Re: Ryan Adams
Posted: Wed September 23, 2015 1:23 am
It is really good pop album. Between commercials, sporting events, the radio, and everything else I feel like I hear a song or two of hers every week.
The chemist? Is this Aussie-speak for "pharmacy?"Birds in Hell wrote:I heard Shake It Off when I was waiting in line at the chemist once but I think that's it.
I prefer "apothecary".Kevin Davis wrote:The chemist? Is this Aussie-speak for "pharmacy?"Birds in Hell wrote:I heard Shake It Off when I was waiting in line at the chemist once but I think that's it.
Ha, I think both terms are used pretty interchangeably over here.Kevin Davis wrote:The chemist? Is this Aussie-speak for "pharmacy?"Birds in Hell wrote:I heard Shake It Off when I was waiting in line at the chemist once but I think that's it.
For the most part I like it. It's an interesting take and really shows the strength of the songs themselves when you hear them in a different style.LetMeSleep wrote:I'm interested how KD dct and Chud feel about this. I think they all like the original album.
cutuphalfdead wrote:For the most part I like it. It's an interesting take and really shows the strength of the songs themselves when you hear them in a different style.LetMeSleep wrote:I'm interested how KD dct and Chud feel about this. I think they all like the original album.
I think Pearl Jam should cover this one:Strat wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:For the most part I like it. It's an interesting take and really shows the strength of the songs themselves when you hear them in a different style.LetMeSleep wrote:I'm interested how KD dct and Chud feel about this. I think they all like the original album.
lol. I think it brought out how bad the lyrics are and how standard issue the phrasing is.
Theres nothing wrong with that because its pop music and it does what it sets out to do. Simplistic, straight forward, dumb and catchy.
I listened to about 2/3 of it this morning and thought it was completely unremarkable. I don't feel as though he brings anything new or surprising or even vaguely interesting to these songs; I don't think he's in particularly good voice on the recording; and the interpretive liberties he takes consistently strip the songs of their melodic coherence. I don't think it succeeds as an interpretive statement, and I don't think it succeeds as a fun novelty project; to me it just sounds like a run-of-the-mill Ryan Adams album.LetMeSleep wrote:I'm interested how KD dct and Chud feel about this. I think they all like the original album.
That's a relief -- I was worried you'd gotten yourself into a "Breaking Bad"-type situation, I was about to get busy looking up ways to stage an intervention over the internet.Birds in Hell wrote:Ha, I think both terms are used pretty interchangeably over here.Kevin Davis wrote:The chemist? Is this Aussie-speak for "pharmacy?"Birds in Hell wrote:I heard Shake It Off when I was waiting in line at the chemist once but I think that's it.
Seriously.Monkey_Driven wrote:How is that even remotely possible?psychobain wrote:liked it a lot
never actually heard a TS song
I have also never heard a Taylor Swift song.BigRedLedbetter wrote:Seriously.Monkey_Driven wrote:How is that even remotely possible?psychobain wrote:liked it a lot
never actually heard a TS song
Do you live in a fallout bunker?oasisfan35 wrote:I have also never heard a Taylor Swift song.BigRedLedbetter wrote:Seriously.Monkey_Driven wrote:How is that even remotely possible?psychobain wrote:liked it a lot
never actually heard a TS song
I get that, but you still interact with a world that has music playing in the background and such. Her music has been everywhere.BurtReynolds wrote:Thankfully, we live in an age where it's easier than ever to avoid mainstream pop garbage. Hooray for fragmentation!
No, I do not.Monkey_Driven wrote:Do you live in a fallout bunker?oasisfan35 wrote:I have also never heard a Taylor Swift song.BigRedLedbetter wrote:Seriously.Monkey_Driven wrote:How is that even remotely possible?psychobain wrote:liked it a lot
never actually heard a TS song