Page 18 of 18

Re: 2016-05-01: New York, New York

Posted: Mon May 02, 2016 8:48 pm
by EJ
so, Ed did the "I was trippin' balls" line instead of "I was upside down" again during In Hiding. Why is he still doing this?

Re: 2016-05-01: New York, New York

Posted: Mon May 02, 2016 8:53 pm
by tragabigzanda
pearl jam sucks now

Re: 2016-05-01: New York, New York

Posted: Mon May 02, 2016 8:55 pm
by i got bugs
I didn't think takin it to the streets sounded that bad, but it woulda been way cooler if they covered long train runnin

Re: 2016-05-01: New York, New York

Posted: Mon May 02, 2016 8:57 pm
by swan
I'd prefer a China Grove

Re: 2016-05-01: New York, New York

Posted: Mon May 02, 2016 9:01 pm
by i got bugs
Did the doobie brothers get their name because they smoked a lot of pot, or did some stoner call a joint a doobie bec he liked to get high and listen to the doobie brothers??

Which came first??

Re: 2016-05-01: New York, New York

Posted: Mon May 02, 2016 9:02 pm
by Bi_3
tragabigzanda wrote:
EJ wrote:so, Ed did the "I was trippin' balls" line instead of "I was upside down" again during In Hiding. Why is he still doing this?
Because he's a rich 51 year-old man-child and hippie who can still use and celebrate psychedelic drugs at will without fear of professional blowback. I'd probably be making the same choices were I in his shoes.
Speak your truth, brother.

Re: 2016-05-01: New York, New York

Posted: Mon May 02, 2016 9:22 pm
by Norah
tragabigzanda wrote:
EJ wrote:so, Ed did the "I was trippin' balls" line instead of "I was upside down" again during In Hiding. Why is he still doing this?
Because he's a rich 51 year-old man-child and hippie who can still use and celebrate psychedelic drugs at will without fear of professional blowback. I'd probably be making the same choices were I in his shoes.
He can use and celebrate all the drugs he wants without making stupid lyrical changes.

Re: 2016-05-01: New York, New York

Posted: Mon May 02, 2016 9:26 pm
by EJ
cutuphalfdead wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
EJ wrote:so, Ed did the "I was trippin' balls" line instead of "I was upside down" again during In Hiding. Why is he still doing this?
Because he's a rich 51 year-old man-child and hippie who can still use and celebrate psychedelic drugs at will without fear of professional blowback. I'd probably be making the same choices were I in his shoes.
He can use and celebrate all the drugs he wants without making stupid lyrical changes.
Exactly.

Re: 2016-05-01: New York, New York

Posted: Mon May 02, 2016 10:36 pm
by wease
i got bugs wrote:I didn't think takin it to the streets sounded that bad, but it woulda been way cooler if they covered long train runnin
THIS. The only disappointment is no background vocals. They'd have a hard time pulling those off, and they didn't even seem to try last night. Finally, a cover Boom sounds really good on.

Get ready guys: I much preferred TITTS over Comfortably Numb and would've loved to hear it over the 2 times I got the Pink Floyd track on this tour.

Re: 2016-05-01: New York, New York

Posted: Tue May 03, 2016 12:12 am
by wease
You know, the lyrics to taking it to the streets are pure Ed lyrics.

Re: 2016-05-01: New York, New York

Posted: Tue May 03, 2016 12:20 am
by Simple Torture
wease wrote:
i got bugs wrote:I didn't think takin it to the streets sounded that bad, but it woulda been way cooler if they covered long train runnin
THIS. The only disappointment is no background vocals. They'd have a hard time pulling those off, and they didn't even seem to try last night. Finally, a cover Boom sounds really good on.

Get ready guys: I much preferred TITTS over Comfortably Numb and would've loved to hear it over the 2 times I got the Pink Floyd track on this tour.
I, too, love tits.

Re: 2016-05-01: New York, New York

Posted: Tue May 03, 2016 12:41 am
by i got bugs
wease wrote:
i got bugs wrote:I didn't think takin it to the streets sounded that bad, but it woulda been way cooler if they covered long train runnin
THIS. The only disappointment is no background vocals. They'd have a hard time pulling those off, and they didn't even seem to try last night. Finally, a cover Boom sounds really good on.
I guess the point of the cover was a bday present for his buddy who likes m mcdonald.. it's tough bec it's hard for a white guy to pull off that voice

Re: 2016-05-01: New York, New York

Posted: Tue May 03, 2016 12:52 am
by spike
WHO WAS PLAYING MIKE'S GUITAR ON RITFW

Re: 2016-05-01: New York, New York

Posted: Tue May 03, 2016 12:55 am
by aintitthelife98
Matt Cameron's son I believe.

Re: 2016-05-01: New York, New York

Posted: Tue May 03, 2016 1:07 am
by Chris_H_2
How do you know? Was he walking around and waving really effeminately?

Re: 2016-05-01: New York, New York

Posted: Tue May 03, 2016 1:25 am
by wease
Simple Torture wrote:
wease wrote:
i got bugs wrote:I didn't think takin it to the streets sounded that bad, but it woulda been way cooler if they covered long train runnin
THIS. The only disappointment is no background vocals. They'd have a hard time pulling those off, and they didn't even seem to try last night. Finally, a cover Boom sounds really good on.

Get ready guys: I much preferred TITTS over Comfortably Numb and would've loved to hear it over the 2 times I got the Pink Floyd track on this tour.
I, too, love tits.
Ha! Didn't even notice that!

I suddenly feel like hearing a certain Joe Walsh tune...

Re: 2016-05-01: New York, New York

Posted: Mon June 19, 2017 4:44 pm
by mikejasond
The first post is missing RITFW and Indifference