Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri April 14, 2023 1:01 am
this is true!wease wrote:If only we'd had a hint of his unethical behavior before he was sworn onto the Court!
but what does ethics have to do with justice?
Page 183 of 199
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri April 14, 2023 1:02 am
but what does ethics have to do with justice?
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri April 14, 2023 1:03 am
please answer in 10 words or less should be a quickie
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri April 14, 2023 1:19 am
Innocent until proven guilty
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri April 14, 2023 1:27 am
Everything.96583UP wrote:this is true!wease wrote:If only we'd had a hint of his unethical behavior before he was sworn onto the Court!
but what does ethics have to do with justice?
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri April 14, 2023 1:29 am
both are incorrect!
A: There is no such thing as justice
Only Power
A: There is no such thing as justice
Only Power
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri April 14, 2023 1:30 am
fr though
this looks like an objective rule violation
Roberts should give him the boot
this looks like an objective rule violation
Roberts should give him the boot
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sun April 16, 2023 6:08 pm
Getting a bit desperate.
Headlines:
"Clarence Thomas has for years claimed income from a defunct real estate firm"
"Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas reportedly has been claiming thousands of dollars annually from a shuttered real estate firm"
They really need to start phase three now; go after his wife and kid.
Headlines:
"Clarence Thomas has for years claimed income from a defunct real estate firm"
"Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas reportedly has been claiming thousands of dollars annually from a shuttered real estate firm"
Thomas has reported income from a firm called Ginger, Ltd., Partnership over the last two decades, but in 2006 it was shut down and replaced by a new firm, the report said. The new firm, Ginger Holdings, LLC, is similarly named, but there is no mention of it in Thomas’ records.
They really need to start phase three now; go after his wife and kid.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sun April 16, 2023 11:20 pm
Roberts has the authority to remove judges? Isn't the only remedy impeachment in the Senate?96583UP wrote:fr though
this looks like an objective rule violation
Roberts should give him the boot
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sun April 16, 2023 11:23 pm
I think 9up was suggesting that Roberts should kick him to deathsimple schoolboy wrote:Roberts has the authority to remove judges? Isn't the only remedy impeachment in the Senate?96583UP wrote:fr though
this looks like an objective rule violation
Roberts should give him the boot
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sun April 16, 2023 11:24 pm
JuanHamm wrote:I think 9up was suggesting that Roberts should kick him to deathsimple schoolboy wrote:Roberts has the authority to remove judges? Isn't the only remedy impeachment in the Senate?96583UP wrote:fr though
this looks like an objective rule violation
Roberts should give him the boot
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Mon April 17, 2023 12:31 am
you both are wrong, and being totally inappropriatesimple schoolboy wrote:JuanHamm wrote:I think 9up was suggesting that Roberts should kick him to deathsimple schoolboy wrote:Roberts has the authority to remove judges? Isn't the only remedy impeachment in the Senate?96583UP wrote:fr though
this looks like an objective rule violation
Roberts should give him the boot
i meant he should give him a glass boot full of beer and make him chug it
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Mon April 17, 2023 12:38 am
you're confusing clarence with kavanaugh96583UP wrote:you both are wrong, and being totally inappropriate
i meant he should give him a glass boot full of beer and make him chug it
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Mon April 17, 2023 12:40 am
kavanaugh and clarence planning devil's triangle on AlitoPeeps wrote:you're confusing clarence with kavanaugh96583UP wrote:you both are wrong, and being totally inappropriate
i meant he should give him a glass boot full of beer and make him chug it
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Mon April 17, 2023 6:08 am
This isn't a court of justice, son96583UP wrote:both are incorrect!
A: There is no such thing as justice
Only Power
This is a court of law
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue April 18, 2023 12:08 pm
Today's case is right up GH's alley, he's probably dreading how it might turn out.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed April 26, 2023 1:02 am
Felt left out Gorsuch?
It emerged Tuesday that after nearly two years of trying to sell a vacation property, Gorsuch and two partners found a buyer — who happened to be the head of a major law firm that often practices before the high court. That's according to a financial disclosure report, which shows the sale to Greenberg Traurig CEO Brian Duffy came a month after Gorsuch was appointed to the Supreme Court in April 2017.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed April 26, 2023 1:54 am
these guys all have terrible real estate salesmen
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed April 26, 2023 2:21 am
Until they become justices that is...96583UP wrote:these guys all have terrible real estate salesmen
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed April 26, 2023 2:25 am
Hey bammer I’ve got an idea for you