trailers...its all so "meta¨ ut hurts. There seems to be no character at all, just a bunch of ¨cool¨ deliveries.