I’ve also noticed this. He’s the anti-trump republican who gets too into the identity. JD Vance is going the opposite way.BurtReynolds wrote:It's funny watching Bill Kristol suddenly turn against overturning Roe after decades of limp-dicked writing saying it should be overturned. What a shocking surprise!
The Supreme Court
-
Rob
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2888
- Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:46 am
- Location: Connecticut
Re: The Supreme Court
-
BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46221
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: The Supreme Court
He's an actor paid to represent the Republican party (poorly) to liberals, and that was always his only job.
He's the reason why the term RINO was invented.
He's the reason why the term RINO was invented.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
-
BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46221
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: The Supreme Court
Kristol in every TV appearance with democrats: "yeah I basically agree with you, but maybe we should slow down a bit. No need to rush things. Also we should give more money to Israel and invade more countries."
RM's resident disinformation expert.
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: The Supreme Court
Many such cases.BurtReynolds wrote:Kristol in every TV appearance with democrats: "yeah I basically agree with you, but maybe we should slow down a bit. No need to rush things. Also we should give more money to Israel and invade more countries."
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: The Supreme Court
Not SCOTUS, but 5th circuit:
I hope the courts continue to dismantle the administrative state. Hopefully they do the ATF next.
I hope the courts continue to dismantle the administrative state. Hopefully they do the ATF next.
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: The Supreme Court
Gorsuch is on record wanting to overturn Chevron. Apparently his mother was the head of the EPA at the time of the ruling in question. What would Freud say about this?
-
B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 25034
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: The Supreme Court
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: The Supreme Court
Why would Ginni Thomas go to Politico?
-
B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 25034
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: The Supreme Court
Because if it came through the New York Post you don't get this:simple schoolboy wrote:Why would Ginni Thomas go to Politico?
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
-
4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6989
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
Pour some out for the 4th Amendment.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
-
Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
Gorsuch continuing to be the woke justice on Indigenous matters:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/2 ... 3_jgko.pdf
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/2 ... 3_jgko.pdf
-
B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 25034
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: The Supreme Court
will it be enough in the Brackeen case?Green Habit wrote:Gorsuch continuing to be the woke justice on Indigenous matters:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/2 ... 3_jgko.pdf
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
-
Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/2 ... 8_dbfi.pdfHeld: Maine’s “nonsectarian” requirement for otherwise generally available tuition assistance payments violates the Free Exercise Clause.
-
Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
Sticking with my general interpretation of the Religion Clause as "government shall neither favor nor disfavor religion", I'm inclined to think that the Court got this one right.
-
4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6989
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
Yeah, not a surprising result. And I'm assuming the dissent said that this is an establishment not a free-exercise issue?
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: The Supreme Court
Green Habit wrote:Sticking with my general interpretation of the Religion Clause as "government shall neither favor nor disfavor religion", I'm inclined to think that the Court got this one right.
-
Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
Breyer has a good challenge to my core view here, I'll have to consider this further.4/5 wrote:Yeah, not a surprising result. And I'm assuming the dissent said that this is an establishment not a free-exercise issue?
-
Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
I think the trollier one is someone starting their own religion and building their own school for it.simple schoolboy wrote:Green Habit wrote:Sticking with my general interpretation of the Religion Clause as "government shall neither favor nor disfavor religion", I'm inclined to think that the Court got this one right.
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: The Supreme Court
The impetus for the original law was anti-catholic bias, so I don't know how this analysis holds up. Promoting religion over non-religion seems just dandy.Green Habit wrote:Breyer has a good challenge to my core view here, I'll have to consider this further.4/5 wrote:Yeah, not a surprising result. And I'm assuming the dissent said that this is an establishment not a free-exercise issue?
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: The Supreme Court
Several folks were talking about church of Satan schools. Good luck funding a school with like 5 students.Green Habit wrote:I think the trollier one is someone starting their own religion and building their own school for it.simple schoolboy wrote:Green Habit wrote:Sticking with my general interpretation of the Religion Clause as "government shall neither favor nor disfavor religion", I'm inclined to think that the Court got this one right.