Red Mosquito

durdencommatyler wrote:You're a weird dude, Argo.

LoathedVermin72 wrote:THERE'S HOPE AFTER ALL

dimejinky99 wrote:Who owns DC?

It's probably a really good time to buy their shares.

Disneys shares were way down then they bought Lucasfilm and they shot up.

The Argonaut wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:You're a weird dude, Argo.

As we approach the end of a page, I sometimes feel freer to experiment a little and do something whacky and maybe annoying, knowing that it's only moments away from being bottom-paged and forgotten.

Why Whedon’s “Wonder Woman” Fell Apart

We’re three entries into the blossoming DC Comics Extended Universe initiative, and it’s the next entry that has some people the most excited – “Wonder Woman”.

Marking the character’s first solo film on the big screen, there’s excitement to see what direction filmmaker Patty Jenkins and her crew will take with the character.

Over a decade ago, Warners was working on a different attempt at a “Wonder Woman” film – one that “Buffy” creator and “The Avengers” director Joss Whedon was attached to. Speaking with Empire this week, Whedon reflected on why his project fell apart before it ever got off the ground:

“I worked really hard on that movie and it meant a lot [to me], but I don’t know if what I was trying to do would fit in with what [the studio’s] vision is. I had a take on the film that, well, nobody liked… We just saw different movies, and at the price range this kind of movie hangs in, that’s never gonna work.”

Whedon’s version at the time was to have been set in modern day and featured Diana Prince leaving her home of Themyscira with the character’s comic book love interest Steve Trevor to deal with real-world problems like drug dealers.

The story is a part of Empire’s feature story on the new film which includes a bunch of first look photos. Those pictures have been scanned in and can be seen below. “Wonder Woman” opens in theaters on June 2nd.

Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.

verb_to_trust wrote:Now that Affleck is out I'd like to see WB bring in a transgender Batman.

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:Now that Affleck is out I'd like to see WB bring in a transgender Batman.

I don't understand what you're trying to accomplish with this post

durdencommatyler wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:Now that Affleck is out I'd like to see WB bring in a transgender Batman.

I don't understand what you're trying to accomplish with this post

Really? Seems pretty clear to me.

verb_to_trust wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:Now that Affleck is out I'd like to see WB bring in a transgender Batman.

I don't understand what you're trying to accomplish with this post

Really? Seems pretty clear to me.

You're still pissed nobody cares about Jagged Little Pill aren't you?

durdencommatyler wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:Now that Affleck is out I'd like to see WB bring in a transgender Batman.

I don't understand what you're trying to accomplish with this post

Really? Seems pretty clear to me.

You're still pissed nobody cares about Jagged Little Pill aren't you?

I've never cared about anything less, friend.