Red Mosquito

BurtReynolds wrote:

Peeps wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:Why would an anti-abortion person think there should be a rape/poverty exception to abortion if they think abortion is murdering babies? I don't think the platform of "killing people because there are too many poor people" is going to fly very far if you are actually trying to convince anyone of your position, regardless of the economic benefits killing people would provide.

why do anti-abortion people think you shouldnt kill babies but think its ok to bomb a planned parent hood facility killing people

For the same reason you would kill people trying to kill people I assume.

BurtReynolds wrote:

Peeps wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:Why would an anti-abortion person think there should be a rape/poverty exception to abortion if they think abortion is murdering babies? I don't think the platform of "killing people because there are too many poor people" is going to fly very far if you are actually trying to convince anyone of your position, regardless of the economic benefits killing people would provide.

why do anti-abortion people think you shouldnt kill babies but think its ok to bomb a planned parent hood facility killing people

For the same reason you would kill people trying to kill people I assume.

Gerard Cheshire[edit]

In 2019 Romance Studies published Cheshire's paper "The Language and Writing System of MS408 (Voynich)".[99] Cheshire, a biology research assistant at the University of Bristol, claims to have deciphered the manuscript in two weeks using a combination of "lateral thinking and ingenuity."[100][101] Cheshire claims that the manuscript is "a compendium of information on herbal remedies, therapeutic bathing and astrological readings” with a focus on female physical and mental health, reproduction and parenting and that the manuscript is the only known text written in proto-Romance.[102] He said: "The manuscript was compiled by Dominican nuns as a source of reference for Maria of Castile, Queen of Aragon."[103] However, experts in medieval documents have disputed this interpretation[104] with the executive editor of Medieval Academy of America Lisa Fagin Davis denouncing the paper as "just more aspirational, circular, self-fulfilling nonsense".[102] Approached for comment by Ars Technica[105], Davis gave this explanation:

As with most would-be Voynich interpreters, the logic of this proposal is circular and aspirational: he starts with a theory about what a particular series of glyphs might mean, usually because of the word's proximity to an image that he believes he can interpret. He then investigates any number of medieval Romance-language dictionaries until he finds a word that seems to suit his theory. Then he argues that because he has found a Romance-language word that fits his hypothesis, his hypothesis must be right. His "translations" from what is essentially gibberish, an amalgam of multiple languages, are themselves aspirational rather than being actual translations.

— Fagin Davis

A Danish parliamentary candidate is pioneering a radical new campaign strategy: advertising on PornHub. “You need to get out everywhere, so we thought it could be amusing with an ad on Pornhub,” Joachim B. Olsen, of the Liberal Alliance, said, according to Politico. “Half the internet is porn and you need to be where the voters are—including a porn site.” His campaign slogan is similarly tawdry: “Når du er færdig med at gokke, så stem på Jokke”—aka, “when you finish wanking, vote for Jokke.” “I know that some people will be aghast,” he said. “You can’t say anything today without some people getting upset. I don’t take it very seriously. Those who know me as a politician know that I am serious, but I have a sense of humor and think this is a good laugh.” Olsen, who previously won a silver medal in shot put at the 2004 Olympics, said he didn’t discuss his plans with his party before running the ad—but he’s hoping it will help him win big in the nation’s June 5th general election.

Peeps wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

Peeps wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:Why would an anti-abortion person think there should be a rape/poverty exception to abortion if they think abortion is murdering babies? I don't think the platform of "killing people because there are too many poor people" is going to fly very far if you are actually trying to convince anyone of your position, regardless of the economic benefits killing people would provide.

why do anti-abortion people think you shouldnt kill babies but think its ok to bomb a planned parent hood facility killing people

For the same reason you would kill people trying to kill people I assume.

i know logic rarely comes into play but if youre against killing babies then you should naturally be against killing people in general

Electromatic wrote:It's interesting to me that Abortion is such a hot button issue now for conservatives.

BurtReynolds wrote:

Peeps wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

Peeps wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:Why would an anti-abortion person think there should be a rape/poverty exception to abortion if they think abortion is murdering babies? I don't think the platform of "killing people because there are too many poor people" is going to fly very far if you are actually trying to convince anyone of your position, regardless of the economic benefits killing people would provide.

why do anti-abortion people think you shouldnt kill babies but think its ok to bomb a planned parent hood facility killing people

For the same reason you would kill people trying to kill people I assume.

i know logic rarely comes into play but if youre against killing babies then you should naturally be against killing people in general

I assume you are not in favor of killing babies. Are you also not in favor of killing people who are trying to kill people?

dimejinky99 wrote:When exactly did Christian fundamentalism take control in these states?