Re: The National
Posted: Thu June 01, 2017 4:43 pm
LoathedVermin72 wrote:That new song is so weak.

LoathedVermin72 wrote:That new song is so weak.

thank godChris_H_2 wrote:but he cut his hair
This is totally accurate. His voice also has very little power. His singing style doesn't typically allow for much volume (and most of their songs don't call for it), but when he has to belt it out he often really struggles (which typically means that he just screams some off key/pitch rubbish). Even so, The National are my favorite current band.Simple Torture wrote:As a big fan of The National, I feel comfortable saying this: I feel like Matt's voice only translates live like 50% of the time. Listening to them play the new single live right now and I think he sounds awful.
bodysnatcher wrote:thank godChris_H_2 wrote:but he cut his hair
I feel like this band is expert at turning weaknesses into strengths. The uptempo songs to me work because in that moment they're able to make it not about the big vocal moment, but it just sounds like the aural equivalent of a nervous breakdown. They realize Matt can't do the Big Singing Moment, so they move the goalposts, in a way.PHATJ wrote:This is totally accurate. His voice also has very little power. His singing style doesn't typically allow for much volume (and most of their songs don't call for it), but when he has to belt it out he often really struggles (which typically means that he just screams some off key/pitch rubbish). Even so, The National are my favorite current band.Simple Torture wrote:As a big fan of The National, I feel comfortable saying this: I feel like Matt's voice only translates live like 50% of the time. Listening to them play the new single live right now and I think he sounds awful.
All true--and when you're actually seeing them live, you don't notice it as much. But the feed from Paris was very "clean"--very little audience noise, so you heard every note he hit and every note he missed.digster wrote:I feel like this band is expert at turning weaknesses into strengths. The uptempo songs to me work because in that moment they're able to make it not about the big vocal moment, but it just sounds like the aural equivalent of a nervous breakdown. They realize Matt can't do the Big Singing Moment, so they move the goalposts, in a way.PHATJ wrote:This is totally accurate. His voice also has very little power. His singing style doesn't typically allow for much volume (and most of their songs don't call for it), but when he has to belt it out he often really struggles (which typically means that he just screams some off key/pitch rubbish). Even so, The National are my favorite current band.Simple Torture wrote:As a big fan of The National, I feel comfortable saying this: I feel like Matt's voice only translates live like 50% of the time. Listening to them play the new single live right now and I think he sounds awful.
Oh yeah I got it, and I agree 100%PHATJ wrote:Don't get me wrong, I love his voice on albums, and his screams, and almost everything this band has ever released. Matt's recorded voice sounds so cool and it fits the band so well. And as digster said, their playing fits with him even better. But there are times when Matt just isn't a great live singer. That said, when he's good in the live setting he can be brilliant.
When I saw El Vy a couple of years ago, I thought Matt sounded pretty great, but I'm sure if I went back and listened to the recordings I'd feel differently. He does have a way of masking his weaknesses to a certain degree.chewm wrote:Oh yeah I got it, and I agree 100%PHATJ wrote:Don't get me wrong, I love his voice on albums, and his screams, and almost everything this band has ever released. Matt's recorded voice sounds so cool and it fits the band so well. And as digster said, their playing fits with him even better. But there are times when Matt just isn't a great live singer. That said, when he's good in the live setting he can be brilliant.