Red Mosquito

B wrote:Buccee's is the new hotness.

B wrote:By the way, is making fun of Walz's kid the new Republican strategy? Fun.

dimejinky99 wrote:

B wrote:By the way, is making fun of Walz's kid the new Republican strategy? Fun.

knew they were all the worst kind of horrible cunts imaginable. Scumbags.

but attacking that kid is already backfiring on them.

it's gonna bury Trumps hopes of reelection.

dad wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:

B wrote:By the way, is making fun of Walz's kid the new Republican strategy? Fun.

knew they were all the worst kind of horrible cunts imaginable. Scumbags.

but attacking that kid is already backfiring on them.

it's gonna bury Trumps hopes of reelection.

let's not forget that he mocked a disabled reporter back in 2015/2016 and still got elected.

Simple Torture wrote:ruddo, does it drive you nuts that there are three threads that are essentially Election 2024 threads right now?

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

Simple Torture wrote:ruddo, does it drive you nuts that there are three threads that are essentially Election 2024 threads right now?

Absolutely. Was just fuming over it this morning.

dimejinky99 wrote:

dad wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:

B wrote:By the way, is making fun of Walz's kid the new Republican strategy? Fun.

knew they were all the worst kind of horrible cunts imaginable. Scumbags.

but attacking that kid is already backfiring on them.

it's gonna bury Trumps hopes of reelection.

let's not forget that he mocked a disabled reporter back in 2015/2016 and still got elected.

fair point. This is different though.

B wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:

dad wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:

B wrote:By the way, is making fun of Walz's kid the new Republican strategy? Fun.

knew they were all the worst kind of horrible cunts imaginable. Scumbags.

but attacking that kid is already backfiring on them.

it's gonna bury Trumps hopes of reelection.

let's not forget that he mocked a disabled reporter back in 2015/2016 and still got elected.

fair point. This is different though.

No. It's not. MAGAs won't care. We just have endure the worst behavior imaginable, and it will have zero impact on the outcome of the election.

tragabigzanda wrote:

ImpactAlpha wrote:"On her way to the Democratic National Convention in Chicago, Vice President Kamala Harris stopped in Moon Township, Pa., to talk, among other things, about her plan to expand the child tax credit for newborns and revive the expanded benefit available during the Covid-19 pandemic. How would she pay for the $6,000 credit, a reporter asked. Pandemic-era expanded child tax credits, since discontinued, helped cut child poverty rates by half. “The return on that investment, in terms of what that will do and what it will pay for, will be tremendous,” Harris said. She uses the same language of business to talk about other social priorities. Homeownership, for example, increases the tax base to provide vital funding for schools. Her focus on measurement and returns may have resonance for impact investors, many of whom are investing behind the same themes. “It's a mistake for any person who talks about public policy to not critically evaluate how you measure the return on investment when you are strengthening neighborhoods, strengthening communities, and investing in a broad-based economy,” she said. “Everybody benefits, and it pays for itself in that way.”

Ideologically it resonates, but to my knowledge she never answered the question on how she'll pay for it.

wease wrote:Kamala’s sis is pretty hot.

tragabigzanda wrote:Not that anyone cares, but she’s made some ground with me the last few days. Her campaign promises seem to run the gamut from practical/actionable to total pipe dream, but at least there are a lot of ideas…

My biggest hurdle has been her position on Palestine, and her words on the topic tonight weren’t the vigorous support of Palestinians I’d hope for, nor a total break from the war machine, but it also wasn’t insignificant as far as political platitudes go.