The Supreme Court

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Green Habit »

tragabigzanda wrote:We’ve probably lost GH and 4/5 forever now that dev has taken control of this thread
We'll always have our Constitution thread to nerd out on, at least.

I could move these posts if I find the time, but I see that an abortion thread has already been created, so hopefully that does the trick.
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Green Habit »

Held: The Free Exercise and Free Speech Clauses of the First Amendment protect an individual engaging in a personal religious observance from government reprisal; the Constitution neither mandates nor permits the government to suppress such religious expression.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/2 ... 8_i425.pdf
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Green Habit »

A horseshoe alliance! This one is regarding interpreting how Congress corrected the crack cocaine sentencing disparity.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/2 ... 0_3dq3.pdf
simple schoolboy
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5934
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by simple schoolboy »

Green Habit wrote:
Held: The Free Exercise and Free Speech Clauses of the First Amendment protect an individual engaging in a personal religious observance from government reprisal; the Constitution neither mandates nor permits the government to suppress such religious expression.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/2 ... 8_i425.pdf
Yeah, we aren't France, there can be no imposition of public secularism.

How much of this was the school district misunderstanding the previous rulings regarding staff led prayer?
User avatar
Dev
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7507
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:46 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Dev »

Green Habit wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:We’ve probably lost GH and 4/5 forever now that dev has taken control of this thread
We'll always have our Constitution thread to nerd out on, at least.

I could move these posts if I find the time, but I see that an abortion thread has already been created, so hopefully that does the trick.
Wait, why do you need to move my posts? It seems like people engaged with them and I made valid points on the topic?
AMAB
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Green Habit »

Dev wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:We’ve probably lost GH and 4/5 forever now that dev has taken control of this thread
We'll always have our Constitution thread to nerd out on, at least.

I could move these posts if I find the time, but I see that an abortion thread has already been created, so hopefully that does the trick.
Wait, why do you need to move my posts? It seems like people engaged with them and I made valid points on the topic?
I think they (and those from others) were fine, it just seemed like people wanted to discuss the merits of abortion itself elsewhere. Maybe I misread the sentiment.
User avatar
Dev
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7507
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:46 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Dev »

Green Habit wrote:
Dev wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:We’ve probably lost GH and 4/5 forever now that dev has taken control of this thread
We'll always have our Constitution thread to nerd out on, at least.

I could move these posts if I find the time, but I see that an abortion thread has already been created, so hopefully that does the trick.
Wait, why do you need to move my posts? It seems like people engaged with them and I made valid points on the topic?
I think they (and those from others) were fine, it just seemed like people wanted to discuss the merits of abortion itself elsewhere. Maybe I misread the sentiment.
I think Trag was just being petty and suggesting that me posting in the thread would alienate you from posting there. Actually he explicitly says that in his post. Seems like he was actually derailing the thread with the conversation we are having now. Maybe you should move his posts? I would also consider giving him a permaban. I appreciate you taking our suggestions, Green Habbit.
AMAB
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51788
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Dev wrote: I would also consider giving him a permaban.
:lol:
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Green Habit »

Dev wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
Dev wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:We’ve probably lost GH and 4/5 forever now that dev has taken control of this thread
We'll always have our Constitution thread to nerd out on, at least.

I could move these posts if I find the time, but I see that an abortion thread has already been created, so hopefully that does the trick.
Wait, why do you need to move my posts? It seems like people engaged with them and I made valid points on the topic?
I think they (and those from others) were fine, it just seemed like people wanted to discuss the merits of abortion itself elsewhere. Maybe I misread the sentiment.
I think Trag was just being petty and suggesting that me posting in the thread would alienate you from posting there. Actually he explicitly says that in his post. Seems like he was actually derailing the thread with the conversation we are having now. Maybe you should move his posts? I would also consider giving him a permaban. I appreciate you taking our suggestions, Green Habbit.
Yep, just totally misread. I'm going to step back from this like Homer Simpson in the hedges, and recalibrate for more opinions that are coming on Wednesday.
User avatar
Dev
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7507
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:46 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Dev »

Green Habit wrote:
Dev wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
Dev wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:We’ve probably lost GH and 4/5 forever now that dev has taken control of this thread
We'll always have our Constitution thread to nerd out on, at least.

I could move these posts if I find the time, but I see that an abortion thread has already been created, so hopefully that does the trick.
Wait, why do you need to move my posts? It seems like people engaged with them and I made valid points on the topic?
I think they (and those from others) were fine, it just seemed like people wanted to discuss the merits of abortion itself elsewhere. Maybe I misread the sentiment.
I think Trag was just being petty and suggesting that me posting in the thread would alienate you from posting there. Actually he explicitly says that in his post. Seems like he was actually derailing the thread with the conversation we are having now. Maybe you should move his posts? I would also consider giving him a permaban. I appreciate you taking our suggestions, Green Habbit.
Yep, just totally misread. I'm going to step back from this like Homer Simpson in the hedges, and recalibrate for more opinions that are coming on Wednesday.
Alright, no worries, buddy. FYI the trag account is no good. Sorry he baited you into this horrible situation.
AMAB
simple schoolboy
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5934
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by simple schoolboy »

Requiring mens rea for "over-prescribing" opiates seems like a good thing. Why not use this opportunity to push for a mens rea requirement for basically everything?
simple schoolboy
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5934
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by simple schoolboy »

Mods: If there is a circuit court thread please move it.

Sowing (justifying extensive economic regulation under the interstate commerce clause)

Reaping: It's even more delicious when they can combat BDS on discriminatory grounds.
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Green Habit »

Tomorrow's going to be the last day, and it's going to have environmental and immigration issues on the docket.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

?
(patriotic choking noises)
doug rr
The Master
Posts: 27320
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by doug rr »

that was already planned right? brown taking over
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21560
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Simple Torture »

Yeah, Brown Jackson hasn't actually sat on the court yet. Breyer peacing out before the long weekend.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

Simple Torture wrote:Yeah, Brown Jackson hasn't actually sat on the court yet. Breyer peacing out before the long weekend.
I wouldn't want to be murdered by activists either.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Mickey »

They're not going to shoot HIM
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

Mickey wrote:They're not going to shoot HIM
:haha:

:shake:
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Green Habit »

Held: [...] Congress did not grant EPA in Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act the authority to devise emissions caps based on the generation shifting approach the Agency took in the Clean Power Plan.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/2 ... 0_n758.pdf
Post Reply