Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Mon June 06, 2016 2:11 am
Why the hell did they leave nearly 10 minutes on the table?
Budgetscutuphalfdead wrote:Why the hell did they leave nearly 10 minutes on the table?
durdencommatyler wrote:Ian McShane is a good actor. This was a waste of his talents.
its okay, Thoros of Myr will just resurrect himdurdencommatyler wrote:Ian McShane is a good actor. This was a waste of his talents.
I'm just saying, Chud could have played Ian's part. There was no reason to cast such a fantastic actor for 15 minutes of work. What a waste.@SkitchP wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:Ian McShane is a good actor. This was a waste of his talents.
I like McShane (about the only thing I loved in Deadwood) but I didn't want this to become 3 weeks of the redemption of the Hound. Im okay with it being short.
durdencommatyler wrote:I'm just saying, Chud could have played Ian's part. There was no reason to cast such a fantastic actor for 15 minutes of work. What a waste.@SkitchP wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:Ian McShane is a good actor. This was a waste of his talents.
I like McShane (about the only thing I loved in Deadwood) but I didn't want this to become 3 weeks of the redemption of the Hound. Im okay with it being short.
plus he was way too charismatic to exist more than 15 minutes in this world@SkitchP wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:I'm just saying, Chud could have played Ian's part. There was no reason to cast such a fantastic actor for 15 minutes of work. What a waste.@SkitchP wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:Ian McShane is a good actor. This was a waste of his talents.
I like McShane (about the only thing I loved in Deadwood) but I didn't want this to become 3 weeks of the redemption of the Hound. Im okay with it being short.
I think to get the point across as well as they did in 15 minutes required such and actor.
I think I could have played it and it would have been the exact same.@SkitchP wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:I'm just saying, Chud could have played Ian's part. There was no reason to cast such a fantastic actor for 15 minutes of work. What a waste.@SkitchP wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:Ian McShane is a good actor. This was a waste of his talents.
I like McShane (about the only thing I loved in Deadwood) but I didn't want this to become 3 weeks of the redemption of the Hound. Im okay with it being short.
I think to get the point across as well as they did in 15 minutes required such and actor.
Mecca wrote:plus he was way too charismatic to exist more than 15 minutes in this world@SkitchP wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:I'm just saying, Chud could have played Ian's part. There was no reason to cast such a fantastic actor for 15 minutes of work. What a waste.@SkitchP wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:Ian McShane is a good actor. This was a waste of his talents.
I like McShane (about the only thing I loved in Deadwood) but I didn't want this to become 3 weeks of the redemption of the Hound. Im okay with it being short.
I think to get the point across as well as they did in 15 minutes required such and actor.
what is dead may never die@SkitchP wrote:Mecca wrote:plus he was way too charismatic to exist more than 15 minutes in this world@SkitchP wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:I'm just saying, Chud could have played Ian's part. There was no reason to cast such a fantastic actor for 15 minutes of work. What a waste.@SkitchP wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:Ian McShane is a good actor. This was a waste of his talents.
I like McShane (about the only thing I loved in Deadwood) but I didn't want this to become 3 weeks of the redemption of the Hound. Im okay with it being short.
I think to get the point across as well as they did in 15 minutes required such and actor.
We all miss Lament.