Page 181 of 199
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sat April 08, 2023 4:04 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sat April 08, 2023 4:06 pm
by 96583UP
simple schoolboy wrote:96583UP wrote:something about the way he looks
just makes me think he's guilty
Okay there, Khmer Rogue, by all means let's force him to work in the fields and be re-educated because of his bourgeois glasses.
nope, not the glasses… it’s something else… but I just can’t quite put my finger on it
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sat April 08, 2023 4:06 pm
by 96583UP
tragabigzanda wrote:Wtf Bi
ok call me
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sat April 08, 2023 4:29 pm
by Bi_3
tragabigzanda wrote:Wtf Bi
?
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sat April 08, 2023 5:07 pm
by elliseamos
Firstly, the $14M is just what he's contributed to campaigns above board. It says nothing of what he's given to PACs that he and they don't have to disclose publicly. The link you provided even states "huge sums of dark money."
Second of all, it's not even about the direct influence.
Crow not only has greater ability to connect Thomas (and his wife) with countless other influential people, but Crow can also boast that he can influence Thomas on another person's behalf. Which is even more beneficial for this other person because Crow can claim it's not a "specific ruling before Thomas that relates to Crow's businesses."
I agree that this story will not change anything about Thomas's seat, but it will certainly inspire some conversation about some new rules for justices moving forward.
Lastly, would these people be "friends", one's where it makes complete sense for Crow to pay for Thomas to go on vacation, if Thomas weren't a justice?
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sat April 08, 2023 6:10 pm
by Bi_3
Y’all sound a lot like the anti-Soros crowd right now.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sat April 08, 2023 11:16 pm
by 96583UP
throw him in the slammer
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sun April 09, 2023 1:40 am
by elliseamos
I expected this exact whataboutism to show up sooner.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sun April 09, 2023 12:43 pm
by Bi_3
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sun April 09, 2023 12:43 pm
by Bi_3
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sun April 09, 2023 12:50 pm
by 96583UP
look, everyone is entitled to a little hitler memoriabilia now and then
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sun April 09, 2023 1:05 pm
by JuanHamm
Has phase two begun yet?
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sun April 09, 2023 1:14 pm
by Bi_3
JuanHamm wrote:Has phase two begun yet?
Yes. It’s under “Operation Dark Trump”
Edit:
Here’s a story on it from prior to phase 2:
https://www.dallasnews.com/arts-enterta ... rows-home/
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sun April 09, 2023 9:18 pm
by elliseamos
This isn't about, Harlan Crow.
This is about Clarence Thomas.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sun April 09, 2023 10:05 pm
by B
blueviper wrote:As a public servant he should know the ethical problems this raises.
Even myself as a lowly local government employee go through ethics training and have guidelines on gifts that are or are not acceptable. I don’t let vendors take me out for lunches. Anything provided by a vendor as a gift or thanks to the city has to be $50 or below.
He’s at the highest level of government. And a judge. He should know better.
If only we'd had a hint of his unethical behavior before he was sworn onto the Court!

Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Mon April 10, 2023 3:06 pm
by warehouse
why would anyone compare anything to that weirdo? lol
how much is his wife worth? i can't believe people are pretending these people are friends
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu April 13, 2023 6:42 pm
by Bi_3
So the new info about Thomas' real estate deal is actually problematic. That must be disclosed.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu April 13, 2023 6:48 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu April 13, 2023 7:48 pm
by wease
Bi_3 wrote:So the new info about Thomas' real estate deal is actually problematic. That must be disclosed.
Not heard about this yet.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu April 13, 2023 8:11 pm
by Chris_H_2
the federal bar has a requirement that mandates all members to report what they know to be violations of codes and cannons of ethics by other members of the bar, including judges and justices. i presume the same is true for other members of the court about their colleagues.