Page 19 of 472

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Wed October 14, 2015 5:17 pm
by McParadigm
Every time a Labrador dies, an angel laughs maniacally.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Wed October 14, 2015 5:20 pm
by LoathedVermin72
I would kill a dog before I would kill a baby.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Wed October 14, 2015 5:22 pm
by The Argonaut
Wife, dinner party, thank you

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Wed October 14, 2015 5:23 pm
by McParadigm
The Argonaut wrote:Liberals always threaten to move to Canada if a hated candidate gets elected. Where would conservatives threaten to go if someone like Bernie became President?
To war.*


*Probably said slowly and dramatically.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Wed October 14, 2015 5:25 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
The Argonaut wrote:Liberals always threaten to move to Canada if a hated candidate gets elected. Where would conservatives threaten to go if someone like Bernie became President?
I always laughed at the Canada thing. You can't move to and become a resident of Canada just out of the blue. You have to have a job lined up. I tried it once, although not for political reasons.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Wed October 14, 2015 5:27 pm
by McParadigm
No. Wait. I forgot...they just question the legitimacy of his citizenship/birth and talk a bunch of crazy nonsense for a while. Then they try to elect a reality TV star.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Wed October 14, 2015 5:27 pm
by Strat
They threaten succession

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Wed October 14, 2015 11:55 pm
by CopperTom
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:Liberals always threaten to move to Canada if a hated candidate gets elected. Where would conservatives threaten to go if someone like Bernie became President?
I always laughed at the Canada thing. You can't move to and become a resident of Canada just out of the blue. You have to have a job lined up. I tried it once, although not for political reasons.
What were your reasons?

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Thu October 15, 2015 12:02 am
by E.H. Ruddock
CopperTom wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:Liberals always threaten to move to Canada if a hated candidate gets elected. Where would conservatives threaten to go if someone like Bernie became President?
I always laughed at the Canada thing. You can't move to and become a resident of Canada just out of the blue. You have to have a job lined up. I tried it once, although not for political reasons.
What were your reasons?
I liked it there. Calgary specifically

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Thu October 15, 2015 12:28 am
by BurtReynolds
The way Elizabeth Warren talks is so obnoxious. I could never support her regardless of how great she might be.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Thu October 15, 2015 12:30 am
by Norah
her press secretary is a smoke show

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Thu October 15, 2015 9:35 pm
by The Argonaut
I passionately agree with Trump and Carson on one issue: The next GOP debate should not be more thab 2 hours long. Apparently, they're threatening to sit the next debate out if CNBC makes it longer than 2 hours or if they don't set time aside for opening and closing statements.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Thu October 15, 2015 9:55 pm
by Green Habit
The Argonaut wrote:I passionately agree with Trump and Carson on one issue: The next GOP debate should not be more thab 2 hours long. Apparently, they're threatening to sit the next debate out if CNBC makes it longer than 2 hours or if they don't set time aside for opening and closing statements.
Which isn't going to happen until more candidates get culled from the stage.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Thu October 15, 2015 10:05 pm
by The Argonaut
Green Habit wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:I passionately agree with Trump and Carson on one issue: The next GOP debate should not be more thab 2 hours long. Apparently, they're threatening to sit the next debate out if CNBC makes it longer than 2 hours or if they don't set time aside for opening and closing statements.
Which isn't going to happen until more candidates get culled from the stage.
If that's what Trump and Carson are getting at, then I'm all for that, too.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Thu October 15, 2015 10:26 pm
by nyquillyn
That would probably be a violation of the equal-time rule.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Thu October 15, 2015 10:56 pm
by BurtReynolds
My feed is blowing up with Bernie love. Those poor deluded fools. This time next year they'll all be arguing over Bush vs. Clinton again. Because we are all idiots.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Fri October 16, 2015 12:45 am
by McParadigm
The Argonaut wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:I passionately agree with Trump and Carson on one issue: The next GOP debate should not be more thab 2 hours long. Apparently, they're threatening to sit the next debate out if CNBC makes it longer than 2 hours or if they don't set time aside for opening and closing statements.
Which isn't going to happen until more candidates get culled from the stage.
If that's what Trump and Carson are getting at, then I'm all for that, too.
Preferably starting with Trump.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Fri October 16, 2015 12:58 am
by 96583UP
Simple Torture wrote:P.S. Bern and his wife are fucking

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Fri October 16, 2015 1:18 pm
by hlniv
cutuphalfdead wrote:her press secretary is a smoke show
Image
https://www.linkedin.com/pub/lacey-j-rose/50/6ba/a55

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Fri October 16, 2015 4:11 pm
by Norah
hlniv wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:her press secretary is a smoke show
Image
https://www.linkedin.com/pub/lacey-j-rose/50/6ba/a55
I couldn't find a good picture of her online. But I've met her before and damn.