Page 181 of 472

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Fri July 22, 2016 10:51 pm
by BurtReynolds
Bi_3 wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
jwfocker wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
Biff Pocoroba wrote:I had watched most of the convention until last night, when I only caught most of Trump. Aren't those speeches supposed to be upbeat & optimistic instead of dark & gloomy? It was like he was running for mayor of Gotham City instead of President.
For the 10's of millions of Americans whose jobs were destroyed by globalization or immigration, shit's not exactly coming up roses. If the Dems would stop calling all these people racists for 5 minutes and listen to their issues, we could probably get rid of Floppsie and his clown brigade.

Unemployment is at 4.9% which is the lowest its been in a decade.

Quoting the U3 as an argument showes you have no idea what you are talking about nor what I was talking about.
The U6 trends nearly identical to U3. The numbers are just bigger because it is creating a more holistic view. So the massive downtrend in unemployment starting in 2010 is as clear using that marker as on the U3.

Image

Sure. But that was about beginning understanding the meaning of the statistic vs. typing "us unemployment rate" into google. The next step is to pull that number apart and begin to understand changes in those trend lines for Trump's supporters demographics.
This is more relevant than unemployment numbers when describing the problems Western middle class faces.
Image

And don't get me started on wage stagnation.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Fri July 22, 2016 11:01 pm
by bune
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Can someone explain the significance of endorsements to me? Does it actually make any tangible difference? I can't imagine the public gives a shit, or even notices.
They notice when it's an endorsement that's counter to their preferred candidate.

See: The Washington Post and the responses that will inevitably be about how it's because he 'fired' them from the campaign.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Fri July 22, 2016 11:06 pm
by BurtReynolds
Why wouldn't it make a difference? If your preferred candidate endorses another candidate, shouldn't that influence you at least somewhat?

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Fri July 22, 2016 11:17 pm
by BurtReynolds
work account:
Hillary: 55
Trump: 53
Bernie: 264
Gary Johnson: 31

personal account:

Hillary: 3 lol
Trump: 10
Bernie: 17
Gary Johnson: 4

So it looks like Bernie will be the next president of the United States!

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Sat July 23, 2016 12:24 am
by Green Habit
Mike Pence and Tim Kaine have to be the most boring VP candidates in a long time.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Sat July 23, 2016 12:26 am
by Self
Image

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Sat July 23, 2016 12:59 am
by LoathedVermin72
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Can someone explain the significance of endorsements to me? Does it actually make any tangible difference? I can't imagine the public gives a shit, or even notices.
You didn't buy that curved TV after Michael Bay endorsed it?
I already wanted one of those, but now I REALLY want one.
I thought you thought those TVs were stupid and pointless. :?
I've had some hands-on experience with them in recent months and I have been converted. I love them now.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Sat July 23, 2016 1:18 am
by Electromatic
bart wrote:
Electromatic wrote:On the Hillary side... I mean, I can't think of a less trustworthy less likeable person in politics. It's kind of interesting that really either one can seemingly go around, do anything, say virtually anything and there is no recourse. No matter what these two people are going to have big fans.
Stuff like this blows my mind. The fact that people can still try to imply that there's some sort of moral or political equivalence between Clinton and Trump really is amazing.
In that they are both generally horrible people? Yes.

I don't think she has a moral fiber in her body.

He's a salesman, he's pretty obviously full of shit when he wants something. Clinton is one of the least genuine people in the entire world. I really wonder if she uses a focus group to decide what toothpaste to use.

Clinton is going to be the president, barring something crazy happening, because she's going to maintain status quo, I'm not sure anyone including Trump knows what he'd really do if he won. Governments aren't run like businesses and this one is specifically built to limit his kind.

I can't Bart understand why anyone would like either of these humans. Everyone's got their reasons for how they vote. I've been a 3rd party guy for a long time, but this is an awful election cycle, either way we're stuck with a smug arrogant ruthless jerk as the president.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Sat July 23, 2016 1:25 am
by 96583UP
my thought on this is:

if you are not in a swing state, vote for whatever frootloop you want

if you are in a swing state, VOTE FOR HILLARY!!!!!!!!!

"In a system of immense power, small differences can translate into large outcomes."

we are choosing between two bad outcomes. CHOOSE THE LESS BAD OUTCOME

:)

there are still local and regional elections where one can try to move the needle toward the left. but as far as this POTUS race: tuck away the idealism for now and be practical. there is a difference between a mass shooting where 28,000 people die and one where 28 people die

choose the 28-person mass shooting

choose Hillary

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Sat July 23, 2016 1:33 am
by McParadigm
Times like this make me realize I don't know much about Clinton, other than that she was the principal author of our Iran sanctions, probably thinks email is magic, was betrayed by her husband, and some idiots think she has magical murder powers.

By comparison, I know a billion little details about Donald Trump, and even the smallest, simplest one (makes false claims about major American historical events in order to build up buzz for a golf course) makes him look putrid to me.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Sat July 23, 2016 1:48 am
by 96583UP
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton

campaign slogan: "Look, it could be worse. A lot worse."

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Sat July 23, 2016 2:25 am
by BurtReynolds
I feel like Hillary would cause a controlled decay that would allow the U.S. sink to a level of depravity so low that it finally allows our true master Satan and his minions to emerge from the Earth and cleanse the land of humanity once and for all.

Trump would cause immediate devastation so shocking in scale that it could wake humanity from their slumber and force them to change their ways, leading to a new age of peace and discovery, at least for those that survive the nuclear radiated hellscape he causes.

So I'm probably gonna chill at home and watch Netflix.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Sat July 23, 2016 2:29 am
by McParadigm
BurtReynolds wrote:I feel like Hillary would cause a controlled decay that would allow the U.S. sink to a level of depravity so low that it finally allows our true master Satan and his minions to emerge from the Earth and cleanse the land of humanity once and for all.

Trump would cause immediate devastation so shocking in scale that it could wake humanity from their slumber and force them to change their ways, leading to a new age of peace and discovery, at least for those that survive the nuclear radiated hellscape he causes.

So I'm probably gonna chill at home and watch Netflix.
Trump 2016, Zephram Cochrane 2020

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Sat July 23, 2016 2:33 am
by BurtReynolds
McParadigm wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:I feel like Hillary would cause a controlled decay that would allow the U.S. sink to a level of depravity so low that it finally allows our true master Satan and his minions to emerge from the Earth and cleanse the land of humanity once and for all.

Trump would cause immediate devastation so shocking in scale that it could wake humanity from their slumber and force them to change their ways, leading to a new age of peace and discovery, at least for those that survive the nuclear radiated hellscape he causes.

So I'm probably gonna chill at home and watch Netflix.
Trump 2016, Zephram Cochrane 2020
It's the only way to escape the time loop.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Sat July 23, 2016 2:40 am
by Simple Torture
BurtReynolds wrote: Trump would cause immediate devastation so shocking in scale that it could wake humanity from their slumber and force them to change their ways, leading to a new age of peace and discovery, at least for those that survive the nuclear radiated hellscape he causes.
I'm pretty good at Fallout, so I can help people out if need be.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Sat July 23, 2016 2:45 am
by BurtReynolds
Simple Torture wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote: Trump would cause immediate devastation so shocking in scale that it could wake humanity from their slumber and force them to change their ways, leading to a new age of peace and discovery, at least for those that survive the nuclear radiated hellscape he causes.
I'm pretty good at Fallout, so I can help people out if need be.
I could always use some more Rad-X.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Sat July 23, 2016 3:22 am
by Bi_3
96583UP wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton

campaign slogan: "Look, it could be worse. A lot worse."
Basically my wife's wedding vows.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Sat July 23, 2016 5:52 am
by Norah
Green Habit wrote:Mike Pence and Tim Kaine have to be the most boring VP candidates in a long time.
In my heart of hearts, Joe Biden is irreplaceable. No one can live up to him.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Sat July 23, 2016 6:57 am
by BurtReynolds
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Green Habit wrote:Mike Pence and Tim Kaine have to be the most boring VP candidates in a long time.
In my heart of hearts, Joe Biden is irreplaceable. No one can live up to him.
Diamond Joe will be missed.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Sat July 23, 2016 5:18 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE