Red Mosquito

I hate it here.

I don’t like the way this game had been going.

I don’t know, guys. I think bama might eek out a win here.

this is bumming out my dog, no pun intended.

I knew we'd play better than last week and thought we'd have a moderate chance to win if we could keep their scoring low, but I can't say I expected this kind of game at all.

So if Michigan wins in a close one will Bama jump them? If Bama is still #2 I bet UGA will be #3...

Georgia gonna Georgia

Their TE is very good.

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:So if Michigan wins in a close one will Bama jump them? If Bama is still #2 I bet UGA will be #3...

My guess Bama 1, Michigan 2, Georgia 3 and Cincinnati 4. They could rematch Georgia and Alabama in the 1st game or. Last years Peach Bowl, and if Michigan loses, it’s probably ND or Baylor 4 but I think, Bama vs Cincinnati and Michigan vs Georgia is more likely for the 31st.

Electromatic wrote:

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:So if Michigan wins in a close one will Bama jump them? If Bama is still #2 I bet UGA will be #3...

My guess Bama 1, Michigan 2, Georgia 3 and Cincinnati 4. They could rematch Georgia and Alabama in the 1st game or. Last years Peach Bowl, and if Michigan loses, it’s probably ND or Baylor 4 but I think, Bama vs Cincinnati and Michigan vs Georgia is more likely for the 31st.

Yeah that top 4 is probably the most likely. I think ND would get in over Baylor though.

UGA will probably dominate the playoffs now...

Not a fan of Charles Woodson saying “we” about Michigan. Come on man. Unprofessional.

Bammer wrote:Not a fan of Charles Woodson saying “we” about Michigan. Come on man. Unprofessional.

What's worse, that or his ascots?

Bammer wrote:Not a fan of Charles Woodson saying “we” about Michigan. Come on man. Unprofessional.

Lenny says “we” when referring to Alabama.

Chris_H_2 wrote:

Bammer wrote:Not a fan of Charles Woodson saying “we” about Michigan. Come on man. Unprofessional.

Lenny says “we” when referring to Alabama.

I alternate, but i'm also not a paid Commentator.

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

Bammer wrote:Not a fan of Charles Woodson saying “we” about Michigan. Come on man. Unprofessional.

Lenny says “we” when referring to Alabama.

I alternate, but i'm also not a paid Commentator.

Did you attend the University of Alabama?

Also, i'm not sure why you guys would expect Woodson to be professional as he's

Spoiler: show

a homosexual.

spike wrote:

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

Bammer wrote:Not a fan of Charles Woodson saying “we” about Michigan. Come on man. Unprofessional.

Lenny says “we” when referring to Alabama.

I alternate, but i'm also not a paid Commentator.

Did you attend Alabama University?

Who cares.

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:

spike wrote:

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

Bammer wrote:Not a fan of Charles Woodson saying “we” about Michigan. Come on man. Unprofessional.

Lenny says “we” when referring to Alabama.

I alternate, but i'm also not a paid Commentator.

Did you attend Alabama University?

Who cares.

It’d be like me saying we when referring to the Badgers even though I didn’t go there, or Bammer saying we about the Huskies like he actually went to college.

spike wrote:

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:

spike wrote:

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

Bammer wrote:Not a fan of Charles Woodson saying “we” about Michigan. Come on man. Unprofessional.

Lenny says “we” when referring to Alabama.

I alternate, but i'm also not a paid Commentator.

Did you attend Alabama University?

Who cares.

It’d be like me saying we when referring to the Badgers, or Bammer saying we about the Huskies like he actually went to college.

I am aware of that, and it doesn't bother me.

Probably hard to justify Cincy higher than 4, which means Bama will be 1 so no immediate rematch with Georgia.

spike wrote:Probably hard to justify Cincy higher than 4, which means Bama will be 1 so no rematch the week after w Georgia.