LoathedVermin72 wrote:Don't Feig movies usually get good reviews?
True.
Also, i hated McKinnon in the trailers...its all so "meta¨ ut hurts. There seems to be no character at all, just a bunch of ¨cool¨ deliveries.
The thing is, they don't even seem like "cool" deliveries. Every preview I've seen has had nothing but predictable one-liners that are so overused they aren't funny any more.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 7:35 pm
by VinylGuy
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Don't Feig movies usually get good reviews?
True.
Also, i hated McKinnon in the trailers...its all so "meta¨ ut hurts. There seems to be no character at all, just a bunch of ¨cool¨ deliveries.
The thing is, they don't even seem like "cool" deliveries. Every preview I've seen has had nothing but predictable one-liners that are so overused they aren't funny any more.
True. I hated her liking the gun.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 7:36 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
VinylGuy wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Don't Feig movies usually get good reviews?
True.
Also, i hated McKinnon in the trailers...its all so "meta¨ ut hurts. There seems to be no character at all, just a bunch of ¨cool¨ deliveries.
The thing is, they don't even seem like "cool" deliveries. Every preview I've seen has had nothing but predictable one-liners that are so overused they aren't funny any more.
True. I hated her liking the gun.
and the whole "I left a good job for this?" line.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 7:41 pm
by tommymtcom
You guys are so sexist.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 7:45 pm
by VinylGuy
tommymtcom wrote:You guys are so sexist.
And racist.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 7:49 pm
by Mecca
And in love with each other
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 7:51 pm
by tommymtcom
I love Ruddo.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Mon July 11, 2016 7:53 pm
by Jorge
I may be a racist, a sexist, a communist, but I am NOT a porn star!
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Tue July 12, 2016 12:35 pm
by stip
durdencommatyler wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:reviews are positive? Didnt see that one coming.
Me either. Although it's really interesting to see metacrowd reviews. I think it's entirely possible that the "if you dont like it, you hate women" backlash may be making some reviewers give it lukewarm positive reviews to avoid the hassle.
*FWIW, I understand why the backlash exists because there are a LOT of assholes who have gone on and on about how it shouldn't have been remade with women.
Or it could, you know, be a decent little movie.
It's entirely possible as well. But the trailers give me no hope for that.
I've got enough hope for both of us.
This will be the first movie I see in my new home
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Tue July 12, 2016 12:46 pm
by dimejinky99
22...impressive.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Tue July 12, 2016 1:59 pm
by epilogue
stip wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:reviews are positive? Didnt see that one coming.
Me either. Although it's really interesting to see metacrowd reviews. I think it's entirely possible that the "if you dont like it, you hate women" backlash may be making some reviewers give it lukewarm positive reviews to avoid the hassle.
*FWIW, I understand why the backlash exists because there are a LOT of assholes who have gone on and on about how it shouldn't have been remade with women.
Or it could, you know, be a decent little movie.
It's entirely possible as well. But the trailers give me no hope for that.
I've got enough hope for both of us.
This will be the first movie I see in my new home
This makes me super happy.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Tue July 12, 2016 10:16 pm
by B
These guys give solid reviews. I'll probably see it based on this.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Tue July 12, 2016 10:31 pm
by BurtReynolds
If you see this movie based on the "positive" reviews, you are all bigger idiots than I thought.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Tue July 12, 2016 10:35 pm
by Jorge
BurtReynolds wrote:If you see this movie based on the "positive" reviews, you are all bigger idiots than I thought.
I'm just having a great time watching all the virulently anti-reboot people lose their shit
Same with the crestfallen Bernie supporters when he endorsed HRC today. No-dog-in-this-fight schadenfreude is addictive.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Tue July 12, 2016 10:43 pm
by BurtReynolds
theplatypus wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:If you see this movie based on the "positive" reviews, you are all bigger idiots than I thought.
I'm just having a great time watching all the virulently anti-reboot people lose their shit
Same with the crestfallen Bernie supporters when he endorsed HRC today. No-dog-in-this-fight schadenfreude is addictive.
People have to fight over stupid shit. This matters!
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed July 13, 2016 12:19 am
by dimejinky99
Made the mistake of reading some comments about this. So depressing. People losin their minds and being vitriolic and they haven't even seen it.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed July 13, 2016 12:34 am
by Monkey_Driven
dimejinky99 wrote:Made the mistake of reading some comments about this. So depressing. People losin their minds and being vitriolic and they haven't even seen it.
So, you discovered the internet?
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed July 13, 2016 12:38 am
by LoathedVermin72
I still have no doubts this movie is absolutely terrible.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed July 13, 2016 12:41 am
by dimejinky99
Monkey_Driven wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:Made the mistake of reading some comments about this. So depressing. People losin their minds and being vitriolic and they haven't even seen it.
So, you discovered the internet?
Nah but this is a whole new level of just horrible. No need for th majority of it. Be wonderful if they took that energy and spent it on something that needs vocal support.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed July 13, 2016 1:30 am
by epilogue
dimejinky99 wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:Made the mistake of reading some comments about this. So depressing. People losin their minds and being vitriolic and they haven't even seen it.
So, you discovered the internet?
Nah but this is a whole new level of just horrible. No need for th majority of it. Be wonderful if they took that energy and spent it on something that needs vocal support.
