Re: Lightning Bolt: The Official Album Thread
Posted: Fri October 11, 2013 5:15 pm
Instant classic is called instant classic for a reason, jerk.

One of the best moments of the album on a song i can't say i really care for.ABNorman wrote: Future Days (I love the almost discordant atmospheric stuff behind "I believe").
jdopj wrote:I cannot totally discard FD because of the I believe parts.
Congratulations!harmless wrote:I wasn't needing to like this album more than I did, but then I listened to the FLAC, and saw the artwork. Yep, 2013 will be remembered fondly. It's mine and my wife's first anniversary on the 27th as well
36 song + Lightning Bolt tracks which are most likely the ones that leakedsward wrote:Its probably been talked about already? But its very cool that 36 songs have been licensed to MLB for the games. This is my favorite time of year to watch baseball and even better now!
Nah Brah.gardenparty wrote:36 song + Lightning Bolt tracks which are most likely the ones that leakedsward wrote:Its probably been talked about already? But its very cool that 36 songs have been licensed to MLB for the games. This is my favorite time of year to watch baseball and even better now!
Let's go SOX!
haha. tiger fan? sorry to hear thatThejambi wrote:Nah Brah.gardenparty wrote:36 song + Lightning Bolt tracks which are most likely the ones that leakedsward wrote:Its probably been talked about already? But its very cool that 36 songs have been licensed to MLB for the games. This is my favorite time of year to watch baseball and even better now!
Let's go SOX!
I'm not.gardenparty wrote:haha. tiger fan? sorry to hear thatThejambi wrote:Nah Brah.gardenparty wrote:36 song + Lightning Bolt tracks which are most likely the ones that leakedsward wrote:Its probably been talked about already? But its very cool that 36 songs have been licensed to MLB for the games. This is my favorite time of year to watch baseball and even better now!
Let's go SOX!
Stone is very positive about Ed....very....almost too positive. He's always talking about how great and wonderful he is. I always wonder if he really believes what he is saying.Mine wrote:I get your point but no. He only felt the need to point that out after someone reminded him that despite the fact he didn't have time to play with it turned out ok. Besides your posts about Dave A's drumming on Vitalogy kind of kills his argumentharmless wrote:Maybe he wishes he could've done more work on it *because* it's his favourite. I know I feel like that about my poetry. When I publish a poem that I think is really good, I'm frustrated that I didn't wait to make it great.Tass Man wrote:did he really flip-flop though? if i recall, all he said was he wished they spent more time perfecting the songs during the No Code sessions... and then later said he loved In My Tree and Present Tense because they're some of his favourite lyrics... i don't see why he can't hold both opinions.Mine wrote:The way he flip flopped on Vitalogy/No Code after Richards called No Code fucking awesome.harmless wrote: What thing?![]()
This isn't new btw. Most people assume they jammed out Vitalogy because of his past quotes yet he states the opposite here and has said s/t was the 1st jammed out one after Vs. So i don't think he's new at this kind of shit. It's interesting how much positively Stone talks about Ed. It's like he's compensating for maybe giving him more shit then he deserved back in the day.
Just one thing: the "red dress" I've been hearing in LTRP is just "records". Which is far less interesting. But I need to warn you in case you use my writing about the song on the Internet, and embarrass us both.stip wrote:I just pmd that to myself so I could find it later. Harmlessness long post earlier as well
If he's compensating for giving him too much shit earlier on, it doesn't mean he's insincere in what he's saying.piratebob wrote:Stone is very positive about Ed....very....almost too positive. He's always talking about how great and wonderful he is. I always wonder if he really believes what he is saying.Mine wrote:I get your point but no. He only felt the need to point that out after someone reminded him that despite the fact he didn't have time to play with it turned out ok. Besides your posts about Dave A's drumming on Vitalogy kind of kills his argumentharmless wrote:Maybe he wishes he could've done more work on it *because* it's his favourite. I know I feel like that about my poetry. When I publish a poem that I think is really good, I'm frustrated that I didn't wait to make it great.Tass Man wrote:did he really flip-flop though? if i recall, all he said was he wished they spent more time perfecting the songs during the No Code sessions... and then later said he loved In My Tree and Present Tense because they're some of his favourite lyrics... i don't see why he can't hold both opinions.Mine wrote:The way he flip flopped on Vitalogy/No Code after Richards called No Code fucking awesome.harmless wrote: What thing?![]()
This isn't new btw. Most people assume they jammed out Vitalogy because of his past quotes yet he states the opposite here and has said s/t was the 1st jammed out one after Vs. So i don't think he's new at this kind of shit. It's interesting how much positively Stone talks about Ed. It's like he's compensating for maybe giving him more shit then he deserved back in the day.