Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

May the force be with you
Post Reply
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40176
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by wease »

B wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:Was Chewie subtitled in TFA or TLJ Jorge?

I know Mayhew and the new guy actually are given dialogue and say it on set it’s in the script but they just dub chewie noises over it. Never heard any outside of ‘that old mans crazy’ in a new hope
I'm almost certain I've never seen subtitles for Chewie, R2, or BB-8 prior to Solo.
I’m not almost certain, I’m 100% positive I’ve never seen them.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
bune
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9359
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
Location: Washington State

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by bune »

Guys. Come on.
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40176
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by wease »

Greedo and Jabba are the only two I can think of. Maybe Bib Fortuna.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by @SkitchP »

I saw this again and liked it marginally better than the first time.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by epilogue »

I watched it again the other day, too. Still a fun movie. It's the least interesting of the Disney films, to be sure.
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by dimejinky99 »

Dunno about that. It’s very tantalising what may come out of it. I don’t Think this wanted to be interesting. This needed to be no brainer easy digestible fun. It’s that and more.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40176
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by wease »

dimejinky99 wrote:Dunno about that. It’s very tantalising what may come out of it. I don’t Think this wanted to be interesting. This needed to be no brainer easy digestible fun. It’s that and more.
Which Disney SW movie is LESS interesting than Solo?
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by dimejinky99 »

wease wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:Dunno about that. It’s very tantalising what may come out of it. I don’t Think this wanted to be interesting. This needed to be no brainer easy digestible fun. It’s that and more.
Which Disney SW movie is LESS interesting than Solo?

We both know the answer. Let’s not though.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by @SkitchP »

dimejinky99 wrote:
wease wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:Dunno about that. It’s very tantalising what may come out of it. I don’t Think this wanted to be interesting. This needed to be no brainer easy digestible fun. It’s that and more.
Which Disney SW movie is LESS interesting than Solo?

We both know the answer. Let’s not though.

Translation: I can't think of one.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

TFA
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by dimejinky99 »

@SkitchP wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
wease wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:Dunno about that. It’s very tantalising what may come out of it. I don’t Think this wanted to be interesting. This needed to be no brainer easy digestible fun. It’s that and more.
Which Disney SW movie is LESS interesting than Solo?

We both know the answer. Let’s not though.

Translation: I can't think of one.

Rogue one. It’s not interesting at all. We know directly what the scenario is and has come from via Rebels/Catalyst and we know exactly what happens the next moment it finishes.
The ring of Caffrene was the only interesting thing in the film.

I’d watch a movie about even younger Han on the streets and how did that happen. What about Beckett and Vals story? Or Landos?

Or Enfys fuckin nest?? How did Dragon boobies end up being Vos’ lieutenant? What’s gonna happen with maul?? What are han and chewie gonna do next?

All far more intriguing and interesting. Rogue one has leads in and one lead out yet is somehow airtight and impervious to any questions like those raised in Solo.

(Saying that, I know a lot of this stuff will be answered an expanded across comics and books etc if it hasn’t started already)
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

Yes because the only thing that makes a movie is interesting is story details
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Of course he was talking about Rogue One. You know, the only good SW movie of the new bunch.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by dimejinky99 »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:Yes because the only thing that makes a movie is interesting is story details

Helps if the characters are well developed and interesting too and given time to have a story and empathise or even root for them and oh well.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by dimejinky99 »

LV rank the Disney Star Wars films in order of your choice

I’ll wait
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

1. Rogue One


































2. The Last Jedi
3. Solo














































4. The Force Awakens
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by dimejinky99 »

That was unexpected. Cool list. Are all the gaps for the raft of new films were about to get? Good idea.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40176
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by wease »

@SkitchP wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
wease wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:Dunno about that. It’s very tantalising what may come out of it. I don’t Think this wanted to be interesting. This needed to be no brainer easy digestible fun. It’s that and more.
Which Disney SW movie is LESS interesting than Solo?

We both know the answer. Let’s not though.

Translation: I can't think of one.
Me, neither.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40176
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by wease »

dimejinky99 wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
wease wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:Dunno about that. It’s very tantalising what may come out of it. I don’t Think this wanted to be interesting. This needed to be no brainer easy digestible fun. It’s that and more.
Which Disney SW movie is LESS interesting than Solo?

We both know the answer. Let’s not though.

Translation: I can't think of one.

Rogue one. It’s not interesting at all. We know directly what the scenario is and has come from via Rebels/Catalyst and we know exactly what happens the next moment it finishes.
The ring of Caffrene was the only interesting thing in the film.

I’d watch a movie about even younger Han on the streets and how did that happen. What about Beckett and Vals story? Or Landos?

Or Enfys fuckin nest?? How did Dragon boobies end up being Vos’ lieutenant? What’s gonna happen with maul?? What are han and chewie gonna do next?

All far more intriguing and interesting. Rogue one has leads in and one lead out yet is somehow airtight and impervious to any questions like those raised in Solo.

(Saying that, I know a lot of this stuff will be answered an expanded across comics and books etc if it hasn’t started already)
You’re saying Solo is interesting based on stuff that isn’t even in the movie. You’re listing things and directions that may never occur and saying that makes Solo interesting. It’s like saying IG-88 possibly meeting Captain Kirk makes ESB an interesting movie.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

Post by dimejinky99 »

wease wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
wease wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:Dunno about that. It’s very tantalising what may come out of it. I don’t Think this wanted to be interesting. This needed to be no brainer easy digestible fun. It’s that and more.
Which Disney SW movie is LESS interesting than Solo?

We both know the answer. Let’s not though.

Translation: I can't think of one.

Rogue one. It’s not interesting at all. We know directly what the scenario is and has come from via Rebels/Catalyst and we know exactly what happens the next moment it finishes.
The ring of Caffrene was the only interesting thing in the film.

I’d watch a movie about even younger Han on the streets and how did that happen. What about Beckett and Vals story? Or Landos?

Or Enfys fuckin nest?? How did Dragon boobies end up being Vos’ lieutenant? What’s gonna happen with maul?? What are han and chewie gonna do next?

All far more intriguing and interesting. Rogue one has leads in and one lead out yet is somehow airtight and impervious to any questions like those raised in Solo.

(Saying that, I know a lot of this stuff will be answered an expanded across comics and books etc if it hasn’t started already)
You’re saying Solo is interesting based on stuff that isn’t even in the movie. You’re listing things and directions that may never occur and saying that makes Solo interesting. It’s like saying IG-88 possibly meeting Captain Kirk makes ESB an interesting movie.

Mileage may vary on what constitutes interesting in this context. Solo is a gold mine of what ifs and questions and possibilities. That’s the life blood of most Star Wars fans. Speculation etc. It’s none of those things to other people maybe not as wrapped up in it. That’s fine I get that.
Ps I love rogue one I was just seeing if it’s still easy to set the lads off :)
It was as easy as ever:)
Calibrate your enthusiasm
Post Reply