Re: Mind Your Manners
Posted: Mon July 29, 2013 9:30 pm
I was actually thinking that the video really highlighted how weak of a riff it is.Heathen wrote:it sounds better here than on the actual song
I was actually thinking that the video really highlighted how weak of a riff it is.Heathen wrote:it sounds better here than on the actual song
I'm only talking about the soundtheplatypus wrote:I was actually thinking that the video really highlighted how weak of a riff it is.Heathen wrote:it sounds better here than on the actual song
that has been them from the beginning.harmless wrote:I just find it slightly disturbing that every time they talk about writing a song they refer to other bands they wanted it to sound like. It's like they feel nothing about writing as Pearl Jam anymore. They have nothing to say.
Has it? It would make me feel a lot better if I felt that.stip wrote:that has been them from the beginning.harmless wrote:I just find it slightly disturbing that every time they talk about writing a song they refer to other bands they wanted it to sound like. It's like they feel nothing about writing as Pearl Jam anymore. They have nothing to say.
This. I like that part. Maybe I should revise my vote now.stip wrote:i wish they did more with that opening part.
pearl jam has never been 'original' and other than vedder never really had a sound all their own. they are a distillation of a wide array of musical influences rather than their own voice (again, outside Eddie). That's one of the reasons why you get so many styles of songs from them, and people will find themselves enjoying songs that are related to genres and approaches they are otherwise not really interested in .harmless wrote:Has it? It would make me feel a lot better if I felt that.stip wrote:that has been them from the beginning.harmless wrote:I just find it slightly disturbing that every time they talk about writing a song they refer to other bands they wanted it to sound like. It's like they feel nothing about writing as Pearl Jam anymore. They have nothing to say.
This is a good and comforting argument. I guess the first time I started to feel they were derivative now was Yield.stip wrote:pearl jam has never been 'original' and other than vedder never really had a sound all their own. they are a distillation of a wide array of musical influences rather than their own voice (again, outside Eddie). That's one of the reasons why you get so many styles of songs from them, and people will find themselves enjoying songs that are related to genres and approaches they are otherwise not really interested in .harmless wrote:Has it? It would make me feel a lot better if I felt that.stip wrote:that has been them from the beginning.harmless wrote:I just find it slightly disturbing that every time they talk about writing a song they refer to other bands they wanted it to sound like. It's like they feel nothing about writing as Pearl Jam anymore. They have nothing to say.
When they talk about their creative process it reminds me of a composer taking a brief from a client.harmless wrote:Yeah, me too. But I guess if someone isn't trying anything new I'd prefer to not hear them talk about it. I think I just dislike the way they talk about their process.
I like when they talk about the process. I just like it better when the end product isn't so transparent to where we have already figured it out.harmless wrote:Yeah, me too. But I guess if someone isn't trying anything new I'd prefer to not hear them talk about it. I think I just dislike the way they talk about their process.
Yeah, exactly this. We've responded to the brief, I think we've met it as best we could have. Overall success. It's weird.LetMeSleep wrote:When they talk about their creative process it reminds me of a composer taking a brief from a client.harmless wrote:Yeah, me too. But I guess if someone isn't trying anything new I'd prefer to not hear them talk about it. I think I just dislike the way they talk about their process.
its not black and white. They seem to lean much heavier on their influences these days to the point their own unique sound barely registers.harmless wrote:This is a good and comforting argument. I guess the first time I started to feel they were derivative now was Yield.stip wrote:pearl jam has never been 'original' and other than vedder never really had a sound all their own. they are a distillation of a wide array of musical influences rather than their own voice (again, outside Eddie). That's one of the reasons why you get so many styles of songs from them, and people will find themselves enjoying songs that are related to genres and approaches they are otherwise not really interested in .harmless wrote:Has it? It would make me feel a lot better if I felt that.stip wrote:that has been them from the beginning.harmless wrote:I just find it slightly disturbing that every time they talk about writing a song they refer to other bands they wanted it to sound like. It's like they feel nothing about writing as Pearl Jam anymore. They have nothing to say.
Also this.Thejambi wrote:I like when they talk about the process. I just like it better when the end product isn't so transparent to where we have already figured it out.harmless wrote:Yeah, me too. But I guess if someone isn't trying anything new I'd prefer to not hear them talk about it. I think I just dislike the way they talk about their process.
heh. yeah.Thejambi wrote:I like when they talk about the process. I just like it better when the end product isn't so transparent to where we have already figured it out.harmless wrote:Yeah, me too. But I guess if someone isn't trying anything new I'd prefer to not hear them talk about it. I think I just dislike the way they talk about their process.