The Supreme Court

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by elliseamos »

Phase 3-6 are illegitimate.

I'm on phase 7, which is the only true phase 3.
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

JuanHamm wrote:
96583UP wrote:soooooo we did do phase 3 after all

and 4 apparently

wtf
We need more transparency regarding phases. This is getting out of control.

Four was paltering to prep for five. After a hearing enough allegations against the judges, folks will assume there is truth to them even if each individual allegation is spotty and/or meaningless, because where there is smoke there is fire right? Birtherism is good example of that.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

god dammit

alright let me get a pen so i can write all this down...
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

Execute phase 6 point 6

Clarence Thomas Had a Child in Private School. Harlan Crow Paid the Tuition.
In 2008, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas decided to send his teenage grandnephew to Hidden Lake Academy, a private boarding school in the foothills of northern Georgia. The boy, Mark Martin, was far from home. For the previous decade, he had lived with the justice and his wife in the suburbs of Washington, D.C. Thomas had taken legal custody of Martin when he was 6 years old and had recently told an interviewer he was “raising him as a son.”

Tuition at the boarding school ran more than $6,000 a month. But Thomas did not cover the bill. A bank statement for the school from July 2009, buried in unrelated court filings, shows the source of Martin’s tuition payment for that month: the company of billionaire real estate magnate Harlan Crow.

The payments extended beyond that month, according to Christopher Grimwood, a former administrator at the school. Crow paid Martin’s tuition the entire time he was a student there.

Before and after his time at Hidden Lake, Martin attended a second boarding school, Randolph-Macon Academy in Virginia. “Harlan said he was paying for the tuition at Randolph-Macon Academy as well,” Grimwood said, recalling a conversation he had with Crow during a visit to the billionaire’s Adirondacks estate.

Thomas did not report the tuition payments from Crow on his annual financial disclosures. Several years earlier, Thomas disclosed a gift of $5,000 for Martin’s education from another friend. It is not clear why he reported that payment but not Crow’s.

“Harlan Crow has long been passionate about the importance of quality education and giving back to those less fortunate, especially at-risk youth,” the statement said. “It’s disappointing that those with partisan political interests would try to turn helping at-risk youth with tuition assistance into something nefarious or political.” The statement added that Crow and his wife have “supported many young Americans” at a “variety of schools, including his alma mater.” Crow went to Randolph-Macon Academy.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35452
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by spike »

just what friends do
User avatar
Peeps
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7307
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Peeps »

they are saying since it was his nephew that he didnt need to report it due to the way the law is written
Did the Mother Fucker pay extra to yell?
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

Peeps wrote:they are saying since it was his nephew that he didnt need to report it due to the way the law is written
If he legally adopted the kid, that doesn't matter.

But I think we have sufficiently proven that Justice Thomas is not good at financial disclosure paperwork.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45833
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by BurtReynolds »

I think this guy might be dirty.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

BurtReynolds wrote:I think this guy might be dirty.

He is a Distinguished Gentleman.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40176
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by wease »

If only we'd had a hint of his unethical behavior before he was sworn onto the Court!
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

wease wrote:If only we'd had a hint of his unethical behavior before he was sworn onto the Court!
:thumbsup:
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

definitely considered a bribe in-kind in any other industry
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

96583UP wrote:definitely considered a bribe in-kind in any other industry
Would it make a difference if he had disclosed it?
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

Bi_3 wrote:
96583UP wrote:definitely considered a bribe in-kind in any other industry
Would it make a difference if he had disclosed it?
Sure. He's currently a corrupt liar. If he'd disclosed it, he'd just be plain corrupt.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

B wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
96583UP wrote:definitely considered a bribe in-kind in any other industry
Would it make a difference if he had disclosed it?
Sure. He's currently a corrupt liar. If he'd disclosed it, he'd just be plain corrupt.

What actions pushed him over the line into being corrupt?
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
Peeps
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7307
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Peeps »

Bi_3 wrote:
96583UP wrote:definitely considered a bribe in-kind in any other industry
Would it make a difference if he had disclosed it?
if he would have disclosed it then people could have asked why he didnt recuse himself because it is clearly a case of conflict of interest

by not disclosing it and then still being on the bench to hear cases makes him seem bought and paid for
Did the Mother Fucker pay extra to yell?
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

Bi_3 wrote:
B wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
96583UP wrote:definitely considered a bribe in-kind in any other industry
Would it make a difference if he had disclosed it?
Sure. He's currently a corrupt liar. If he'd disclosed it, he'd just be plain corrupt.

What actions pushed him over the line into being corrupt?
He takes money, a fuckload of money, from a real estate magnate and Republican advocate while ruling in a perfect line down every item that is or could be on that man's agenda. Sure, that could just be a unrelated. Gravity and shit falling to the ground could also be unrelated.

Also, and I don't think this is corruption, but he's best friends with a Nazi. I'm like my Justices to be non-Nazi-adjacent.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by McParadigm »

(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bi_3 »

We are way past Phase 3 (friends and family), McP.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

if he were an executive at a publicly traded bank he would be fired today

disclosure wouldn't absolve the conflict of interest

it would be the first step to resignation/termination

why should a supreme court justice be held to a lower standard than a bank CEO

they shouldn't

it should be higher

he should be watched even more closely, and with firmer penalties

like treason to the constitution and the flag

eat the flag, clarence

eat the flag
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Post Reply