Ehh Meg is definitely worse but Solo is still baddimejinky99 wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Yes. It is absolute dogshit.
Never underestimate the stupidity of people. Solo is brilliant Star Wars fun. Their loss
Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33836
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
- bune
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9359
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
- Location: Washington State
Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
Ah. They're never going to be anywhere near me so I don't pay attention to the location of the shows.LoathedVermin72 wrote:No, they did that one in LA. I went to Look Who’s Talking Too.bune wrote:Is that the episode of HDTGM that you're going to?
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Ehh Meg is definitely worse but Solo is still baddimejinky99 wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Yes. It is absolute dogshit.
Never underestimate the stupidity of people. Solo is brilliant Star Wars fun. Their loss
Well I don’t see where money it made comes into it if your point wasn’t people are stupid.
Plus Meg is getting marketed to Fuck. Heavily.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33836
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
I just think it’s insane that a Jason Statham shark movie has outperformed a Star Wars movie. Again, Disney really fucked this all up.
- bune
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9359
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
- Location: Washington State
Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
Yeah, probably. They should have monitored Lord/Miller more closely so it didn't get to the point where the movie was 'done' before they had to redo it.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
I do t think that made any difference. The marketing for this was almost non existent. They released it against three other of their own releases within a few weeks. They were always sending this one over the top and if it lived or died they knew what they were doing.
They made a small profit on this I’d say given they didn’t spend anything like the normal amount of money marketing.
They knew they needed a pallet cleanser after the last Jedi. It served that purpose for those that did see it.
They made a small profit on this I’d say given they didn’t spend anything like the normal amount of money marketing.
They knew they needed a pallet cleanser after the last Jedi. It served that purpose for those that did see it.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42772
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
They killed the movie before it was released for sure.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 45831
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
but in this movie the shark is like really big.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
So, you're saying that their goal all along was just to make a small profit? I don't believe that for one second. It's Disneydimejinky99 wrote:I do t think that made any difference. The marketing for this was almost non existent. They released it against three other of their own releases within a few weeks. They were always sending this one over the top and if it lived or died they knew what they were doing.
They made a small profit on this I’d say given they didn’t spend anything like the normal amount of money marketing.
They knew they needed a pallet cleanser after the last Jedi. It served that purpose for those that did see it.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
E.H. Ruddock wrote:So, you're saying that their goal all along was just to make a small profit? I don't believe that for one second. It's Disneydimejinky99 wrote:I do t think that made any difference. The marketing for this was almost non existent. They released it against three other of their own releases within a few weeks. They were always sending this one over the top and if it lived or died they knew what they were doing.
They made a small profit on this I’d say given they didn’t spend anything like the normal amount of money marketing.
They knew they needed a pallet cleanser after the last Jedi. It served that purpose for those that did see it.
Why release it against four other big tent poles? And spend no money marketing it? And only 5 months after TLJ? Dipping their toes in to see how 2 movies a year would go. If there was a Fuck up it was not releasing at Christmas with a proper marketing drive. But they own the game now. They don’t fuck up.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36490
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
They fucked up
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
They also don't release movies to "not make money". They fucked updimejinky99 wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:So, you're saying that their goal all along was just to make a small profit? I don't believe that for one second. It's Disneydimejinky99 wrote:I do t think that made any difference. The marketing for this was almost non existent. They released it against three other of their own releases within a few weeks. They were always sending this one over the top and if it lived or died they knew what they were doing.
They made a small profit on this I’d say given they didn’t spend anything like the normal amount of money marketing.
They knew they needed a pallet cleanser after the last Jedi. It served that purpose for those that did see it.
Why release it against four other big tent poles? And spend no money marketing it? And only 5 months after TLJ? Dipping their toes in to see how 2 movies a year would go. If there was a Fuck up it was not releasing at Christmas with a proper marketing drive. But they own the game now. They don’t fuck up.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42772
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
They fucked up a lot with this one. They basically re shoot the whole movie and then didnt marketed. Of course they are the biggest corporation in the world so its ok for them, but boy they did everything wrong.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33836
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
I think the lukewarm reaction the public had to TLJ played a role here as well.
- blueviper
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4133
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:03 pm
Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
All of the above.
TLJ lukewarm for some viewers.
Below average marketing
SW-burnout? (3 SW movies within 16 months)
Up against big comic book movies (Comic book movies are the big item the past decade)
below average SW movie
TLJ lukewarm for some viewers.
Below average marketing
SW-burnout? (3 SW movies within 16 months)
Up against big comic book movies (Comic book movies are the big item the past decade)
below average SW movie
St. Louis (1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2010, 2022)
- blueviper
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4133
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:03 pm
Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
Also,
I didn't find this myself, but read about it from somewhere...
The Dart Maul hologram, the red of his face can be scene as well as the red lightsaber. Is this the first time a hologram has color other than the bluish tint they normally have?
Probably to make audiences know for sure they were seeing Darth Maul and a red lightsaber.
I didn't find this myself, but read about it from somewhere...
The Dart Maul hologram, the red of his face can be scene as well as the red lightsaber. Is this the first time a hologram has color other than the bluish tint they normally have?
Probably to make audiences know for sure they were seeing Darth Maul and a red lightsaber.
St. Louis (1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2010, 2022)
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42772
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
You think? It was a huge hit. I still dont know one person who didnt love it here.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I think the lukewarm reaction the public had to TLJ played a role here as well.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- blueviper
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4133
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:03 pm
Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
VinylGuy wrote:You think? It was a huge hit. I still dont know one person who didnt love it here.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I think the lukewarm reaction the public had to TLJ played a role here as well.
*shrug* I haven't talked to one person I know that has seen TLJ that has "loved" it. Most have been "meh" and a few were "like"
St. Louis (1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2010, 2022)
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
Umm, are you being sarcastic?VinylGuy wrote:You think? It was a huge hit. I still dont know one person who didnt love it here.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I think the lukewarm reaction the public had to TLJ played a role here as well.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42772
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
Nope.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Umm, are you being sarcastic?VinylGuy wrote:You think? It was a huge hit. I still dont know one person who didnt love it here.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I think the lukewarm reaction the public had to TLJ played a role here as well.
Im saying here in the real world not RM or the internet.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.