Page 184 of 199
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed April 26, 2023 2:55 am
by simple schoolboy
elliseamos wrote:Felt left out Gorsuch?
It emerged Tuesday that after nearly two years of trying to sell a vacation property, Gorsuch and two partners found a buyer — who happened to be the head of a major law firm that often practices before the high court. That's according to a financial disclosure report, which shows the sale to Greenberg Traurig CEO Brian Duffy came a month after Gorsuch was appointed to the Supreme Court in April 2017.
If this is the best oppo research they have, Gorsuch is fine. I don't understand this grasping at the Justices. Ground work for impeachment/ nullification?
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed April 26, 2023 1:53 pm
by Bi_3
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed April 26, 2023 4:23 pm
by 4/5
Yeah there are lots of examples of this. Absolutely brutal, overt theft by state governments. I read about this months ago when the Court took the case so I'm light on details at the moment but I think there's a handful of states who do this and one or two in particular who have done this repeatedly.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed April 26, 2023 5:36 pm
by simple schoolboy
4/5 wrote:Yeah there are lots of examples of this. Absolutely brutal, overt theft by state governments. I read about this months ago when the Court took the case so I'm light on details at the moment but I think there's a handful of states who do this and one or two in particular who have done this repeatedly.
They have so far refused to blow up civil asset forfeiture. Turns out when you are on the government payroll, you are incentivised to not pay too much attention to where that money comes from.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri April 28, 2023 3:29 am
by McParadigm
Wow, court legitimacy used to be a big thing around here huh
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri April 28, 2023 12:53 pm
by B
Bi_3 wrote:
Thomas and Alito are going to be SOOOOOOOO mad if they don't get 3 other Justices to give States the power to destroy Black people over $2,300.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/25/us/s ... taxes.html
Unanimous in favor of Geraldine!
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri April 28, 2023 2:02 pm
by Bi_3
Skipping to phase 4: Hardcore pivot from Thomas to Kavanaugh incoming!
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri April 28, 2023 8:30 pm
by 96583UP
these fucking people
Jane Roberts, who is married to Chief Justice John Roberts, made $10.3 million in commissions from elite law firms, whistleblower documents show
https://www.businessinsider.com/jane-ro ... ons-2023-4
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri April 28, 2023 8:42 pm
by Bi_3
So according to the article she did nothing illegal, followed explicit legal guidance, and the ‘whistleblower’ lost a poaching suit against her ten years ago?
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri April 28, 2023 8:53 pm
by JuanHamm
Bi_3 wrote:
So according to the article she did nothing illegal, followed explicit legal guidance, and the ‘whistleblower’ lost a poaching suit against her ten years ago?
What a bitch
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri April 28, 2023 9:03 pm
by 96583UP
JuanHamm wrote:Bi_3 wrote:
So according to the article she did nothing illegal, followed explicit legal guidance, and the ‘whistleblower’ lost a poaching suit against her ten years ago?
What a bitch
Exactly
Women are not supposed to be in the workforce
This is haram
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri April 28, 2023 9:15 pm
by B
Bi_3 wrote:
So according to the article she did nothing illegal, followed explicit legal guidance, and the ‘whistleblower’ lost a poaching suit against her ten years ago?
None of that is testimony to hers or her husband's ethics.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri April 28, 2023 9:25 pm
by Bi_3
B wrote:Bi_3 wrote:
So according to the article she did nothing illegal, followed explicit legal guidance, and the ‘whistleblower’ lost a poaching suit against her ten years ago?
None of that is testimony to hers or her husband's ethics.
Are you OK? Do you need a COVID booster?
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri April 28, 2023 9:58 pm
by B
What did I miss?
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri April 28, 2023 9:59 pm
by 96583UP
this has to be Phase 3 finally, right?
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri April 28, 2023 10:06 pm
by JuanHamm
This is phase 2-b
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri April 28, 2023 10:34 pm
by 96583UP
i mean
why can’t it just be called phase 3
it’s not like there has to be a top limit to phases
or does there
fak
we need direction
Q instruct us
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sat April 29, 2023 2:28 am
by B
Phase 5 is appoint 6 new Justices.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sat April 29, 2023 10:19 am
by Bi_3
Phase 5 is declare the court illegitimate so that progressives no longer feel bound by its rulings. You’ll see more and more language on that during the next 6 months.
Anyway… Not that y’all care about reality but Alito dropped some interesting nugs recently:
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Sat April 29, 2023 11:01 am
by B
How would the leak make anyone a target in a way that the decision, a couple of weeks later, would not?