Red Mosquito

B wrote:How would the leak make anyone a target in a way that the decision, a couple of weeks later, would not?

In theory the justices could have changed their position before the final ruling was issued

Bi_3 wrote:

B wrote:How would the leak make anyone a target in a way that the decision, a couple of weeks later, would not?

In theory the justices could have changed their position before the final ruling was issued

Clearly Roberts the squish would be the most viable target.

Bi_3 wrote:

B wrote:How would the leak make anyone a target in a way that the decision, a couple of weeks later, would not?

In theory the justices could have changed their position before the final ruling was issued

So, Alito had to "be a target" for an extra 3 weeks than he would have otherwise? Will the suffering of America's most powerful citizens ever end?

B wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

B wrote:How would the leak make anyone a target in a way that the decision, a couple of weeks later, would not?

In theory the justices could have changed their position before the final ruling was issued

So, Alito had to "be a target" for an extra 3 weeks than he would have otherwise? Will the suffering of America's most powerful citizens ever end?

You haven't always been this deranged, have you?

simple schoolboy wrote:

B wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

B wrote:How would the leak make anyone a target in a way that the decision, a couple of weeks later, would not?

In theory the justices could have changed their position before the final ruling was issued

So, Alito had to "be a target" for an extra 3 weeks than he would have otherwise? Will the suffering of America's most powerful citizens ever end?

You haven't always been this deranged, have you?

I can’t speak to the PhatJ’s and R2D’s of the world who have abandoned RM, but for those still here, B has easily fallen off the cliff more than anyone over the past few years.

What happened to you.

Get a grip, man.

I don't believe the Justices were really in any significant excess danger. I mean, know Kavanaugh had a weird guy standing around outside of his house, but no one broke in and beat his wife in the head with a hammer.

That being said, am I deranged for not understanding how the Dobbs leak put the Justices in danger in a way that the actually opinion, which was unchanged from the leak, did?

Alito is just sad that people don't like him.

Make no mistake, rm's star wars contingent has always been as deranged as the macphistos/phatjs/r2ds.

B wrote:I don't believe the Justices were really in any significant excess danger. I mean, know Kavanaugh had a weird guy standing around outside of his house, but no one broke in and beat his wife in the head with a hammer.

That being said, am I deranged for not understanding how the Dobbs leak put the Justices in danger in a way that the actually opinion, which was unchanged from the leak, did?

Alito is just sad that people don't like him.

Frankly, yes. Threatening judges and their families before is a tool to induce them to change their vote before the final decision is rendered. Threatening the Justices after the decision does nothing, because it's been set and is now law. These are clearly different levels of danger for those involved. You come off as digging for some rationale to downplay the situation because you are good with threatening them and their families in this way. I'm not saying you are, just that it reads that way.

This is a big one, and one that's had potential to be coming down the pipeline.

Bi_3 wrote:

B wrote:I don't believe the Justices were really in any significant excess danger. I mean, know Kavanaugh had a weird guy standing around outside of his house, but no one broke in and beat his wife in the head with a hammer.

That being said, am I deranged for not understanding how the Dobbs leak put the Justices in danger in a way that the actually opinion, which was unchanged from the leak, did?

Alito is just sad that people don't like him.

Frankly, yes. Threatening judges and their families before is a tool to induce them to change their vote before the final decision is rendered. Threatening the Justices after the decision does nothing, because it's been set and is now law. These are clearly different levels of danger for those involved. You come off as digging for some rationale to downplay the situation because you are good with threatening them and their families in this way. I'm not saying you are, just that it reads that way.

Every human being on Earth knew the minute they heard the Dobbs case that they were going to overrule Roe. I don't think it's credible to say they were a target just because it happened to leak. I get that you think I'm wrong, whatever.

But you can shove "deranged" up your asses, especially given that exactly one person was arrested in those 5 weeks.

Alito is a whiny piece of shit who is mad that people don't like his shitty agenda.

Alito is a whiny piece of shit who is mad that people don't like his shitty agenda.

Alito is a whiny piece of shit who is mad that people don't like his shitty agenda and thin dick

B wrote:Alito is a whiny piece of shit who is mad that people don't like his shitty agenda.

I'm guessing this is probably closer to being accurate than many people want to acknowledge.

Bi_3 wrote:Phase 5 is declare the court illegitimate so that progressives no longer feel bound by its rulings. You’ll see more and more language on that during the next 6 months.

Right on cue.

Wait, did we skip phase 4?

Bi_3 wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:Phase 5 is declare the court illegitimate so that progressives no longer feel bound by its rulings. You’ll see more and more language on that during the next 6 months.

Right on cue.

im not a law expert by any means but it seems to me if you are a judge and your wife is paid by clients who are before your court then yes, its illegitmate/compromised or whatever you want to say it is. its not right and the fact that no one in power on the court sees this as a problem hints that most if not all of them have compromised values to some degree and are engaging in this sort of behavior

Peeps wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:Phase 5 is declare the court illegitimate so that progressives no longer feel bound by its rulings. You’ll see more and more language on that during the next 6 months.

Right on cue.

im not a law expert by any means but it seems to me if you are a judge and your wife is paid by clients who are before your court then yes, its illegitmate/compromised or whatever you want to say it is. its not right and the fact that no one in power on the court sees this as a problem hints that most if not all of them have compromised values to some degree and are engaging in this sort of behavior

Excellent and entirely independently derived conclusion

soooooo we did do phase 3 after all

and 4 apparently

wtf

96583UP wrote:soooooo we did do phase 3 after all

and 4 apparently

wtf

We need more transparency regarding phases. This is getting out of control.