Page 161 of 252

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Thu June 30, 2016 1:51 pm
by philpritchard
MattA75 wrote:Stamkos for under 9 mil a year is an absolute steal
Yeah, I'm really surprised that's all he got. I thought someone would offer $10 million +.
MattA75 wrote:Edmonton couldn't have gotten better than Larsson for Taylor Hall?
So, so bad.
MattA75 wrote:Montreal might win that Subban trade in the short term, but that Weber contract is going to be an albatross in 3-4 years
I think, at best, it's even now and terrible for Montreal in the future.

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Thu June 30, 2016 2:03 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
I read somewhere yesterday that an unnamed team offered Stamkos almost 11 million, but for whatever reason he didn't take it. Maybe liked his chances for a cup better in Tampa than in whatever city that was?

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Thu June 30, 2016 2:09 pm
by chuck taylor
Whoa, I step away from the computer for a few days and all this crazy stuff happens.

Was a Subban trade expected? I don't really follow the Habs closely.

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Thu June 30, 2016 2:12 pm
by chuck taylor
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I read somewhere yesterday that an unnamed team offered Stamkos almost 11 million, but for whatever reason he didn't take it. Maybe liked his chances for a cup better in Tampa than in whatever city that was?
Probably the Sabres, and he just didn't want to live in Buffalo. :cry:

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Thu June 30, 2016 2:20 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
chuck taylor wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I read somewhere yesterday that an unnamed team offered Stamkos almost 11 million, but for whatever reason he didn't take it. Maybe liked his chances for a cup better in Tampa than in whatever city that was?
Probably the Sabres, and he just didn't want to live in Buffalo. :cry:
Can you blame him?

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Thu June 30, 2016 2:20 pm
by philpritchard
chuck taylor wrote:Whoa, I step away from the computer for a few days and all this crazy stuff happens.

Was a Subban trade expected? I don't really follow the Habs closely.
There's been talk of a Subban trade since before the draft (mostly to Edmonton or Vancouver), but Bergevin announced that he wasn't being traded, which is funny because there's no way this was an "offer we just couldn't refuse" type of trade. He was obviously trying to trade him all along.

This trade has Michel Therrien written all over it, which I love as a Leafs fan.

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Thu June 30, 2016 2:43 pm
by chuck taylor
And Taylor Hall got traded too. WTF.

Speaking of the Oilers, does anybody else have a hunch that McDavid is going to be a great "what-if" due to injuries? Or is that just me?
I felt that way as soon as I saw the toe-pick leading to the collarbone injury.

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Thu June 30, 2016 2:44 pm
by chuck taylor
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
chuck taylor wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I read somewhere yesterday that an unnamed team offered Stamkos almost 11 million, but for whatever reason he didn't take it. Maybe liked his chances for a cup better in Tampa than in whatever city that was?
Probably the Sabres, and he just didn't want to live in Buffalo. :cry:
Can you blame him?
Not at all. ;)

Seriously though, I'm sure he enjoys living in Tampa - nice weather, and he doesn't have to worry about getting hassled in public all the time, like he would in Toronto or somewhere else.

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Thu June 30, 2016 3:43 pm
by philpritchard
chuck taylor wrote:And Taylor Hall got traded too. WTF.

Speaking of the Oilers, does anybody else have a hunch that McDavid is going to be a great "what-if" due to injuries? Or is that just me?
I felt that way as soon as I saw the toe-pick leading to the collarbone injury.
I think my favourite part of the Hall trade is that the Oilers felt they had a good enough group of young, talented forwards that they could afford to trade one of their best for a defenseman... after finishing 25th, 26th and 26th in scoring the last three years.

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Thu June 30, 2016 4:39 pm
by MattA75
philpritchard wrote:
chuck taylor wrote:Whoa, I step away from the computer for a few days and all this crazy stuff happens.

Was a Subban trade expected? I don't really follow the Habs closely.
There's been talk of a Subban trade since before the draft (mostly to Edmonton or Vancouver), but Bergevin announced that he wasn't being traded, which is funny because there's no way this was an "offer we just couldn't refuse" type of trade. He was obviously trying to trade him all along.

This trade has Michel Therrien written all over it, which I love as a Leafs fan.
Montreal is such a dumpster fire of an organization...amazing they didn't learn anything from the Patrick Roy stuff 20 years ago

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Thu June 30, 2016 5:14 pm
by Mecca
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
chuck taylor wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I read somewhere yesterday that an unnamed team offered Stamkos almost 11 million, but for whatever reason he didn't take it. Maybe liked his chances for a cup better in Tampa than in whatever city that was?
Probably the Sabres, and he just didn't want to live in Buffalo. :cry:
Can you blame him?
I'm going to hip check you over the boards

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Thu June 30, 2016 5:18 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Mecca and Stamkos meetup: OFF

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Thu June 30, 2016 5:20 pm
by Mecca
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Mecca and Stamkos meetup: OFF
I didn't want him for over 9 million

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Thu June 30, 2016 7:07 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Mecca wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Mecca and Stamkos meetup: OFF
I didn't want him for over 9 million
Yeah but you wouldn't have complained had they signed him for over 9 mil.

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Thu June 30, 2016 7:28 pm
by Mecca
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Mecca wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Mecca and Stamkos meetup: OFF
I didn't want him for over 9 million
Yeah but you wouldn't have complained had they signed him for over 9 mil.
Yes I would've.

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Fri July 01, 2016 7:46 pm
by MattA75
6 years of Loui Eriksson...ugh...7 for Lucic wouldn't have been easier to swallow but at least he might've been able to mentor Virtanen

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Mon July 04, 2016 9:18 pm
by Dev
can't really understand why the kings gave up lucic. he was a great player to watch. kinda bummed.

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Tue July 05, 2016 1:02 am
by MattA75
Dev wrote:can't really understand why the kings gave up lucic. he was a great player to watch. kinda bummed.
well, when you have only less than 2 million in cap room for a guy who ended up getting 6 million a year...

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Tue July 05, 2016 2:00 pm
by philpritchard
MattA75 wrote:
Dev wrote:can't really understand why the kings gave up lucic. he was a great player to watch. kinda bummed.
well, when you have only less than 2 million in cap room for a guy who ended up getting 6 million a year...
Yep. He's actually a great fit in Edmonton right now, but that contract is gonna look ugly in a couple years.

Re: NHL Thread

Posted: Thu September 22, 2016 6:22 pm
by Dev
how is everyone feeling about their team going into a new season?